Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100185
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100185
Table 1 Comparative analysis of general data, n (%)
Indicators
Research group (n = 102)
Control group (n = 89)
χ²/t
P value
Age (years)48.51 ± 3.5647.62 ± 3.441.7510.082
Weight (kg)58.59 ± 4.3758.81 ± 5.620.3040.762
Sex1.9980.158
Male54 (52.94)38 (42.70)
Female48 (47.06)51 (57.30)
Comorbidities0.5820.445
Hypertension41 (40.20)31 (34.83)
Diabetes mellitus61 (59.80)58 (65.17)
Number of surgical procedures involved (item)1.1630.281
1-264 (62.75)49 (55.06)
3-438 (37.25)40 (44.94)
Habitual water intake (mL)2.0600.560
≤ 50022 (21.57)20 (22.47)
501-150035 (34.31)23 (25.84)
1501-250031 (30.39)29 (32.58)
≥ 250114 (13.73)17 (19.10)
Table 2 Comparative analysis of adverse reactions, n (%)
Indicators
Observation group (n = 102)
Control group (n = 89)
χ²
P value
Palpitations1 (0.98)3 (3.37)
Fatigue2 (1.96)6 (6.74)
Chapped lips0 (0.00)9 (10.11)
Nausea and vomiting1 (0.98)4 (4.49)
Total4 (3.92)22 (24.72)17.481< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of nursing satisfaction after care, n (%)
Indicators
Research group (n = 102)
Control group (n = 89)
χ²
P value
Very satisfied58 (56.86)19 (21.35)
Satisfied39 (38.24)43 (48.31)
Dissatisfied5 (4.90)27 (30.34)
Total satisfaction97 (95.10)62 (69.66)22.051< 0.001