Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 103740
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103740
Table 1 Summary of neoadjuvant locoregional therapy studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease
HCC stage/liver function
Treatment arms (n)
Neoadjuvant duration (weeks)
Preoperative stopping time (weeks)
Median follow-up (months)
Primary endpoints findings
Ref.
Resectable HCCBCLC A/B exceeding the Milan criteriaNeoadjuvant TACE (82) vs direct surgery (82)4-6NA361-year OS (97.2% vs 82.4%); 2-year OS (88.4% vs 60.4%); 3-year OS (71.6% vs 45.7%; P = 0.0011)Fang et al[11]
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm)NANeoadjuvant TACE (60) vs direct surgery (324)NANA24DFS (P = 0.935); OS (P = 0.172)Giannone et al[12]
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm)Child-Pugh A/BNeoadjuvant TACE (30) vs Direct surgery (30)12NA242-year DFS (P = 0.7045)Kobayashi et al[13]
Resectable HCC with PVTTChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant HAIC (65) vs direct surgery (55)9.6 NA361-year OS (94.9% vs 84.6%); 3-year OS (78% vs 47.6%); 5-year OS (66.4% vs 37.2%; P < 0.001)Hu et al[16]
Centrally located resectable HCCChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant IMRT (41) vs direct surgery (121)5-64-12451-year OS (95% vs 82%); 3-year OS (70% vs 64%); 5-year OS (70% vs 54%; P = 0.0099); 1-year DFS (71% vs 52%); 3-year DFS (53% vs 38%); 5-year DFS (37% vs 34%; P = 0.034)Wei et al[19]
A single and small (≤ 5 cm) HBV-related resectable HCCBCLC ANeoadjuvant IMRT (30) vs direct surgery (30)NA468DFS (P = 0.448)Salem et al[20]
Table 2 Summary of neoadjuvant systemic antitumor treatment studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease
HCC stage/liver function
Treatment arms (n)
Neoadjuvant duration (weeks)
Preoperative stopping time (weeks)
Median follow-up (months)
Primary endpoints findings
Ref.
Resectable HCCAJCC stage Ib, II, and IIIbNeoadjuvant cemiplimab (21)64NASignificant tumor necrosis: 20% (4/20)Marron et al[26]
Locally advanced resectable HCCChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant cabozantinib + nivolumab (15)8412AEs: 93.3% (14/15)Ho et al[27]
Resectable HCCCNLC IIb/IIIaNeoadjuvant camrelizumab + apatinib (18)6712MPR: 17.6% (3/18); pCR: 5.9% (1/18)Xia et al[28]
Resectable HCCChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant nivolumab + ipilimumab (14) vs nivolumab (13)6NA24.6Grade 3 AEs: 43% (6/14) vs 23% (3/13)Kaseb et al[29]
Table 3 Summary of neoadjuvant locoregional combined with systemic antitumor treatment studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease
HCC stage/liver function
Treatment arms (n)
Neoadjuvant duration (weeks)
Preoperative stopping time (weeks)
Median follow-up (months)
Primary endpoints findings
Ref.
Resectable HCCBCLC 0-A/CNLC INeoadjuvant tislelizumab + SBRT (20)4460Delay of surgery: 0; AEs: 100%; Grade 3 AEs: 40% (8/20); Grade 4 or 5 AEs: 0; ORR: 63.2% (12/19); DCR: 100%; pCR: 10.5% (2/19)Li et al[34]
Resectable HCCCNLC IINeoadjuvant TACE + ICIs (20)8-22424ORR: 75.0% (15/20); DCR: 100.0%; 1-year DFS: 86.6%; 1-year OS: 100.0%; 2-year OS: 76.4%Zhu et al[35]
Resectable or borderline Resectable HCCCNLC Ib/IIa/IIIaNeoadjuvant TACE + tislelizumab (41) vs direct surgery (41)6424AEs: 87.8% (36/41); pCR: 31.7% (13/41); MPR: 43.9% (18/41); incidence of MVI: 4.9%Zhao et al[36]
Resectable HCCCNLC Ib-IIIaNeoadjuvant lenvatinib + ICIs + TACE (24) vs direct surgery (76)93241-year OS (100% vs 92.1%); 2-year OS (100% vs 48.7%; P = 0.003)Wu et al[37]
Resectable HCC with Cheng’s type I/II PVTTChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant TKIs + ICIs + TACE (33) vs direct surgery (105)64601-year RFS (75.0% vs 55.0%); 3-year RFS (61.3% vs 22.7%); 5-year RFS (61.3% vs 19.9%; P = 0.002)Hou et al[38]
Resectable HCC with macrovascular invasionCNLC IIIaNeoadjuvant TKIs + ICIs + TACE/HAIC/RT (22) vs direct surgery (40)16 424RFS (P = 0.046)Wu et al[39]