BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 116682
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.116682
Table 1 Expression of lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 2 in transarterial chemoembolization-resistant and non-resistant groups (n = 60), n (%)
Group
Low LHFPL2
High LHFPL2
χ2
P value
TACE-resistant8 (26.67)22 (73.33)17.140< 0.001
Non-resistant24 (80.00)6 (20.00)--
Table 2 Comparison of clinical and pathological features between transarterial chemoembolization-resistant and non-resistant groups, n (%)
Variable
TACE-resistant (n = 30)
Non-resistant (n = 30)
χ2/t/Z
P value
Sex1.2000.273
Male18 (60.00)22 (73.33)
Female12 (40.00)8 (26.67)
Age (years), mean ± SD64.40 ± 10.5364.27 ± 10.610.0480.962
HBV carrier6.7870.010
Yes22 (73.33)12 (40.00)
No8 (26.67)18 (60.00)
Cirrhosis3.3600.067
Yes16 (53.33)9 (30.00)
No14 (46.67)21 (70.00)
AFP level-< 0.001
≥ 400 ng/mL18 (60.00)4 (13.33)
< 400 ng/mL12 (40.00)26 (86.67)
Tumor size2.4430.118
> 3 cm20 (66.67)14 (46.67)
≤ 3 cm10 (33.33)16 (53.33)
Histologic differentiation8.1310.017
Poor15 (50.00)5 (16.67)
Moderate7 (23.33)15 (50.00)
Well8 (26.67)10 (33.33)
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses of prognostic survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
IndexUnivariate analysis
Multiple factor
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age1.0401.000-1.0840.067---
Sex0.6880.318-2.9200.342---
HBV carrier1.9310.877-4.2530.102---
Cirrhosis1.9770.925-4.2260.079---
AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL13.4834.634-39.226< 0.00138.6325.274-282.970< 0.001
Tumor size > 3 cm1.6950.758-3.7870.198---
Poor differentiation0.5840.341-1.0010.050---
High LHFPL24.4901.950-10.341< 0.0015.4081.569-18.6420.008
TACE refractoriness12.4444.131-37.489< 0.0016.9551.458-33.1700.015


Write to the Help Desk