Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100820
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100820
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100820
Table 1 Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the study population characteristic
Characteristic | n (%) |
Age, years | |
< 60 | 98 (39.2) |
≥ 60 | 152 (60.8) |
Sex | |
Male | 146 (58.4) |
Female | 104 (41.6) |
Tumor location | |
Upper rectum | 62 (24.8) |
Middle rectum | 103 (41.2) |
Lower rectum | 85 (34.0) |
Clinical stage | |
I | 45 (18.0) |
II | 78 (31.2) |
III | 92 (36.8) |
IV | 35 (14.0) |
Histological type | |
Adenocarcinoma | 228 (91.2) |
Mucinous | 18 (7.2) |
Signet ring cell | 4 (1.6) |
Differentiation | |
Well | 32 (12.8) |
Moderate | 165 (66.0) |
Poor | 53 (21.2) |
Table 2 Preoperative serum levels of tumor markers tumor marker
Tumor marker | Median (IQR) | Elevated, n (%) |
AFP (ng/mL) | 3.2 (1.8-5.7) | 18 (7.2) |
CEA (ng/mL) | 4.8 (2.3-12.6) | 122 (48.8) |
CA125 (U/mL) | 16.5 (9.8-28.3) | 45 (18.0) |
CA19-9 (U/mL) | 18.7 (8.9-42.1) | 62 (24.8) |
CA15-3 (U/mL) | 15.3 (10.1-23.8) | 28 (11.2) |
CA72-4 (U/mL) | 3.8 (1.9-8.2) | 52 (20.8) |
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of tumor markers, %
Marker/combination | AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
CEA | 0.78 (0.73-0.83) | 68.4 | 82.1 | 79.5 | 71.8 |
CA19-9 | 0.71 (0.65-0.77) | 52.8 | 85.3 | 78.2 | 64.1 |
CA72-4 | 0.69 (0.63-0.75) | 48.0 | 87.6 | 79.3 | 62.4 |
CA125 | 0.65 (0.59-0.71) | 42.4 | 86.9 | 76.2 | 60.1 |
CA15-3 | 0.61 (0.55-0.67) | 36.8 | 88.5 | 76.1 | 58.3 |
AFP | 0.57 (0.51-0.63) | 22.4 | 92.8 | 75.6 | 54.9 |
CEA + CA19-9 | 0.84 (0.79-0.89) | 76.8 | 79.3 | 78.7 | 77.5 |
CEA + CA72-4 | 0.82 (0.77-0.87) | 74.4 | 80.6 | 79.3 | 75.9 |
CEA + CA19-9 + CA72-4 | 0.87 (0.83-0.91) | 81.2 | 77.8 | 78.5 | 80.6 |
Table 4 Correlation between tumor marker levels and clinicopathological features
Feature | CEA | CA19-9 | CA72-4 | CA125 | CA15-3 | AFP |
Tumor stage | P < 0.001 | P = 0.032 | P = 0.028 | P = 0.145 | P = 0.213 | P = 0.678 |
Lymph node involvement | P = 0.002 | P = 0.056 | P = 0.009 | P = 0.087 | P = 0.312 | P = 0.543 |
Distant metastasis | P < 0.001 | P = 0.007 | P = 0.019 | P = 0.098 | P = 0.176 | P = 0.821 |
Tumor differentiation | P = 0.067 | P = 0.018 | P = 0.104 | P = 0.231 | P = 0.289 | P = 0.765 |
Tumor size | P = 0.023 | P = 0.041 | P = 0.013 | P = 0.156 | P = 0.267 | P = 0.612 |
Table 5 Diagnostic performance of tumor marker panel with and without fecal occult blood test panel, %
Panel | AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
CEA + CA19-9 + CA72-4 | 0.87 (0.81-0.93) | 81.2 | 77.8 | 78.5 | 80.6 |
CEA + CA19-9 + CA72-4 + FOBT | 0.91 (0.86-0.96) | 86.5 | 82.3 | 83.1 | 85.8 |
- Citation: Li M, Yuan DH, Yang Z, Lu TX, Zhang L. Retrospective analysis of preoperative tumor marker levels in rectal cancer patients: Implications for diagnosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 100820
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/100820.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100820