Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 99327
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.99327
Table 1 Comparison of pain levels between the two groups (score, mean ± SD)
Group
Status
1 hour after surgery
6 hours after surgery
12 hours after surgery
24 hours after surgery
48 hours after surgery
Observation (n = 54)Tranquillization1.42 ± 0.362.36 ± 0.41a3.15 ± 0.48a3.07 ± 0.50a2.48 ± 0.46a
Activity1.96 ± 0.413.18 ± 0.42a4.82 ± 0.56a4.73 ± 0.63a3.01 ± 0.64a
Control (n = 54)Tranquillization1.45 ± 0.383.17 ± 0.484.20 ± 0.514.08 ± 0.583.27 ± 0.51
Activity2.01 ± 0.484.18 ± 0.505.86 ± 0.675.96 ± 0.724.16 ± 0.82
Table 2 Comparison of the analgesic effects between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
48 hours presses (times)
48-hour consumption (mL)
Effective percentage (%)
Observation (n = 54)2.84 ± 0.7118.28 ± 2.4875.28 ± 3.15
Control (n = 54)4.73 ± 0.6935.48 ± 3.6970.04 ± 3.06
t14.02828.4298.768
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of pain-related factor expression between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupPGE2 (pg/mL)
5-HT (ng/mL)
SP (μg/mL)
Preoperative
24 hours after surgery
Preoperative
24 hours after surgery
Preoperative
24 hours after surgery
Observation (n = 54)98.82 ± 12.07138.84 ± 15.61a121.28 ± 26.36178.82 ± 31.35a0.80 ± 0.211.48 ± 0.23a
Control (n = 54)101.06 ± 15.63169.86 ± 18.82a118.84 ± 27.49226.81 ± 36.71a0.79 ± 0.201.96 ± 0.34a
t0.8349.3230.4717.3050.2538.593
P value0.406< 0.0010.639< 0.0010.800< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Nausea and vomitting
Shiver
Dizzy
Drowsiness
Retention of urine
Respiratory depression
Total
Observation (n = 54)1 (1.85)01 (1.85)1 (1.85)003 (5.56)
Control (n = 54)3 (5.56)2 (3.70)2 (3.70)2 (3.70)1 (1.85)2 (3.70)12 (22.22)
χ26.271
P value0.012