Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2023-2030
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023
Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups of patients
Characteristic | Joint group, n = 52 | Control group, n = 44 | Statistical value | P value |
Male/female | 33/19 | 29/15 | χ2 = 0.062 | 0.803 |
Age in yr | 62.5 ± 12.0 | 60.1 ± 13.9 | t = 0.908 | 0.366 |
Maximum diameter of lesion in cm | 7.6 ± 3.0 | 8.0 ± 3.4 | t = 0.612 | 0.542 |
Child Pugh grading | χ2 = 0.019 | 0.890 | ||
A | 30 | 26 | ||
B | 22 | 18 | ||
PVTT position | χ2 = 0.055 | 0.973 | ||
Left branch of portal vein | 21 | 17 | ||
Right branch of portal vein | 19 | 16 | ||
Left and right branches of portal vein | 12 | 11 | ||
HBsAg positivity | 35 | 30 | χ2 = 0.008 | 0.927 |
Table 2 Comparison of tumor lesion efficacy between two groups of patients
Group | Cases | Curative effect | Remission rate | Total effective rate | |||
CR | PR | SD | PD | ||||
Joint group | 52 | 3 | 28 | 19 | 2 | 31 (59.62) | 50 (96.15) |
Control group | 44 | 1 | 16 | 23 | 4 | 17 (38.64) | 40 (90.91) |
χ2 value | 4.196 | 1.119 | |||||
P value | 0.041 | 0.290 |
Table 3 Comparison of portal vein tumors efficacy between two groups of patients
Group | Cases | Therapeutic effect | Relief rate | Total effective rate | |||
CR | PR | SD | PD | ||||
Joint group | 52 | 9 | 33 | 9 | 1 | 42 (80.77) | 51 (98.08) |
Control group | 44 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 3 | 26 (59.09) | 41 (93.18) |
χ2 value | 5.421 | 1.430 | |||||
P value | 0.020 | 0.232 |
Table 4 Comparison of portal vein diameter, liver function indicators, alpha-fetoprotein level, and platelet level between the two groups of patients before and after treatment
Time | Cases | AFP in ng/mL | ALT in U/L | AST in U/L | TBIL in μmol/L | PLT as 109/L | Portal vein trunk diameter in mm | WBC as 109/L |
Preoperative | ||||||||
Joint group | 52 | 557.9 ± 196.4 | 57.2 ± 25.8 | 66.8 ± 29.0 | 20.9 ± 5.8 | 162.6 ± 47.2 | 13.90 ± 2.51 | 5.16 ± 1.80 |
Control group | 44 | 570.2 ± 211.6 | 54.0 ± 19.8 | 61.2 ± 25.7 | 22.5 ± 7.5 | 167.0 ± 51.6 | 14.10 ± 2.66 | 5.30 ± 1.95 |
t value | 0.288 | 0.651 | 0.964 | 1.154 | 0.426 | 0.369 | 0.357 | |
P value | 0.774 | 0.515 | 0.338 | 0.251 | 0.671 | 0.713 | 0.722 | |
8 wk after surgery | ||||||||
Joint group | 52 | 138.2 ± 69.5 | 114.2 ± 47.0 | 123.0 ± 51.0 | 35.0 ± 9.4 | 113.0 ± 55.2 | 11.20 ± 2.14 | 3.72 ± 1.15 |
Control group | 44 | 196.4 ± 73.2 | 82.6 ± 29.3 | 89.6 ± 33.7 | 27.1 ± 8.7 | 139.0 ± 50.1 | 12.64 ± 2.00 | 3.90 ± 1.24 |
t value | 3.890 | 3.720 | 3.582 | 4.126 | 2.330 | 3.290 | 0.719 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.001 | 0.473 |
- Citation: Meng P, Ma JP, Huang XF, Zhang KL. Application of radioactive iodine-125 microparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein embolus. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2023-2030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2023.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023