Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2135-2144
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2135
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2135
Table 1 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography in T staging
Index | Pathological stage | |||
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
MRI | ||||
Sensitivity | 82.61 (19/23) | 73.91 (17/23) | 78.13 (25/32) | 76.47 (13/17) |
Specificity | 94.44 (68/72) | 87.50 (63/72) | 92.06 (58/63) | 96.15 (75/78) |
Accuracy | 91.58 (87/95)a | 84.21 (80/95) a | 87.37 (83/95)a | 92.63 (88/95)a |
SCT | ||||
Sensitivity | 78.26 (18/23) | 65.22(15/23) a | 62.50 (20/32)a | 52.94 (9/17)a |
Specificity | 91.67 (66/72)a | 86.11 (62/72)a | 82.54 (52/63)a | 92.31 (72/78)a |
Accuracy | 88.42 (84/95)a | 81.05 (77/95)a | 75.79 (72/95)a | 85.26 (81/95)a |
MRI + SCT | ||||
Sensitivity | 95.65 (22/23) | 95.65 (22/23) | 93.75 (30/32) | 94.12 (16/17) |
Specificity | 98.61(71/72) | 95.83 (69/72) | 98.41 (62/63) | 100.00 (78/78) |
Accuracy | 97.89 (93/95) | 95.79 (91/95) | 96.84 (92/95) | 98.95 (94/95) |
Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography in N staging
Index | Pathological stage | ||
N0 | N1 | N2 | |
MRI | |||
Sensitivity | 74.36 (29/39) | 72.73 (16/22) | 73.53 (25/34) |
Specificity | 89.29 (50/56) | 80.82 (59/73) | 91.80 (56/61) |
Accuracy | 83.16 (79/95) | 77.95 (75/95) | 85.26 (81/95) |
SCT | |||
Sensitivity | 61.54 (24/39)a | 68.18 (15/22) | 52.94 (18/34)a |
Specificity | 87.50 (49/56) | 67.12 (49/73)a | 88.52 (54/61) |
Accuracy | 76.84 (73/95) | 67.37 (64/95)a | 75.79 (72/95)a |
MRI + SCT | |||
Sensitivity | 87.18 (34/39) | 81.81 (18/22) | 79.41 (27/34) |
Specificity | 94.64 (53/56) | 86.30 (63/73) | 95.08 (58/61) |
Accuracy | 91.58 (87/95) | 85.26 (81/95) | 89.69 (85/95) |
Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography in M staging
Index | Pathological stage | |
M0 | M1 | |
MRI | ||
Sensitivity | 95.45 (42/44) | 98.04 (50/51) |
Specificity | 98.04 (50/51) | 95.45 (42/44) |
Accuracy | 96.84 (92/95) | 96.84 (92/95) |
SCT | ||
Sensitivity | 93.18 (41/44) | 92.16 (47/51)a |
Specificity | 92.16 (47/51) | 93.18 (41/44) |
Accuracy | 92.63 (88/95) | 92.63 (88/95)a |
MRI + SCT | ||
Sensitivity | 97.73 (43/44) | 100.00 (51/51) |
Specificity | 96.08 (49/51) | 97.73 (43/44) |
Accuracy | 96.84 (92/95) | 98.95 (94/95) |
Table 4 Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography
Index | AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity | Specificity | P value |
BV | 0.750 | 0.612-0.889 | 0.714 | 0.778 | 0.003 |
BF | 0.683 | 0.559-0.806 | 0.857 | 0.593 | 0.030 |
TTP | 0.772 | 0.633-0.910 | 0.643 | 0.802 | 0.001 |
PS | 0.761 | 0.615-0.906 | 0.643 | 0.840 | 0.002 |
Kep | 0.709 | 0.538-0.880 | 0.786 | 0.691 | 0.013 |
Ktrans | 0.719 | 0.536-0.902 | 0.714 | 0.753 | 0.009 |
Ve | 0.910 | 0.825-0.995 | 0.786 | 0.914 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Bai LN, Zhang LX. Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography in the staging and treatment prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2135-2144
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2135.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2135