Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 100364
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364
Table 1 Comparison of general data, n (%)
Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | χ2/t | P value |
Age (year) | 61.61 ± 9.26 | 62.98 ± 9.37 | 0.711 | 0.479 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.28 ± 2.68 | 22.95 ± 2.77 | 0.585 | 0.560 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | 3.54 ± 0.75 | 3.48 ± 0.78 | 0.379 | 0.706 |
Tumor distance from the anal margin (cm) | 4.82 ± 1.81 | 4.93 ± 1.81 | 0.294 | 0.769 |
Sex | 0.057 | 0.811 | ||
Male | 28 (63.64) | 33 (66.00) | ||
Female | 16 (36.36) | 17 (34.00) | ||
American Society of Anesthesiologists grading | 3.197 | 0.074 | ||
I | 21 (47.73) | 32 (64.00) | ||
I | 23 (52.27) | 18 (36.00) | ||
Tumor–nodes–metastasis staging | 0.437 | 0.509 | ||
I | 19 (43.18) | 25 (50.00) | ||
II | 25 (56.82) | 25 (50.00) | ||
Pathological type | 0.684 | 0.408 | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 34 (77.27) | 42 (84.00) | ||
Others | 10 (22.73) | 8 (16.00) |
Table 2 Comparison of surgery-related index
Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
Operation time (minute) | 174.95 ± 17.12 | 196.40 ± 21.52 | 5.298 | < 0.001 |
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 64.59 ± 13.01 | 54.50 ± 9.71 | 4.292 | < 0.001 |
Anal exhaust time (hour) | 42.89 ± 9.49 | 36.48 ± 11.53 | 2.919 | 0.004 |
First postoperative ambulation (hour) | 41.34 ± 9.76 | 35.64 ± 9.14 | 2.923 | 0.004 |
Intestinal recovery time (hour) | 59.84 ± 9.62 | 53.20 ± 7.93 | 23.01 | < 0.001 |
Hospitalization time (days) | 12.48 ± 3.30 | 9.94 ± 2.39 | 4.309 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of surgical specimens
Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
Distal incisal margin length (cm) | 2.90 ± 0.78 | 3.40 ± 0.57 | 3.577 | < 0.001 |
Specimen length (mm) | 10.45 ± 2.37 | 12.12 ± 2.27 | 3.486 | < 0.001 |
Number of lymph nodes cleared (n) | 11.18 ± 3.22 | 11.72 ± 3.26 | 0.806 | 0.422 |
Table 4 Comparison of complications, n (%)
Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | χ2 | P value |
Anastomotic bleeding | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.00) | ||
Anastomotic fistula | 1 (2.27) | 1 (2.00) | ||
Ileus | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.00) | ||
Incision infection | 1 (2.27) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Total occurrence | 8 (18.18) | 5 (10.00) | 1.315 | 0.252 |
Table 5 Comparison of Visual Analogue Scale scores at different time points after surgery
Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
12 hours after surgery | 3.91 ± 1.31 | 3.20 ± 1.28 | 2.654 | 0.009 |
24 hours after surgery | 3.98 ± 1.30 | 3.18 ± 1.02 | 3.338 | 0.001 |
36 hours after surgery | 3.05 ± 1.19 | 2.44 ± 1.25 | 2.414 | 0.012 |
- Citation: Lu F, Tan SG, Zuo J, Jiang HH, Wang JH, Jiang YP. Comparative efficacy analysis of laparoscopic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision vs laparoscopic transanal mesorectal excision for low-lying rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 100364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i1/100364.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364