Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 106069
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients and resected lesions, n (%)
Experimental group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 46) | P value | |
Age [M, (Q1, Q3), years] | 56.5 (49.0, 64.5) | 58.5 (49.0, 62.0) | 0.994 |
Sex | 0.411 | ||
Male | 21 (47.73) | 18 (39.13) | |
Female | 23 (52.27) | 28 (60.87) | |
Maximum lesion diameter [M, (Q1, Q3), mm] | 29.5 (20.0, 39.0) | 29.5 (20.0, 48.0) | 0.474 |
Lesion location | 0.296 | ||
Fundus of stomach | 18 (40.90) | 26 (56.52) | |
Gastric body | 23 (52.27) | 18 (39.13) | |
Antrum of stomach | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.35) | |
Level of origin of lesion | 0.072 | ||
Not reaching muscularis propria | 3 (6.82) | 0 (0) | |
Muscularis propria | 41 (93.18) | 46 (100) | |
Growth pattern | 0.875 | ||
Intraluminal growth | 3 (6.82) | 3 (6.52) | |
Extraluminal growth | 2 (4.54) | 1 (2.17) | |
Intraluminal and extraluminal growth | 39 (88.64) | 42 (91.30) | |
Pathological type | 0.634 | ||
Stromal tumor | 25 (56.82) | 33 (71.74) | |
Leiomyoma | 10 (22.73) | 6 (13.04) | |
Ectopia pancreas | 2 (4.54) | 1 (2.17) | |
Neurofibroma | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.35) | |
Other | 3 (6.82) | 4 (8.70) |
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Experimental group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 46) | P value | |
Complete wound closure | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
En bloc resection | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Intraoperative bleeding | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
No | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
Gas complication | |||
Subcutaneous emphysema | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Pneumomediastinum | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Severe pneumothorax | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Severe pneumoperitoneum | 1 (2.27) | 12 (26.09) | 0.001 |
Operative time [M, (Q1, Q3), minute] | 29.5 (20.0, 39.0) | 29.5 (20.0, 48.0) | 0.474 |
Intraoperative traction | 0.673 | ||
Yes | 8 (18.18) | 10 (21.74) | |
No | 36 (81.82) | 36 (78.26) | |
Complete lesion removal | 0.975 | ||
Yes | 43 (97.73) | 45 (97.83) | |
No | 1 (2.27) | 1 (2.17) |
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Experimental group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 46) | P value | |
Postoperative CRP [M, (Q1, Q3), mg/L] | 17.98 (7.3, 34.2) | 30.8 (16.1, 47.1) | 0.066 |
Postoperative white blood cell count [M, (Q1, Q3), 109/L] | 8.9 (7.9, 11.2) | 10.6 (9.0, 13.0) | 0.069 |
Postoperative neutrophil percentage [M, (Q1, Q3), %] | 81.7 (75.7, 84.9) | 82.4 (76.7, 84.7) | 0.577 |
Postoperative maximum body temperature [M, (Q1, Q3), °C] | 36.8 (36.7, 36.9) | 36.8 (36.8, 37.5) | 0.149 |
NRS 1 day postoperative [M, (Q1, Q3), points] | 3 (2, 3.6) | 4 (3, 5) | < 0.001 |
NRS 4 days postoperative [M, (Q1, Q3), points] | 1 (1, 2.0) | 2 (1, 2.3) | < 0.001 |
Delayed postoperative bleeding | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
No | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
Delayed postoperative perforation | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
No | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
Postoperative infection | 0.008 | ||
Yes | 7 (15.91) | 19 (41.30) | |
No | 37 (84.09) | 27 (58.70) | |
The days of use antibiotic [M, (Q1, Q3), day] | 3.5 (1.3, 5) | 5 (3.8, 6) | 0.013 |
Postoperative hospital stays [M, (Q1, Q3), day] | 6 (5, 7) | 6 (5, 7) | 0.314 |
Total hospitalization costs [M, (Q1, Q3), CNY] | 19843.3 (18361.6, 22260.5) | 20862.5 (19475.0, 24398.3) | 0.075 |
- Citation: Zhang M, Liu J, Dong YP, Zhao Q, Lin ML, Gao TJ, Feng JL, Wang YF, Guo YF, Wang Z, Jia W, Yang Z. Comparison between interrupted closure technique and traditional closure technique in endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating gastric subepithelial lesions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 106069
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/106069.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069