Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 103266
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.103266
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.103266
Table 1 Comparison of serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and total bilirubin levels on day 1 post-surgery between the two groups, mean ± SD
Groups | n | PCT (μg/mL) | CRP (mg/L) | TBil (μmol/L) |
Non-pancreatic fistula group | 127 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 106.69 ± 20.46 | 17.69 ± 4.13 |
Pancreatic fistula group | 31 | 0.99 ± 0.33 | 173.14 ± 32.45 | 20.83 ± 4.18 |
t value | 8.020 | 14.266 | 3.786 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Comparison of serum C-reactive protein, pro-calcitonin, and total bilirubin levels on day 1 post-surgery in patients with different grades of pancreatic fistula, mean ± SD
Table 3 Univariate analysis of factors affecting the development of a pancreatic fistula following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, mean ± SD
Factors | Groups | Pancreatic fistula group (n = 31) | Non-pancreatic fistula group (n = 127) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (years) | ≥ 60 | 20 | 71 | 0.756 | 0.384 |
< 60 | 11 | 56 | |||
Sex | Male | 18 | 70 | 0.088 | 0.767 |
Female | 13 | 57 | |||
Diabetes | Yes | 16 | 30 | 9.460 | 0.002 |
No | 15 | 97 | |||
Hypertension | Yes | 6 | 21 | 0.140 | 0.708 |
No | 25 | 106 | |||
Hyperlipidemia | Yes | 13 | 16 | 14.311 | 0.000 |
No | 18 | 111 | |||
Hemoglobin (g/L) | Normal | 29 | 117 | 0.012 | 0.912 |
Descend | 2 | 10 | |||
Albumin (g/L) | Normal | 29 | 121 | 0.004 | 0.949 |
Descend | 2 | 6 | |||
History of abdominal surgery | Yes | 3 | 7 | 0.196 | 0.658 |
No | 28 | 120 | |||
Operative time (hour) | ≤ 3 | 19 | 84 | 0.258 | 0.611 |
> 3 | 12 | 43 | |||
Intraoperative pancreatic injury | Yes | 14 | 16 | 17.177 | 0.000 |
No | 17 | 111 | |||
Combined splenectomy | Yes | 4 | 2 | 4.785 | 0.029 |
No | 27 | 125 | |||
Combined splenectomy and partial pancreatectomy | Yes | 2 | 2 | 0.832 | 0.362 |
No | 29 | 125 | |||
Retro-pancreatic lymph node dissection | Yes | 19 | 60 | 1.967 | 0.161 |
No | 12 | 67 | |||
Scope of gastric resection | Proximal stomach | 4 | 18 | 0.080 | 0.961 |
Distal stomach | 18 | 75 | |||
Whole stomach | 9 | 34 | |||
Post-operative pathological staging | I-II | 12 | 51 | 0.022 | 0.883 |
III-IV | 19 | 76 | |||
Serum PCT level on day 1 post-surgery (g/mL) | 0.99 ± 0.33 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 8.020 | 0.000 | |
Serum CRP level on day 1 post-surgery (mg/L) | 173.14 ± 32.45 | 106.69 ± 20.46 | 14.266 | 0.000 | |
Serum TBil level on day 1 post-surgery (μmol/L) | 20.83 ± 4.18 | 17.69 ± 4.13 | 3.786 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of factors affecting the development of a pancreatic fistula following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Factors | β | SE | Wald χ2 value | OR | P value | 95%CI |
Diabetes | 1.336 | 0.453 | 8.698 | 3.804 | 0.003 | 1.565-9.243 |
Hyperlipidemia | 1.016 | 0.337 | 9.089 | 2.762 | 0.003 | 1.427-5.347 |
Intraoperative pancreatic injury | 1.559 | 0.336 | 18.144 | 21.528 | 0.000 | 2.461-9.185 |
Serum PCT level on day 1 post-surgery | 0.841 | 0.216 | 15.159 | 2.319 | 0.000 | 1.518-3.541 |
Serum CRP level on day 1 post-surgery | 0.461 | 0.049 | 88.514 | 1.586 | 0.000 | 1.440-1.745 |
Table 5 The predictive value of serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and total bilirubin levels for post-surgical pancreatic fistula on day 1 post-surgery
Indicators | Critical value | AUC | 95%CI | P value | Sensitivity | Specificity |
Serum PCT level on day 1 post-surgery | 0.84 | 0.803 | 0.718-0.889 | 0.000 | 74.2 | 83.5 |
Serum CRP level on day 1 post-surgery | 133.83 | 0.792 | 0.697-0.887 | 0.000 | 67.7 | 87.3 |
Serum TBil level on day 1 post-surgery | 20.16 | 0.683 | 0.581-0.785 | 0.002 | 64.5 | 63.8 |
Combination of the three indices | 0.857 | 0.784-0.929 | 0.000 | 87.1 | 76.4 |
- Citation: Yuan JL, Wen X, Xiong P, Pei L. Predictive value of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and total bilirubin levels for pancreatic fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 103266
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/103266.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.103266