Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 2538-2545
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2538
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2538
Table 1 Patient characteristics and clinical data of patients underwent surgery and improved with conservative treatment
| Surgery group, n = 28 | Conservative group, n = 242 | P value | |
| Age | 41.9 ± 19.8 | 44.8 ± 20.7 | 0.495 |
| Time to visit hospital (hour) | 38.6 ± 70.0 | 37.6 ± 66.1 | 0.453 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 37.8 ± 1.0 | 37.2 ± 0.8 | < 0.001 |
| WBC count (/μL) | 13440.4 ± 4130.1 | 12489.8 ± 3986.3 | 0.325 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 5.9 ± 7.3 | 4.2 ± 5.3 | 0.311 |
| Size of appendix (mm) | 14.0 ± 3.7 | 12.3 ± 4.1 | 0.014 |
Table 2 Area under the curve and optimal cutoff values of clinical data as predictors of resistance to conservative treatment
| Cutoff value | Area under the curve | FPF | TPF | |
| Time to visit hospital (hour) | 22 | 0.5432 | 0.434 | 0.571 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 37.3 | 0.6923 | 0.368 | 0.679 |
| WBC count (/μL) | 15160 | 0.5568 | 0.236 | 0.429 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 4.6 | 0.5584 | 0.351 | 0.500 |
| Size of appendix (mm) | 12 | 0.6409 | 0.533 | 0.786 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for resistance to conservative treatment, n (%)
| | Surgery group, n = 28 | Conservative group, n = 242 | Univariate analysis, P value | Multivariate analysis, P value | Hazard ration |
| Age | |||||
| < 75 | 26 (10.7) | 216 (89.3) | 0.554 | ||
| ≥ 75 | 2 (7.1) | 26 (92.9) | |||
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 12 (11.1) | 96 (88.9) | 0.744 | ||
| Male | 16 (9.9) | 146 (90.1) | |||
| Past history of appendicitis | |||||
| (-) | 25 (11.6) | 190 (88.4) | 0.180 | ||
| (+) | 3 (5.5) | 52 (94.5) | |||
| Rebound pain | |||||
| (-) | 9 (7.8) | 106 (92.2) | 0.238 | ||
| (+) | 19 (12.3) | 136 (87.7) | |||
| Time to visit hospital (hour) | |||||
| < 22 | 12 (8.1) | 137 (81.9) | 0.166 | ||
| ≥ 22 | 16 (13.2) | 105 (86.8) | |||
| Body temperature (°C) | |||||
| < 37.3 | 9 (5.6) | 153 (94.4) | 0.001 | 0.028 | 2.945 |
| ≥ 37.3 | 19 (17.6) | 89 (82.4) | |||
| WBC count (/μL) | |||||
| < 15160 | 16 (8.0) | 185 (92.0) | 0.027 | 0.138 | |
| ≥ 15160 | 12 (17.4) | 57 (82.6) | |||
| CRP (mg/dL) | |||||
| < 4.6 | 14 (8.2) | 157 (91.8) | 0.122 | ||
| ≥ 4.6 | 14 (14.1) | 85 (85.9) | |||
| Size of appendix (mm) | |||||
| < 12 | 6 (5.0) | 113 (95.0) | 0.011 | 0.600 | |
| ≥ 12 | 22 (14.6) | 129 (85.4) | |||
| Stranding of the adjacent fat | |||||
| (-) | 1 (1.3) | 79 (98.7) | 0.001 | 0.162 | |
| (+) | 27 (16.6) | 163 (83.4) | |||
| Periappendiceal fluid | |||||
| (-) | 19 (8.4) | 206 (91.6) | 0.020 | 0.892 | |
| (+) | 9 (20.0) | 36 (80.0) | |||
| Air in appendix | |||||
| (-) | 22 (8.9) | 224 (81.1) | 0.014 | 0.164 | |
| (+) | 6 (25.0) | 18 (75.0) | |||
| Abscess | |||||
| (-) | 24 (9.4) | 230 (80.6) | 0.048 | 0.083 | |
| (+) | 4 (25.0) | 12 (75.0) | |||
| Appendicolith | |||||
| (-) | 9 (5.1) | 167 (94.9) | < 0.001 | 0.008 | 3.746 |
| (+) | 19 (20.2) | 75 (79.8) | |||
| Douglas sinus fluid | |||||
| (-) | 17 (7.7) | 203 (92.3) | 0.003 | 0.016 | 3.580 |
| (+) | 11 (22.0) | 39 (78.0) | |||
| Antibiotics | |||||
| Second-generation cephems | 14 (7.3) | 178 (92.7) | 0.009 | 0.260 | |
| Broad-spectrum | 14 (17.9) | 64 (82.1) |
Table 4 Probability of resistance to conservative treatment by number of risk factors, n (%)
| Number of risk factors | Total number | Surgery |
| 0 factor | 92 | 2 (2.2) |
| 1 factor | ||
| Body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C | 55 | 4 (7.3) |
| Douglas sinus fluid | 20 | 2 (10.0) |
| Appendicolith | 38 | 3 (7.9) |
| 2 factors | ||
| Douglas sinus fluid + body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C | 9 | 1 (11.1) |
| Douglas sinus fluid + appendicolith | 12 | 2 (16.7) |
| Appendicolith + body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C | 35 | 8 (22.9) |
| 3 factors | 9 | 6 (66.7) |
- Citation: Hosokawa Y, Moritani M, Makuuchi Y, Nagakawa Y. Indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(8): 2538-2545
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i8/2538.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2538
