BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118655
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118655
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the two groups, n (%)
Variable
Surgical group (n = 85)
Non-surgical group (n = 35)
χ2/t
P value
Age (years)46.58 ± 4.2146.70 ± 4.35
Gender0.2250.635
    Male29 (32.00)12 (34.29)
    Female56 (68.00)23 (65.71)
BMI21.51 ± 2.1021.64 ± 2.21
History of diabetes0.3000.584
    Yes11 (12.94)5 (14.29)
    No74 (87.06)30 (85.71)
History of hypertension0.2040.652
    Yes29 (34.12)11 (31.43)
    No56 (65.88)24 (68.57)
Tumor location0.4290.807
    Upper chest22 (25.88)10 (28.57)
    Mid- chest45 (52.94)18 (51.43)
    Lower chest18 (21.18)7 (20.00)
Clinical staging76.960< 0.001
    Phase I10 (11.76)0 (0.00)
    Phase II35 (41.18)4 (11.43)
    Phase III38 (44.71)13 (37.14)
    Phase IV2 (2.35)18 (51.43)
Pathological types2.1990.138
    Adenocarcinoma73 (85.88)28 (80.00)
    Squamous cell carcinoma12 (14.12)7 (20.00)
Table 2 Thyroid nodule ultrasonography features in the two groups are compared, n (%)
Ultrasound characteristics
Surgical group (n = 85)
Non-surgical group (n = 35)
χ2/t
P value
Nodule characteristics14.587< 0.001
    Cystic34 (40.00)5 (14.29)
    Reality51 (60.00)30 (85.71)
Internal echo9.3470.002
    Equal/high echo28 (32.94)3 (8.57)
    Low echo57 (67.06)32 (91.43)
Calcification0.1340.715
    Have20 (23.53)7 (20.00)
    None65 (76.47)28 (80.00)
Nodule boundary11.3350.001
    Clear54 (63.53)13 (37.14)
    Vague31 (36.47)22 (62.86)
Aspect ratio10.5380.001
    ≥ 121 (24.71)18 (51.43)
    < 164 (75.29)17 (48.57)
Table 3 Comparison of the two groups' ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy results, n (%)
Bethesda rating
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Category V
Category VI
V-VI categories
Surgical group (n = 85)3 (3.53)68 (80.00)6 (70.59)2 (2.35)4 (4.71)2 (2.35)6 (7.06)
Non-surgical group (n = 35)2 (5.71)10 (28.57)4 (47.06)2 (5.71)5 (14.29)12 (34.29)17 (48.57)
χ234.135
P value< 0.001
Table 4 Analysis of specific causes in the non-surgical group (n = 35), n (%)
Classification
Number of examples
Stage IV was determined due to clear distant metastases outside the thyroid gland (such as to the liver, lungs, and bones)10 (28.57)
Metastatic cancer was diagnosed through thyroid biopsy15 (42.86)
Due to severe comorbidities/cardiopulmonary inability to tolerate major surgery6 (17.14)
Because the patient or their family subjectively refuses surgery4 (11.43)
Table 5 A multifactorial analysis of the variables influencing the choice to have an esophagectomy
variable
Regression coefficient
SE
Wals
P value
OR value
95%CI
Clinical staging1.4470.39213.646< 0.0014.2511.973-9.162
US-FNAB results1.3160.37412.366< 0.0013.7301.791-7.769
Table 6 The diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancies
US-FNAB inspection
Pathological examination
Total
Malignant
Benign
Malignant18523
Benign29597
Total20100120


Write to the Help Desk