BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 119105
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.119105
Table 1 Phase-integrated, three-pillar, 9 matrix framework spanning the pre-, intra-, and post-transplant periods
Phase of care
Pillar 1: Red cell mass optimization
Pillar 2: Blood loss minimization
Pillar 3: Anemia tolerance optimization
Pre-transplantScreen all candidates for anemia early in transplant evaluation. Identify and correct iron, vitamin B12, and folate deficiencies. Treat inflammation- or renal-related anemia where feasible. Avoiding unnecessary pre-transplant transfusions that may increase sensitization and complicationsPerform structured bleeding risk assessment (portal hypertension, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia). Optimize coagulation status without prophylactic plasma or platelet transfusion. Plan surgical and anesthetic strategies anticipating high-risk bleedingAssess cardiopulmonary reserve and end-organ function. Optimize oxygen delivery (nutrition, respiratory function, cardiac status). Educate the team on restrictive transfusion thresholds
Intra-operativeAvoiding prophylactic or trigger-based transfusion without physiologic indication. Using goal-directed transfusion guided by viscoelastic testing. Preserve autologous red cell mass wherever feasibleEmploy meticulous surgical technique and low-CVP anesthesia. Use antifibrinolytics when indicated. Apply viscoelastic coagulation monitoring (TEG/ROTEM) to guide hemostatic therapy. Consider cell salvage where appropriateAccept lower hemoglobin levels with stable hemodynamics and adequate oxygenation. Maintain normothermia, acid-base balance, and adequate perfusion. Base transfusion decisions on physiologic parameters rather than laboratory values alone
Post-transplantSupport erythropoiesis through nutritional supplementation. Treat ongoing anemia causes (renal dysfunction, inflammation, infection). Minimize phlebotomy-related blood lossMonitor closely for surgical site bleeding and coagulopathy. Avoid routine correction of abnormal coagulation tests without clinical bleeding. Use targeted hemostatic therapy if bleeding occursFollow restrictive transfusion strategies in the ICU and ward. Optimize oxygenation, ventilation, and hemodynamic support. Avoid transfusion-related complications that may impair graft function
Table 2 Reticulocyte production index integrated approach for anemia
RPI < 2
RPI > 2
HypoproliferativeAdequate production
Workup:Look for bleeding/hemolysis
Iron studies, B12/folate Transfusion strategies
Treat deficiencyBleeding management
Recheck RPITransplant readiness, optimize Hb
Table 3 Pre-operative phase screening and optimization
Pre LT screening
Optimization
Uniform-anemia threshold (Hb < 13 g/dL)[29-31]Recent literature supports revising the definition of preoperative anemia for patients undergoing high–blood-loss surgery. Although traditional criteria use sex-specific hemoglobin thresholds, evidence shows that a preoperative hemoglobin level below 13 g/dL is associated with higher transfusion rates, morbidity, and mortality irrespective of sex. Therefore, a hemoglobin cutoff of 13 g/dL is recommended to define preoperative anemia in both men and women in this surgical setting
Serial Hb monitoring to be advised only when indicated[32,33]Standardized order sets that mandate routine blood draws, despite limited evidence supporting their clinical utility may lead to unnecessary investigations, increased healthcare costs, and iatrogenic blood loss, without demonstrable improvement in patient outcomes or reductions in length of hospital stay therefore, needs to be avoided
Detailed bleeding and transfusion history[34-36]National blood collection and utilization survey report 2007, indicates that approximately 40%-70% of all red blood cell transfusions occur in surgical patients. Consequently, a thorough understanding of the etiology and clinical impact of anemia, along with available therapeutic strategies, is essential during preoperative assessment and optimization
Iron studies (ferritin, TSAT, serum iron, TIBC)[37-40]Serum ferritin- Reflects body iron stores. Low in true iron deficiency. Dysregulated iron status (deficiency or overload) correlates with increased post-transplant mortality. TSAT: Percentage of transferrin bound with iron. (< 16%-20%) strong indicator of iron deficiency. Serum iron: Circulating iron bound to transferrin. Decreased in IDA. Varies with inflammation; needs context with TSAT/TIBC. TIBC: Total iron-binding capacity of transferrin. Increases in absolute deficiency
Ferritin with CRP[41]Serum ferritin to C-reactive protein (SF/CRP) ratio ≤ 6 serves as a straightforward and reliable marker of iron deficiency, even in patients with significant systemic inflammation or comorbid conditions
Reticulocyte index[42]RPI based algorithm can be followed to treat the anemia
Vitamin B12 and folate levels[43]Folate and vitamin B12 deficiencies were independently and strongly associated with preoperative anemia, together contributing to nearly one-third of the overall anemia burden. The frequent coexistence of multiple deficiencies, along with considerable variability across surgical populations, highlights the importance of adopting comprehensive but population-tailored diagnostic and supplementation approaches
