BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 119999
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.119999
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
Project
Category
Control group (n = 40)
Observation group (n = 40)
Test statistic
P value
Age (year)50.50 ± 16.7050.68 ± 14.59-0.0500.960
GenderMale24 (60.00)18 (45.00)1.8050.179
Female16 (40.00)22 (55.00)
Disease duration (year)1 (1, 1.75)1 (1, 8)-1.1820.237
Table 2 Comparison of surgical-related indicators between the two groups [median (P25, P75)]
Group
Number of cases
Operation time (minute)
Control group4035.00 (25.00,43.75)
Observation group4030.00 (25.00,45.00)
Z value-0.286
P value0.775
Table 3 Comparison of Visual Analogue Scale scores before and after surgery in the two groups (n = 40)
Group
Preoperative
1 day after surgery
5 days post-surgery
Control group0.33 ± 0.663.40 ± 1.062.48 ± 0.72
Observation group0.50 ± 0.932.83 ± 0.961.90 ± 0.50
t value-0.9702.5494.176
P value0.3350.013< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of the two groups’ postoperative recuperation (n = 40)
Group
Hemorrhoid shedding time (day)
Total length of stay (day)
Control group10.90 ± 3.8815.03 ± 5.23
Observation group10.80 ± 3.0712.55 ± 4.29
t value0.1282.315
P value0.8990.023
Table 5 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups [n (%)]
Group
Edema
Bleeding
Anal pressure
Pharmacological laxative intervention
Overall incidence
Control group0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)20 (50.00)20 (50.00)
Observation group0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)12 (30.00)12 (30.00)
χ2 value3.333
P value0.068


Write to the Help Desk