Meng P, Ma JP, Huang XF, Zhang KL. Application of radioactive iodine-125 microparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein embolus. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2023-2030 [PMID: 39087134 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Kang-Le Zhang, Doctor, The Third Department of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Xingfu Road, Zhifu District, Yantai 264001, Shandong Province, China. zhangkangle1987@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2023-2030 Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023
Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups of patients
Characteristic
Joint group, n = 52
Control group, n = 44
Statistical value
P value
Male/female
33/19
29/15
χ2 = 0.062
0.803
Age in yr
62.5 ± 12.0
60.1 ± 13.9
t = 0.908
0.366
Maximum diameter of lesion in cm
7.6 ± 3.0
8.0 ± 3.4
t = 0.612
0.542
Child Pugh grading
χ2 = 0.019
0.890
A
30
26
B
22
18
PVTT position
χ2 = 0.055
0.973
Left branch of portal vein
21
17
Right branch of portal vein
19
16
Left and right branches of portal vein
12
11
HBsAg positivity
35
30
χ2 = 0.008
0.927
Table 2 Comparison of tumor lesion efficacy between two groups of patients
Group
Cases
Curative effect
Remission rate
Total effective rate
CR
PR
SD
PD
Joint group
52
3
28
19
2
31 (59.62)
50 (96.15)
Control group
44
1
16
23
4
17 (38.64)
40 (90.91)
χ2 value
4.196
1.119
P value
0.041
0.290
Table 3 Comparison of portal vein tumors efficacy between two groups of patients
Group
Cases
Therapeutic effect
Relief rate
Total effective rate
CR
PR
SD
PD
Joint group
52
9
33
9
1
42 (80.77)
51 (98.08)
Control group
44
4
22
15
3
26 (59.09)
41 (93.18)
χ2 value
5.421
1.430
P value
0.020
0.232
Table 4 Comparison of portal vein diameter, liver function indicators, alpha-fetoprotein level, and platelet level between the two groups of patients before and after treatment
Time
Cases
AFP in ng/mL
ALT in U/L
AST in U/L
TBIL in μmol/L
PLT as 109/L
Portal vein trunk diameter in mm
WBC as 109/L
Preoperative
Joint group
52
557.9 ± 196.4
57.2 ± 25.8
66.8 ± 29.0
20.9 ± 5.8
162.6 ± 47.2
13.90 ± 2.51
5.16 ± 1.80
Control group
44
570.2 ± 211.6
54.0 ± 19.8
61.2 ± 25.7
22.5 ± 7.5
167.0 ± 51.6
14.10 ± 2.66
5.30 ± 1.95
t value
0.288
0.651
0.964
1.154
0.426
0.369
0.357
P value
0.774
0.515
0.338
0.251
0.671
0.713
0.722
8 wk after surgery
Joint group
52
138.2 ± 69.5
114.2 ± 47.0
123.0 ± 51.0
35.0 ± 9.4
113.0 ± 55.2
11.20 ± 2.14
3.72 ± 1.15
Control group
44
196.4 ± 73.2
82.6 ± 29.3
89.6 ± 33.7
27.1 ± 8.7
139.0 ± 50.1
12.64 ± 2.00
3.90 ± 1.24
t value
3.890
3.720
3.582
4.126
2.330
3.290
0.719
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.022
0.001
0.473
Citation: Meng P, Ma JP, Huang XF, Zhang KL. Application of radioactive iodine-125 microparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein embolus. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2023-2030