Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline data of patients in the preclosure and non-preclosure groups
Group | Sex (patients) | Age (years) (mean ± SD) | Hypertension (cases) | Diabetes mellitus (case) | History of abdominal surgery (case) | |
Male | Female | |||||
Preclosure group | 22 | 32 | 57.13 ± 10.37 | 13 | 2 | 14 |
Non-preclosure group | 16 | 24 | 54.18 ± 8.44 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
χ2/t value | 0.005 | 1.475 | 1.173 | 0.120 | 0.146 | |
P value | 0.942 | 0.144 | 0.279 | 0.729 | 0.702 |
Table 2 The endoscope and related instruments
Instrument name | Model | Manufacturer |
Gastroscope host | EPK-i7000 | PENTAX |
Electronic upper gastrointestinal endoscope | EG29-i103.2 | PENTAX |
High-frequency electric cutting device | VI200S | ERBE |
CO2 insufflator | UCR | Olympus |
IT knife | KD-612 L | Olympus |
Dual knife | KD-650 L | Olympus |
Transparent cap | D-201-11804 | Olympus |
Thermal biopsy forceps | HDBF-2.4-230-S | COOK |
Injection needle | VIN-23 | COOK |
Electric snare | AG-5072-242523 | AGS MedTech |
Clip device | AG-51042-1950-135-16 | AGS MedTech |
Irrigation pump | MD4-185 | AOHUA |
Table 3 Tumor sites in the two groups of patients
Group | Tumor site [n (%)] | ||||||
Gastric body | Gastric fundus | Fundus-gastric body junction | Posterior wall of the cardia | Ridge between the gastric body and fundus | Gastric angle | Gastric antrum | |
Preclosure group (n = 54) | 19 (35.2) | 32 (59.2) | 3 (5.6) | ||||
Non-preclosure group (n = 40) | 14 (35.0) | 18 (45.0) | 3 (7.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) | 2 (5.0) |
Table 4 Comparison of surgical conditions between the two groups of patients
Group | Wound closure time (min) | Number of titanium clips used (pcs) | Number of fasting days (days) | Length of postoperative hospital stay (days) | Need for an indwelling gastric tube [n (%)] |
Preclosure group (n = 54) | 6.69 ± 2.10 | 8.93 ± 2.23 | 3.61 ± 0.78 | 6.41 ± 1.31 | 9 (16.7) |
Non-preclosure group (n = 40) | 11.65 ± 3.78 | 12.05 ± 4.49 | 3.73 ± 0.84 | 6.13 ± 1.06 | 13 (32.5) |
χ2/t value | 7.479 | 4.043 | 0.672 | 1.116 | 3.213 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.504 | 0.267 | 0.073 |
Table 5 Pathological results for the two groups of patients
Group | Pathological type [n (%)] | ||||||
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | Leiomyoma | Ectopic pancreatic tissue | Calcified fibrous tumor | Spindle cell tumor | Schwannoma | Lipoma | |
Preclosure group (n = 54) | 43 (79.6) | 7 (12.9) | 2 (3.7) | 1 (1.9) | 1 (1.9) | ||
Non-preclosure group (n = 40) | 30 (75.0) | 7 (17.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) |
- Citation: Zu QQ, You Y, Chen AZ, Wang XR, Zhang SH, Chen FL, Liu M. Combined application of the preclosure technique and traction approach facilitates endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 95704
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/95704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704