Renal function tests[44]Renal dysfunction both pre-existing and post-transplant directly impairs erythropoietin production, iron utilization, and red cell survival, thereby contributing to preoperative and postoperative anemia in OLT patients. The high incidence of post-OLT renal failure, particularly severe renal impairment requiring RRT, limits physiological tolerance to anemia and increases transfusion requirements. PBM strategies that identify renal dysfunction early enable optimization of anemia management (e.g., correction of iron deficiency, avoidance of unnecessary phlebotomy, and judicious transfusion), thereby reducing reliance on allogeneic blood products in a population already vulnerable to anemia
Hepcidin measurement[45,46]Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron homeostasis synthesized in the liver, is dysregulated in cirrhosis, with elevated levels reflecting inflammation-mediated iron restriction and suppressed levels indicating true iron deficiency due to reduced hepatic synthetic capacity. Evidence demonstrating that low baseline hepcidin reliably identifies iron deficiency and correlates with iron absorption capacity despite inflammatory confounding, is therefore highly applicable to OLT candidates. Measurement of baseline hepcidin may allow differentiation between true iron deficiency and functional iron sequestration, enabling identification of patients likely to benefit from targeted oral or intravenous iron therapy while avoiding ineffective or potentially harmful empirical supplementation
Hypersplenism assessment (imaging + cytopenias)[47,48]Identifying hypersplenism pretransplant is clinically important. Hypersplenism-related thrombocytopenia contributes to perceived bleeding risk and often prompts prophylactic transfusion, despite limited correlation between platelet count alone and bleeding in cirrhosis. Early recognition allows for individualized planning, including avoidance of unnecessary platelet transfusions, consideration of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in selected patients, and reliance on viscoelastic testing to guide intraoperative hemostatic therapy
Sarcopenia assessment (CT-based)[49,50]Sarcopenia reflects chronic malnutrition, systemic inflammation, hormonal dysregulation, and reduced physical reserve factors that directly impair tolerance to anemia and surgical stress. Patients with sarcopenia have reduced cardiopulmonary and metabolic reserve, making them less able to compensate for perioperative blood loss or anemia and more likely to require transfusion click or tap here to enter text
Frailty assessment (Liver Frailty Index)[51]Sarcopenia serves as a marker of frailty and diminished physiologic reserve, both of which are associated with higher postoperative morbidity, prolonged ICU stay, and mortality outcomes that are also independently linked to increased transfusion exposure
Predictive transfusion risk models, other predictors include CTP-A/hemoglobin concentration, INR, and total time of graft ischemia are preoperative variables associated with blood requirements during OLT and in the subsequent days[52-55]Higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh class, lower hemoglobin concentration, elevated INR, and prolonged total graft ischemia time are linked to increased transfusion needs during surgery and in the early postoperative period. In addition, higher MELD scores, extended cold and warm ischemia times, prior abdominal surgery, and longer operative duration have been identified as independent predictors of intraoperative massive transfusion, commonly defined as the requirement for ten or more units of packed red blood cells. Lower platelet counts and increasing MELD scores particularly driven by elevated INR and bilirubin have also been correlated with greater blood component utilization during OLT, although the overall predictive accuracy of these models remains limited
Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)[56]Stratification of patients based on HVPG identifies distinct bleeding risk profiles, with lower risk observed in patients with HVPG values below 16 mmHg, substantially higher risk at values ≥ 16 mmHg, and a very high bleeding risk when HVPG reaches or exceeds 20 mmHg. Incorporating HVPG into the pretransplant anaesthetic assessment enables proactive, PBM-aligned perioperative planning click or tap here to enter text
Table 4 Traditional and newer methods of coagulation assessment in liver disease and liver transplantation
Assessment method
What It measures?
Key findings
Clinical utility
Major limitations
Ref.
Prothrombin time (PT)Extrinsic and common pathway clotting factorsProlonged due to reduced procoagulant factor synthesisHistorically used to assess bleeding riskDoes not account for reduced anticoagulants; poor bleeding predictor[88,89]
International normalized ratio (INR)Standardized PT (warfarin-based)Elevated despite thrombotic riskNot validated for bleeding riskMisleading INR[90-92]
Platelet countPlatelet quantityThrombocytopenia common but bleeding unpredictableBaseline assessmentDoes not reflect platelet function[93]
aPTTIntrinsic pathway (kaolin-based)Often prolonged; kaolin-based activationScreening testPoor correlation with actual coagulation status[94]
Fibrinogen (Clauss)Functional fibrinogen levelMay be low, normal, or high depending on disease stageGuides cryoprecipitate useDoes not detect dysfibrinogenemia[95]
D-dimerFibrin degradationOften elevated regardless of bleedingMarker of fibrinolysisPoor specificity in cirrhosis[89]
Static plasma-based testingTraditional labs (combined)Fail to predict bleeding vs thrombosisPreoperative screeningCannot reflect “rebalanced hemostasis”[96]
Table 5 Topical and mechanical hemostatic agents
Sub-class
Works on
Feature
Limitation
Ref.
