Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 120304
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120304
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120304
Table 1 Single-modality navigation technology and application scenarios
| Navigation technology | Core strengths | Main application scenarios | Clinical value |
| IOUS | Real-time imaging, radiation-free, easy to operate, low cost, and clear visualization of deep structures | Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery | Locate deep-seated lesions; demonstrate the adjacency relationship between lesions and blood vessels/bile ducts; reduce the positive margin rate |
| ICG-fluorescence imaging | Real-time fluorescence imaging, capable of displaying boundaries/perfusion/Lymph nodes/blood vessels | Hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal, breast and hernia surgery | Tumor boundary visualization; hepatic segment division; anastomotic perfusion assessment; sentinel lymph node biopsy; intraoperative vascular protection |
| X-ray | Rapid imaging, widespread equipment availability | Biliary surgery, vascular surgery | Cholangiography and stone localization, vascular surgical intervention |
| Gastrointestinal endoscopy | Direct visualization inside the cavity, localization of minor lesions, and assessment of anastomotic stoma | Gastrointestinal surgery | Mark tumor margins; reduce residual lesions; evaluate anastomosis and guide reinforced suturing; lower the risk of anastomotic leakage |
| Ultrasound elastography | Assess tissue stiffness | Thyroid surgery, breast surgery | Differentiate benign and malignant nodules; guide the scope of surgical resection |
Table 2 Definitions and core functions of digital technologies in surgical navigation
| Technology | Definition | Core function |
| 3D reconstruction | A digital imaging technique that reconstructs 3D tomographic data such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging into 3D spatial models using computer algorithms | (1) Visualization of complex anatomical structures; (2) Preoperative surgical planning and simulation; (3) Navigation guidance during surgery; and (4) Improved communication and teaching |
| 3D printing | A digital manufacturing technology that converts 3D virtual models into physical | More intuitive than 3D reconstruction |
| AI | A data-driven technology that uses algorithms to analyze medical images, identify lesions, and optimize surgical decisions, with self-learning and adaptive capabilities | (1) Automatically segment lesions and distinguish benign/malignant nodules; and (2) Predict surgical risks and optimize operation plans |
| XR | An umbrella term for extended reality technologies, integrating VR, AR, and MR to realize the fusion of virtual information and real surgical scenes, with immersive and interactive characteristics | / |
| AR | A technology that overlays virtual information (e.g., 3D anatomical models, surgical plans) onto the real surgical field, realizing real-time fusion of virtual and real images | (1) Visualize deep anatomical structures (e.g., bile duct, nerve, blood vessels); (2) Assist in accurate positioning of lesions and clear surgical boundaries; and (3) Improve the visualization effect of intraoperative navigation |
| VR | A technology that constructs a realistic virtual surgical environment based on patient-specific anatomical data | (1) Simulate surgical procedures and optimize surgical planning; (2) Display anatomical structures to assist surgeons in understanding intraoperative anatomy; and (3) Provide a platform for surgical training |
| MR | A mixed reality technology that fuses virtual anatomical models and real surgical scenes, enabling real-time interaction between surgeons and virtual information in the operating field | (1) Realize “perspective” visualization of deep anatomical structures and variations; (2) Support real-time interaction and dynamic adjustment of virtual models; and (3) Assist in protecting vital structures and improving surgical precision |
- Citation: Chen CQ, Zhao ZX. Strengths and weaknesses analysis, individualized selection and future trends of surgical navigation protocols. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 120304
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i10/120304.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120304