Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 103340
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103340
Table 1 Demographics of patients undergoing gastrectomy, mean ± SD/n (%)
Parameters
Routine group (n = 156)
ERAS-C group (n = 166)
t/χ²
P value
Gender (male/female)107 (68.59)/49 (31.41)109 (65.66)/57 (34.34)0.3120.576
Age (years)70.84 ± 10.1769.66 ± 10.121.0430.298
BMI (kg/m²)22.12 ± 3.4022.51 ± 3.111.0700.285
Degree of education0.8740.928
Junior high school and below68 (43.59)73 (43.98)
Technical secondary school36 (23.08)40 (24.10)
High school30 (19.23)26 (15.66)
Junior college13 (8.33)16 (9.64)
University and above9 (5.77)11 (6.63)
Smoking history59 (37.82)54 (32.53)0.9880.320
Drinking history71 (45.51)67 (40.36)0.8710.351
Employment113 (72.44)121 (72.89)0.0080.927
Diabetes52 (33.33)50 (30.12)0.3840.536
Hypertension111 (71.15)116 (69.88)0.0630.802
Residence area (town/rural)85 (54.49)/71 (45.51)93 (56.02)/73 (43.98)0.0770.782
Live alone22 (14.10)19 (11.45)0.5110.475
Tumor location5.5380.136
Upper32 (20.51)49 (29.52)
Middle73 (46.79)61 (36.75)
Lower40 (25.64)48 (28.92)
Remnant stomach11 (7.05)8 (4.82)
Clinical TNM stage0.3630.834
I11 (7.05)14 (8.43)
II105 (67.31)107 (64.46)
III40 (25.64)45 (27.11)
Table 2 Comparison of operative and pathological stages between two groups of patients, mean ± SD/n (%)
Parameters
Routine group (n = 156)
ERAS-C group (n = 166)
t/χ²
P value
Tumor histology (Lauren)5.4740.065
Intestinal85 (54.49)100 (60.24)
Diffuse22 (14.10)32 (19.28)
Others49 (31.41)34 (20.48)
Type of gastrectomy5.7290.220
Total (including completion)41 (26.28)46 (27.71)
Distal85 (54.49)79 (47.59)
Proximal1 (0.64)5 (3.01)
Pylorus-preserving15 (9.62)25 (15.06)
Other14 (8.97)11 (6.63)
Open approach134 (85.90)132 (79.52)2.2780.131
Operative time (minutes)298.31 ± 40.94300.14 ± 45.680.3770.706
Length of postoperative stay (days)13.85 ± 3.6914.32 ± 3.111.2450.214
Table 3 Comparison of complication status within one postoperative month between two groups of patients, n (%)
Parameters
Routine group (n = 156)
ERAS-C group (n = 166)
χ²
P value
Overall complications18 (11.54)9 (5.42)3.9170.048
Major complications9 (5.77)2 (1.20)5.0780.024
Pulmonary embolism1 (0.64)0 (0.00)
Anastomosis leakage4 (2.56)1 (0.60)
Intra-abdominal bleeding2 (1.28)0 (0.00)
Intra-abdominal abscess2 (1.28)1 (0.60)
Minor complications9 (5.77)7 (4.22)0.4100.522
Wound infection2 (1.28)2 (1.20)
Ileus4 (2.56)3 (1.81)
Urinary tract infection2 (1.28)1 (0.60)
Atelectasis1 (0.64)1 (0.60)
Table 4 Comparison of nursing satisfaction one month postoperatively between the two groups, mean ± SD
Parameters
Routine group (n = 156)
ERAS-C group (n = 166)
t value
P value
Technical service quality18.27 ± 1.4418.16 ± 1.150.7550.451
Nurses’ interpersonal communication ability9.01 ± 0.679.24 ± 0.633.3010.001
Nurse-patient communication level9.25 ± 0.589.57 ± 0.744.396< 0.001
Service economy8.33 ± 1.568.45 ± 1.340.7380.461
Service timeliness8.85 ± 1.209.36 ± 1.034.130< 0.001
Service accessibility16.98 ± 1.3417.35 ± 1.572.2740.024
Total75.23 ± 7.0380.36 ± 7.246.450< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of quality of life one month postoperatively between the two groups, mean ± SD
Parameters
Routine group (n = 156)
ERAS-C group (n = 166)
t value
P value
Dysphagia20.26 ± 3.7719.18 ± 2.542.9920.003
Pain25.77 ± 3.4924.74 ± 3.682.5850.010
Eating restrictions22.18 ± 2.8519.96 ± 1.778.335< 0.001
Anxiety40.52 ± 6.9838.67 ± 3.462.9770.003
Dry mouth30.66 ± 5.4328.72 ± 2.154.166< 0.001
Body image40.03 ± 4.1538.96 ± 2.542.7600.006