Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 121585
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121585
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121585
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characteristics and baseline disease data between the two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Recurrence group (n = 40) | Nonrecurrence group (n = 260) | χ2/t | P value |
| Sex | 6.909 | 0.006 | ||
| Male | 38 (95.00) | 200 (76.92) | ||
| Female | 2 (5.00) | 60 (23.08) | ||
| Age | 0.934 | 0.627 | ||
| 60-70 years | 12 (30.00) | 61 (23.46) | ||
| 71-80 years | 24 (60.00) | 165 (63.46) | ||
| > 80 years | 4 (10.00) | 34 (13.08) | ||
| Preoperative BMI (kg/m2) | 24.84 ± 2.04 | 22.07 ± 2.16 | 7.605 | < 0.001 |
| Smoking history | 18 (45.00) | 26 (10.00) | 23.276 | < 0.001 |
| Drinking history | 2 (5.00) | 21 (8.08) | 0.389 | 0.533 |
| Hypertension | 17 (42.50) | 119 (45.77) | 0.150 | 0.699 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 6 (15.00) | 32 (12.31) | 0.227 | 0.634 |
| Coronary heart disease | 3 (7.50) | 20 (7.69) | 0.077 | 0.782 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 20 (50.00) | 136 (52.31) | 0.074 | 0.786 |
| Unilateral hernia | 34 (85.00) | 206 (79.23) | 0.721 | 0.396 |
| Bilateral hernia | 6 (15.00) | 54 (20.77) | ||
| Chronic constipation | 12 (30.00) | 25 (9.62) | 11.504 | 0.001 |
| Hernia type | 0.366 | 0.833 | ||
| Indirect hernia | 31 (77.50) | 201 (77.31) | ||
| Direct hernia | 6 (15.00) | 33 (12.69) | ||
| Combined hernia | 3 (7.50) | 26 (10.00) | ||
| Hernia sac adhesion | 0.752 | 0.386 | ||
| Mild | 35 (87.50) | 213 (81.92) | ||
| Moderate-to-severe | 5 (12.50) | 47 (18.08) | ||
| Incarcerated hernia | 14 (35.00) | 18 (6.92) | 25.808 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of surgical outcomes between the two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| General data | Recurrence group (n = 40) | Nonrecurrence group (n = 260) | χ2/t | P value |
| Emergency surgery | 18 (45.00) | 118 (45.38) | 0.002 | 0.964 |
| Anesthesia method | 0.140 | 0.708 | ||
| Intraspinal anesthesia | 26 (65.00) | 161 (61.92) | ||
| Local infiltration anesthesia | 14 (35.00) | 99 (38.08) | ||
| Operation time (minutes) | 78.81 ± 12.14 | 80.06 ± 14.75 | 0.510 | 0.611 |
| Mesh type | 14.535 | < 0.001 | ||
| Polypropylene mesh | 11 (27.50) | 18 (6.92) | ||
| Polytetrafluoroethylene mesh | 29 (72.50) | 242 (93.08) | ||
| Mesh size | 0.038 | 0.845 | ||
| 8 cm × 12 cm | 6 (15.00) | 36 (13.85) | ||
| 10 cm × 15 cm | 8 (20.00) | 58 (22.31) | ||
| 12 cm × 15 cm | 18 (45.00) | 121 (46.54) | ||
| 15 cm × 15 cm | 8 (20.00) | 45 (17.31) | ||
| Chronic postoperative pain | 3 (7.50) | 28 (10.77) | 0.400 | 0.527 |
| Postoperative hematoma | 4 (10.00) | 30 (11.54) | 0.003 | 0.986 |
| Postoperative infection | 1 (2.50) | 3 (1.15) | 0.002 | 0.961 |
Table 3 Assignment analysis
| Variable | Assignment |
| Sex | Male = 1, female = 0 |
| Preoperative BMI | Continuous variable |
| Smoking history | Yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Chronic constipation | Yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Incarcerated hernia | Yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Polypropylene mesh patch | Yes = 1, no = 0 |
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis
| Risk factor | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI |
| Male | 0.953 | 0.305 | 9.763 | 0.001 | 2.593 | 1.846-3.641 |
| Preoperative BMI | 0.588 | 0.236 | 6.208 | 0.008 | 1.800 | 1.147-2.826 |
| Smoking history | 0.739 | 0.282 | 6.867 | 0.006 | 2.093 | 1.392-3.147 |
| Chronic constipation | 1.150 | 0.406 | 8.023 | 0.002 | 3.159 | 2.104-4.742 |
| Incarcerated hernia | 0.856 | 0.305 | 7.877 | 0.004 | 2.353 | 1.748-3.168 |
| Polypropylene mesh patch | 0.709 | 0.281 | 6.366 | 0.008 | 2.031 | 1.500-2.751 |
Table 5 Clinical efficacy of the postoperative recurrence risk prediction model
| Item | AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity | Specificity |
| Training set | 0.895 | 0.831-0.959 | 75.90% | 88.50% |
| Validation set | 0.933 | 0.828-1.000 | 81.80% | 83.10% |
- Citation: Cao CP, Xiong H, Zhu ZH, Zhang JP. Clinical prediction model for inguinal hernia recurrence risk after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair surgery in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 121585
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i10/121585.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.121585