Fibrin-based liquid adhesives: Tisseel, evicelBroad oozing surfaces, vascular anastomoses, coagulopathic patientsProvide fibrinogen + thrombin: Fibrin clot formationAir embolism with spray, intravascular thrombosis, viral transmission risk[130,131]
Fibrin patches/sponges: TachoSil, evarrest, fibrin padSevere bleeding, liver resection, cardiac surgeryAdhesive + mechanical scaffold prevents streaming effectSevere bleeding, liver resection, cardiac surgery[132-135]
Thrombin-only agents: Human thrombin, bovine thrombin, recombinant thrombinAdjunct to surgical hemostasisConverts fibrinogen to fibrinImmunogenicity, thrombosis, viral risk (plasma-derived)[13,137]
Flowable gelatin and thrombin: Floseal, surgifloRapid hemostasis across specialtiesMechanical matrix + active clot formationSwelling, infection, compression injury[138-141]
Table 6 Topical synthetic hemostatic agents
Sub-class
Works on
Feature
Limitation
Ref.
Cyanoacrylates (Octyl-2, Butyl-2)Moisture-induced polymerization forming tissue adhesionRapid sealant, waterproof, sutureless closure; used for skin wounds and variceal embolizationEmbolic risk if intravascular; toxic degradation products; unsuitable for mucosa, joints, avulsed tissue, or vascular anastomoses[142-144]
Microporous polysaccharide hemospheresAbsorb fluid to concentrate platelets and clotting proteinsAccelerates endogenous clotting; reduces time to hemostasisIneffective in severe coagulopathy; limited efficacy in high-pressure bleeding[145]
PEG hydrogel (CoSeal)Cross-linked hydrogel sealing tissue planesSealant and anti-adhesion barrier; non-exothermic, low inflammation; reduces pericardial adhesionsSwelling may compress adjacent structures; poor adhesion to renal parenchyma[146]
Glutaraldehyde cross-linked albumin (BioGlue)Protein cross-linking forming rigid adhesive scaffoldStrong adhesion to tissue and synthetic grafts; useful in vascular/cardiac surgeryTissue toxicity, stenosis risk; avoided in young patients[147-149]
Synthetic hemostatic nanomoleculesCationic interaction enhances platelet aggregationRapid hemostasis in experimental liver and trauma modelsPredominantly preclinical; limited human safety data[149-151]
Table 7 External hemostatic dressings
Sub-class
Works by
Feature
Limitation
Ref.
Fibrinogen-based dressingsDirect fibrin clot formation independent of host coagulationEffective even in hypothermia and coagulopathy; useful for open woundsLimited availability; biological product considerations[152]
Zeolite-based dressings (QuikClot®, ACS)Absorb water to concentrate clotting factors and cellsRapid hemostasis in trauma; effective in junctional hemorrhageExothermic reaction; thermal injury, difficult removal, ineffective in arterial bleeding[153-155]
Clay-based dressingsSurface charge–mediated activation of intrinsic pathwayThermally stable; high surface area, ion exchange capabilityVariable swelling, material-specific inflammatory risk[156]
Kaolin-based dressings (QuikClot Combat Gauze®)Contact activation of intrinsic coagulation (factors XII, XI)No exothermic injury; strong clinical evidence; standard military useLimited efficacy in massive arterial bleeding[157]
Smectite-based dressings (e.g., WoundStat®)Water absorption and intrinsic pathway activationHigh absorption, swelling, and viscosity; effective hemostasisSevere inflammation, tissue necrosis; difficult removal; withdrawn from use[158]
Chitin/chitosan-based dressingsElectrostatic interaction with erythrocytes and platelets (coagulation-independent)Effective in coagulopathy, antimicrobial, biocompatibleExpensive; shellfish allergy concern; requires training for optimal use[159,160]
Polyelectrolyte complexes (chitosan-based PECs)Electrostatic polymer interactions accelerating coagulationRapid clotting; antimicrobial activity; good tissue compatibilityLargely experimental; limited human clinical data[161]
Chitosan bandages (HemCon®)Mechanical sealing and tissue adhesionProven antimicrobial propertiesRequires hands-on training, adhesion may be difficult in emergencies[162]


Write to the Help Desk