Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 103078
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103078
Table 1 Clinical and utilization outcomes of appendectomy alone vs Meckel diverticulectomy with appendectomy

Appendectomy alone (n = 460)
Meckel + appendectomy (n = 244)
P value
Age (years)39.6 ± 16.9 38.9 ± 15.9
Operative time (mins)53.4 ± 26.966.2 ± 28.5< 0.001
Total hospital length of stay (days)2.8 ± 3.74.1 ± 3.9< 0.001
Re-operation, n (%)5 (1.1)7 (3.3)0.072
30-day mortality, n (%)1 (0.1)01.000
Table 2 Rate of postoperative infectious complications for appendectomy alone vs Meckel diverticulectomy with appendectomy, n (%)

Appendectomy alone (n = 460)
Meckel + appendectomy (n = 244)
P value
Superficial surgical site infection9 (2.0)4 (1.6)0.776
Deep incisional infection3 (0.7)5 (2.0)0.091
Organ space infection15 (3.3)5 (2.0)0.477
Wound dehiscence00-
Pneumonia6 (1.3)1 (0.4)0.432
Urinary tract infection2 (0.4)1 (0.4)1.000
Sepsis28 (6.1)7 (3.0)0.071
Septic shock5 (1.0)00.170
Table 3 Rate of postoperative non-infectious complications for appendectomy alone vs Meckel diverticulectomy with appendectomy, n (%)

Appendectomy alone (n = 460)
Meckel + appendectomy (n = 244)
P value
Prolonged ventilation (> 48 h)00-
Unplanned re-intubation1 (0.2)01.000
Progressive renal insufficiency0%0-
Acute renal failure1 (0.2)01.000
Pulmonary embolism2 (0.4)1 (0.4)0.961
Cardiac arrest requiring CPR1 (0.2)01.000
Myocardial infarction 01 (0.4)0.347
DVT requiring therapy 2 (0.4)1 (0.4)1.000
Blood transfusion (intra/postoperative period) 3 (0.7)1 (0.4)1.000