Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2183-2193
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2183
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2183
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t/χ2 | P value | |
Age (years, mean ± SD) | 47.12 ± 13.37 | 46.97 ± 14.21 | 0.246 | 0.806 | |
Sex, n (%) | Male | 25 (50.00) | 27 (54.00) | 0.160 | 0.689 |
Female | 25 (50.00) | 23 (46.00) | |||
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.62 ± 4.03 | 21.36 ± 3.84 | 0.453 | 0.652 | |
History of smoking, n (%) | 7 (14.00) | 6 (12.00) | 0.088 | 0.766 | |
History of alcohol use, n (%) | 10 (20.00) | 12 (24.00) | 0.629 | 0.629 |
Table 2 Comparison of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome and Karnofsky performance status scores before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
Group | Abdominal bloating | Anesthesia | Emaciation | Loose stool | Loss of appetite | Vomit | KPS score | |||||||
1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | 1 d preoperati | 14 d postoperati | |
Control group (n = 50) | 1.98 ± 0.40 | 1.33 ± 0.37a | 1.87 ± 0.32 | 1.46 ± 0.22a | 1.96 ± 0.51 | 1.02 ± 0.46a | 1.81 ± 0.47 | 1.00 ± 0.50a | 1.94 ± 0.34 | 1.52 ± 0.28a | 1.92 ± 0.45 | 1.21 ± 0.40a | 69.78 ± 6.98 | 78.13 ± 7.21a |
Observation group (n = 50) | 1.93 ± 0.42 | 0.74 ± 0.21a | 1.84 ± 0.30 | 1.10 ± 0.17a | 2.00 ± 0.50 | 0.67 ± 0.38a | 1.77 ± 0.45 | 0.61 ± 0.36a | 1.90 ± 0.31 | 1.18 ± 0.20a | 1.94 ± 0.42 | 0.79 ± 0.31a | 68.12 ± 6.77 | 83.32 ± 6.54a |
t value | 0.969 | 9.717 | 0.289 | 0.770 | 0.555 | 4.319 | 0.393 | 4.516 | 0.923 | 7.201 | 0.251 | 5.633 | 1.533 | 4.307 |
P value | 0.335 | < 0.001 | 0.773 | 0.443 | 0.580 | < 0.001 | 0.695 | < 0.001 | 0.358 | < 0.001 | 0.803 | < 0.001 | 0.129 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of immune function before and after treatment between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Index | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t value | P value | |
CD3+ (%) | 1 d preoperatively | 55.31 ± 3.72 | 55.86 ± 3.88 | 1.448 | 0.151 |
14 d postoperatively | 59.03 ± 4.26a | 64.32 ± 4.67a | 6.025 | < 0.001 | |
CD4+ (%) | 1 d preoperatively | 28.26 ± 4.46 | 28.84 ± 4.62 | 0.132 | 0.895 |
14 d postoperatively | 29.16 ± 4.53 | 31.78 ± 3.46a | 3.619 | < 0.001 | |
CD8+ (%) | 1 d preoperatively | 26.89 ± 4.33 | 26.77 ± 4.67 | 0.077 | 0.939 |
14 d postoperatively | 20.67 ± 3.35a | 23.77 ± 3.24a | 4.576 | < 0.001 | |
CD4+/CD8+ (%) | 1 d preoperatively | 1.17 ± 0.26 | 1.11 ± 0.24 | 1.088 | 0.279 |
14 d postoperatively | 1.32 ± 0.18a | 1.63 ± 0.19a | 10.051 | < 0.001 | |
NK cell (%) | 1 d preoperatively | 16.23 ± 1.46 | 16.75 ± 1.49 | 1.558 | 0.122 |
14 d postoperatively | 17.31 ± 1.17 | 20.45 ± 1.01a | 13.240 | < 0.001 | |
IgG (g/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 6.21 ± 1.53 | 6.07 ± 1.47 | 0.405 | 0.686 |
14 d postoperatively | 8.77 ± 1.78a | 11.24 ± 1.58a | 7.882 | < 0.001 | |
IgA (g/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 2.12 ± 0.32 | 2.04 ± 0.36 | 1.110 | 0.270 |
14 d postoperatively | 2.57 ± 0.40a | 2.89 ± 0.38a | 4.144 | < 0.001 | |
IgM (g/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 1.89 ± 0.33 | 1.85 ± 0.29 | 0.578 | 0.565 |
14 d postoperatively | 1.97 ± 0.34a | 2.29 ± 0.38a | 14.364 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of inflammatory mediators before and after treatment between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Index | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t value | P value | |
IL-10 (ng/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 8.73 ± 1.97 | 8.62 ± 2.01 | 1.012 | 0.849 |
14 d postoperatively | 10.21 ± 2.14a | 15.32 ± 2.43a | 11.311 | < 0.001 | |
IL-6 (ng/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 7.41 ± 1.16 | 7.29 ± 1.07 | 0.190 | 0.314 |
14 d postoperatively | 20.78 ± 3.46a | 16.72 ± 3.28a | 5.733 | < 0.001 | |
TNF-α (ng/mL) | 1 d preoperatively | 18.21 ± 4.21 | 18.73 ± 4.56 | 0.701 | 0.485 |
14 d postoperatively | 34.32 ± 5.02a | 22.31 ± 4.94a | 12.060 | < 0.001 | |
CRP (mg/L) | 1 d preoperatively | 6.45 ± 0.37 | 6.53 ± 0.34 | 1.802 | 0.075 |
14 d postoperatively | 31.68 ± 3.72a | 19.27 ± 3.45a | 17.097 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of tumor biological indexes before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
Group | CEA (ng/mL) | CA19-9 (U/mL) | VEGF (ng/mL) | TSGF (U/mL) | ||||
1 d preoperatively | 14 d postoperatively | 1 d preoperatively | 14 d postoperatively | 1 d preoperatively | 14 d postoperatively | 1 d preoperatively | 14 ds postoperatively | |
Control group (n = 50) | 27.11 ± 5.72 | 22.12 ± 4.79a | 46.31 ± 5.78 | 40.32 ± 4.78a | 60.28 ± 10.97 | 40.31 ± 8.12a | 74.31 ± 7.26 | 69.28 ± 6.14a |
Observation group (n = 50) | 26.58 ± 5.87 | 18.33 ± 4.13a | 45.87 ± 5.43 | 36.53 ± 4.01a | 61.09 ± 11.76 | 31.53 ± 9.46a | 73.29 ± 7.53 | 63.28 ± 6.03a |
t value | 0.671 | 4.428 | 0.148 | 4.420 | 0.811 | 4.905 | 0.160 | 4.777 |
P value | 0.504 | < 0.001 | 0.883 | < 0.001 | 0.42 | < 0.001 | 0.873 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of SF-36 scores between the two groups after treatment (mean ± SD)
Index | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
SF-36 score | 81.62 ± 7.33 | 92.26 ± 9.33 | 6.982 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups during treatment, n (%)
Group | Nausea and vomiting | Abdominal bloating | Incision infection | Anastomotic fistula | Gastric retention | Anemia | Total occurrence |
Control group (n = 50) | 4 (8.00) | 5 (10.00) | 3 (6.00) | 2 (4.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 15 (30.00) |
Observation group (n = 50) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (2.00) | 2 (4.00) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | 6 (12.00) |
χ2 | 4.882 | ||||||
P value | 0.027 |
- Citation: Hu Q, Chen XP, Tang ZJ, Zhu XY, Liu C. Therapeutic effects of Buzhong Yiqi decoction in patients with spleen and stomach qi deficiency after routine surgery and chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2183-2193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2183.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2183