Zhou CM, Cao J, Chen SK, Tuxun T, Apaer S, Wu J, Zhao JM, Wen H. Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2047-2053 [PMID: 39087105 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2047]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hao Wen, PhD, Professor, State Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No. 137 Liyushan South Road, Xinshi District, Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. dr.wenhao@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2047-2053 Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2047
Table 1 Determination of hepatic hemangioma grade according to the clinical grading system
Points assigned
0
1
2
Symptom
No
Mild
Obvious
Diameter (cm)
< 5
5-10
≥ 10
Location, segment
II, III, VI, VII
IV, V, VIII
I
Tumor increment (cm/year)
0
< 1
≥ 1
Table 2 Clinical characteristics and laboratory data of the patients with hepatic hemangioma
Characteristics
Score < 4
Score ≥ 4
F/χ2
P value
Observation (n = 352)
Surgery (n = 460)
Observation (n = 77)
Surgery (n = 282)
Age (year)
46 (39, 52)
44 (39, 51)
42 (36, 54)
45 (39, 50)
0.55
0.65
HBV positive, n (%)
18 (5.11)
34 (7.39)
6 (7.79)
17 (6.03)
-
0.54
HCV positive, n (%)
3 (0.85)
1 (0.22)
0
1 (0.35)
-
0.61
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)
11.80 (9.25, 15.71)
11.76 (9.17, 15.19)
12.70 (9.42, 16.27)
11.50 (9.41, 11.51)
0.92
0.43
Albumin (g/L)
40.09 (37.63, 43)
40.95 (38, 43.9)
40 (37.65, 46.88)
40.51 (37.7, 43.51)
1.04
0.37
AST (U/L)
18.70 (15.6, 23.95)
18.20 (15.43, 22)
18 (15.3, 22.55)
18.5 (15.78, 21.9)
0.89
0.45
ALT (U/L)
17.7 (13, 25.2)
17.55 (12.85, 24.42)
16.2 (11.65, 23.2)
17.6 (12.7, 24.7)
0.46
0.71
Child-Pugh Grade A, n (%)
349 (99.15)
452 (98.26)
75 (97.40)
278 (98.58)
-
0.51
Coagulopathy (n)
0
0
0
0
-
-
Table 3 Comparison of outcomes during follow-up between the surgical and observation group classified by score ≥ 4 and score < 4, n (%)
Score < 4 (n = 812)
Score ≥ 4 (n = 359)
Observation (n = 352)
Surgery (n = 460)
χ2
P value
Observation (n = 77)
Surgery (n = 282)
χ2
P value
No abdominal complaints
308 (87.5)
430 (93.5)
8.60
0.004
34 (44.2)
274 (97.2)
-
< 0.001
Continuous or intensified or new onset of abdominal complaints
44 (12.5)
30 (6.5)
43 (55.8)
8 (2.8)
Postoperative complications
-
54 (11.7)
-
26 (9.2)
Hepatic
-
12 (2.6)
-
11 (3.9)
Extrahepatic
-
42 (9.1)
-
15 (5.3)
Need for intervention
15 (4.3)
8 (1.7)
-
0.052
31 (40.3)
5 (1.8)
-
< 0.001
Operation
1 (0.3)
1 (0.2)
2 (2.6)
2 (0.7)
TAE
5 (1.4)
2 (0.4)
27 (35.1)
3 (1.1)
RFA
9 (2.6)
5 (1.1)
2 (2.6)
0 (0)
Mortality related to hepatic hemangioma
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
2 (0.7)
-
Total patients with adverse event
48 (13.6)
78 (17.0)
1.68
0.20
45 (58.4)
34 (12.1)
-
< 0.001
Table 4 Postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, n (%)
Score < 4 (n = 460)
Score ≥ 4 (n = 282)
Grade I
30 (6.5)
6 (2.1)
Grade II
1 (0.2)
2 (0.7)
Grade IIIa
21 (4.6)
14 (5.0)
Grade IIIb
1 (0.2)
2 (0.7)
Grade IV
0 (0)
0 (0)
Grade V
0 (0)
2 (0.7)
Table 5 Comparison of outcomes between the observation score < 4 and surgery score ≥ 4, n (%)
No abdominal complaints
Continuous or intensified or new onset of abdominal complaints
Postoperative complications
Need for intervention
Mortality related to hepatic hemangioma
Total patients with adverse event
Score < 4 observation (n = 352)
308 (87.5)
44 (12.5)
-
15 (4.3)
0
48 (13.6)
Score ≥ 4 surgery (n = 282)
274 (97.2)
8 (2.8)
26 (9.2)
5 (1.8)
2 (0.7)
34 (12.1)
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
-
0.060
-
0.634
Citation: Zhou CM, Cao J, Chen SK, Tuxun T, Apaer S, Wu J, Zhao JM, Wen H. Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2047-2053