Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 94270
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.94270
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.94270
Table 1 Sample data and observation index data, n (%)
| Cylindrical group | Circular ring group | Cylindrical-circular ring group | P value | |
| Rats, n | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1.00 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | 1.00 |
| Female | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | |
| Operative time (minute) | 12.00 ± 2.29 | 11.05 ± 2.28 | 11.25 ± 2.30 | 0.624 |
| Time to magnet discharge (day) | 4.60 ± 0.97 | 4.50 ± 0.97 | 4.80 ± 1.14 | 0.760 |
| Bursting pressure (mmHg) | 212.80 ± 16.28 | 220.20 ± 14.98 | 217.60 ± 15.51 | 0.567 |
| Anastomotic diameter (mm) | 6.94 ± 0.30 | 6.97 ± 0.37 | 6.87 ± 0.34 | 0.809 |
- Citation: Zhang MM, Shi AH, Muensterer OJ, Uygun I, Lyu Y, Yan XP. Comparative study of cylindrical vs circular ring magnets for colonic anastomosis in rats. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 94270
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/94270.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.94270