Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 103740
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103740
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103740
Table 1 Summary of neoadjuvant locoregional therapy studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease | HCC stage/liver function | Treatment arms (n) | Neoadjuvant duration (weeks) | Preoperative stopping time (weeks) | Median follow-up (months) | Primary endpoints findings | Ref. |
Resectable HCC | BCLC A/B exceeding the Milan criteria | Neoadjuvant TACE (82) vs direct surgery (82) | 4-6 | NA | 36 | 1-year OS (97.2% vs 82.4%); 2-year OS (88.4% vs 60.4%); 3-year OS (71.6% vs 45.7%; P = 0.0011) | Fang et al[11] |
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm) | NA | Neoadjuvant TACE (60) vs direct surgery (324) | NA | NA | 24 | DFS (P = 0.935); OS (P = 0.172) | Giannone et al[12] |
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm) | Child-Pugh A/B | Neoadjuvant TACE (30) vs Direct surgery (30) | 12 | NA | 24 | 2-year DFS (P = 0.7045) | Kobayashi et al[13] |
Resectable HCC with PVTT | Child-Pugh A | Neoadjuvant HAIC (65) vs direct surgery (55) | 9.6 | NA | 36 | 1-year OS (94.9% vs 84.6%); 3-year OS (78% vs 47.6%); 5-year OS (66.4% vs 37.2%; P < 0.001) | Hu et al[16] |
Centrally located resectable HCC | Child-Pugh A | Neoadjuvant IMRT (41) vs direct surgery (121) | 5-6 | 4-12 | 45 | 1-year OS (95% vs 82%); 3-year OS (70% vs 64%); 5-year OS (70% vs 54%; P = 0.0099); 1-year DFS (71% vs 52%); 3-year DFS (53% vs 38%); 5-year DFS (37% vs 34%; P = 0.034) | Wei et al[19] |
A single and small (≤ 5 cm) HBV-related resectable HCC | BCLC A | Neoadjuvant IMRT (30) vs direct surgery (30) | NA | 4 | 68 | DFS (P = 0.448) | Salem et al[20] |
Table 2 Summary of neoadjuvant systemic antitumor treatment studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease | HCC stage/liver function | Treatment arms (n) | Neoadjuvant duration (weeks) | Preoperative stopping time (weeks) | Median follow-up (months) | Primary endpoints findings | Ref. |
Resectable HCC | AJCC stage Ib, II, and IIIb | Neoadjuvant cemiplimab (21) | 6 | 4 | NA | Significant tumor necrosis: 20% (4/20) | Marron et al[26] |
Locally advanced resectable HCC | Child-Pugh A | Neoadjuvant cabozantinib + nivolumab (15) | 8 | 4 | 12 | AEs: 93.3% (14/15) | Ho et al[27] |
Resectable HCC | CNLC IIb/IIIa | Neoadjuvant camrelizumab + apatinib (18) | 6 | 7 | 12 | MPR: 17.6% (3/18); pCR: 5.9% (1/18) | Xia et al[28] |
Resectable HCC | Child-Pugh A | Neoadjuvant nivolumab + ipilimumab (14) vs nivolumab (13) | 6 | NA | 24.6 | Grade 3 AEs: 43% (6/14) vs 23% (3/13) | Kaseb et al[29] |
Table 3 Summary of neoadjuvant locoregional combined with systemic antitumor treatment studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease | HCC stage/liver function | Treatment arms (n) | Neoadjuvant duration (weeks) | Preoperative stopping time (weeks) | Median follow-up (months) | Primary endpoints findings | Ref. |
Resectable HCC | BCLC 0-A/CNLC I | Neoadjuvant tislelizumab + SBRT (20) | 4 | 4 | 60 | Delay of surgery: 0; AEs: 100%; Grade 3 AEs: 40% (8/20); Grade 4 or 5 AEs: 0; ORR: 63.2% (12/19); DCR: 100%; pCR: 10.5% (2/19) | Li et al[34] |
Resectable HCC | CNLC II | Neoadjuvant TACE + ICIs (20) | 8-22 | 4 | 24 | ORR: 75.0% (15/20); DCR: 100.0%; 1-year DFS: 86.6%; 1-year OS: 100.0%; 2-year OS: 76.4% | Zhu et al[35] |
Resectable or borderline Resectable HCC | CNLC Ib/IIa/IIIa | Neoadjuvant TACE + tislelizumab (41) vs direct surgery (41) | 6 | 4 | 24 | AEs: 87.8% (36/41); pCR: 31.7% (13/41); MPR: 43.9% (18/41); incidence of MVI: 4.9% | Zhao et al[36] |
Resectable HCC | CNLC Ib-IIIa | Neoadjuvant lenvatinib + ICIs + TACE (24) vs direct surgery (76) | 9 | 3 | 24 | 1-year OS (100% vs 92.1%); 2-year OS (100% vs 48.7%; P = 0.003) | Wu et al[37] |
Resectable HCC with Cheng’s type I/II PVTT | Child-Pugh A | Neoadjuvant TKIs + ICIs + TACE (33) vs direct surgery (105) | 6 | 4 | 60 | 1-year RFS (75.0% vs 55.0%); 3-year RFS (61.3% vs 22.7%); 5-year RFS (61.3% vs 19.9%; P = 0.002) | Hou et al[38] |
Resectable HCC with macrovascular invasion | CNLC IIIa | Neoadjuvant TKIs + ICIs + TACE/HAIC/RT (22) vs direct surgery (40) | 16 | 4 | 24 | RFS (P = 0.046) | Wu et al[39] |
- Citation: Zhang XD, Zhang LY, Luo JL, Yu KH, Zhu KL. Neoadjuvant therapy: Dawn of reducing the high post-surgery recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 103740
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/103740.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103740