Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 2511-2520
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2511
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2511
Table 1 Comparison of pathological data between two groups of gastric cancer patients
Project | LVI/PNI positive group (n = 42) | LVI/PNI negative group (n = 20) | χ2 | P value |
Position | 2.71 | 0.438 | ||
Cardia | 9 | 7 | ||
Gastric fundus | 2 | 2 | ||
Gastric body | 13 | 6 | ||
Gastric antrum | 18 | 5 | ||
Differentiation | 5.08 | 0.079 | ||
High | 2 | 3 | ||
Middle | 9 | 8 | ||
Low | 31 | 9 | ||
Lauren typing | 2.44 | 0.296 | ||
Diffuse | 21 | 6 | ||
Intestinal | 12 | 9 | ||
Mixed type | 9 | 5 | ||
Lymph node metastasis | 37.58 | < 0.001 | ||
Yes | 39 | 3 | ||
No | 3 | 17 |
Table 2 Comparison of energy spectrum computed tomography parameters between two groups of gastric cancer patients
Project | LVI/PNI positive group (n = 42) | LVI/PNI negative group (n = 20) | T/Z | P value |
Arterial phase | ||||
CT (HU) | 196.5 ± 52.7 | 150.7 ± 33.9 | 3.55 | 0.001 |
CT (HU) | 87.3 ± 19.2 | 66.4 ± 13.1 | 4.4 | < 0.00 |
Ka3m) | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.96 | 0.004 |
IC (× 100 μg/cm³) | 19.4 ± 6.1 | 14.9 ± 3.8 | 2.96 | 0.004 |
NIC | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 2.46 | 0.019 |
Venous phase | ||||
CT4 (HU) | 242.6 ± 30.4 | 203.1 ± 27.8 | 5.06 | < 0.001 |
CT (HU) | 103.4 ± 13.3 | 81.4 ± 11.7 | 6.62 | < 0.001 |
K4n.m | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 3.58 | 0.001 |
IC (× 100 μg/cm³) | 23.9 (22.4, 27.1) | 22.2 (18.9, 23.2) | -3.06 | 0.002 |
NIC | 0.5 (0.5, 0.6) | 0.4 (0.4, 0.5) | -3.10 | 0.002 |
Delay period | ||||
CT (HU) | 185.0 ± 26.6 | 179.4 ± 23.2 | 0.82 | 0.418 |
CT (HU) | 80.4 ± 11.2 | 72.8 ± 9.9 | 2.58 | 0.012 |
K4n. | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | -0.44 | 0.658 |
IC (× 100 μg/cm³) | 18.5 ± 2.8 | 18.9 ± 2.8 | -0.45 | 0.652 |
NIC | 0.6 ± 0. | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.80 | 0.007 |
Table 3 Prediction efficacy of spectral computed tomography parameters for vascular nerve invasion status in gastric cancer
Project | AUC (95%CI) | Youden index | Optimal threshold | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Arterial phase | |||||
CT (HU) | 0.755 (0.637-0.873) | 0.498 | 196.0 | 54.76 | 95.00 |
CT (HU) | 0.793 (0.837-0.977) | 0.545 | 84.5 | 59.52 | 95.00 |
K (₄n) | 0.725 (0.602-0.848) | 0.450 | 3.7 | 50.00 | 95.00 |
IC (× 100 μg/cm³) | 0.726 (0.602-0.849) | 0.450 | 19.5 | 50.00 | 95.00 |
NIC | 0.727 (0.593-0.862) | 0.517 | 0.1 | 66.67 | 85.00 |
AP-all | 0.845 (0.747-0.943) | 0.548 | 0.9 | 54.76 | 100.00 |
Venous phase | |||||
CTk (HU) | 0.830 (0.720-0.941) | 0.633 | 217.6 | 83.33 | 80.00 |
CT (HU) | 0.907 (0.837-0.977) | 0.710 | 92.4 | 80.95 | 90.00 |
K | 0.740 (0.606-0.875) | 0.405 | 4.1 | 90.48 | 50.00 |
IC (× 100μg/cm³) | 0.742 (0.607-0.876) | 0.405 | 21.8 | 90.48 | 50.00 |
NIC | 0.745 (0.604-0.886) | 462 | 0.5 | 76.19 | 70.00 |
VP-all | 0.931 (0.872-0.990) | 0.760 | 0.7 | 80.95 | 95.00 |
Delay period | |||||
CT (HU) | 0.560 (0.406-0.713) | 0.179 | 155.9 | 92.86 | 25.00 |
CT (HU) | 0.708 (0.573-0.843) | 0.386 | 74.3 | 78.57 | 60.00 |
K | 0.529 (0.371-0.686) | 0.105 | 3.0 | 90.48 | 20.00 |
IC (× 100 μg/cm³) | 0.532 (0.375-0.690) | 0.081 | 15.9 | 88.10 | 20.00 |
NIC | 0.702 (0.560-0.845) | 0.412 | 0.5 | 76.19 | 65.00 |
DP-all | 0.719 (0.584-0.854) | 0.374 | 0.7 | 52.38 | 85.00 |
- Citation: Wang J, Liang JC, Lin FT, Ma J. Energy spectrum computed tomography multi-parameter imaging in preoperative assessment of vascular and neuroinvasive status in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(8): 2511-2520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i8/2511.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2511