Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2024.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1765-1774
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1765
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1765
            Table 1 The study formula (once peptide) at concentration of 1 kcal:1 mL
        
    | Peptide-based formula | Standard formula | |
| Caloric distribution (Protein: Carbohydrate: Fat) | 20:45:35 | 20:52:28 | 
| Source of protein | Whey protein hydrolysate (96%); Leucine (4%) | Sodium caseinate (8%); Soy protein isolate (92%) | 
| Source of carbohydrate | Maltodextrin (79%); Potato starch (21%) | Maltodextrin (64%); Sucrose (32%); Fructo-oligosaccharide (4%) | 
| Source of fat | Fish oil (5%); Canola oil (43%); MCT oil (52%) | Rice bran oil (92%); MCT oil (8%) | 
| Osmolality (mOsm/kg H2O) | 290 | 364 | 
| Osmolarity (mOsm/L) | 242 | 307 | 
            Table 2 Baseline characteristics of study participants, n (%)/mean ± SD
        
    | Peptide-based formula (n = 9) | Standard formula (n = 10) | P value | |
| Demographic | |||
| Age (yr) | 60.1 ± 21.6 | 49.1 ± 26.0 | 0.333 | 
| Gender (Male) | 7 (77.8) | 9 (90.0) | 0.466 | 
| Weight (kg) | 66.2 ± 14.3 | 62.6 ± 10.4 | 0.533 | 
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 3.1 | 22.4 ± 3.8 | 0.275 | 
| GCS score | 10.7 ± 3.0 | 10.0 ± 3.1 | 0.864 | 
| SOFA score | 4.0 ± 2.0 | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 0.769 | 
| 1Nutrition status assessment | |||
| Risk of malnutrition | 4 (44.4) | 3 (30.0) | 0.752 | 
| Mild malnutrition | 4 (44.4) | 5 (50.0) | |
| Moderate malnutrition | 0 (0.0) | 1 (10.0) | |
| Severe malnutrition | 1 (11.1) | 1 (10.0) | |
| Biochemistry | |||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 9.8 ± 2.4 | 10.1 ± 1.8 | 0.793 | 
| White blood cells count (× 103/μL) | 14.8 ± 4.2 | 15.0 ± 7.5 | 0.955 | 
| Platelets count (× 103/μL) | 218.8 ± 112.7 | 175.5 ± 85.5 | 0.253 | 
| Neutrophils | 84.3 ± 8.5 | 83.5 ± 5.8 | 0.826 | 
| Monocytes | 6.3 ± 3.5 | 7.2 ± 3.8 | 0.513 | 
| Total lymphocytes count (cell/μL) | 1267.1± 1164.8 | 1006.0 ± 1005.6 | 0.288 | 
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | 22.3 ± 8.7 | 21.3 ± 20.6 | 0.327 | 
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.9 | 0.102 | 
| Urine urea nitrogen | 12.0 ± 6.4 | 15.4 ± 22.2 | 0.441 | 
| GFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 74.7± 31.6 | 103.5 ± 35.8 | 0.082 | 
| Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 128.0 ± 26.7 | 128.1 ± 49.1 | 0.374 | 
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 92.1 ± 41.2 | 96.3 ± 64.6 | 0.859 | 
| Aspartate transaminase (U/L) | 84.5 ± 52.0 | 104.3 ± 66.5 | 0.501 | 
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 32.5 ± 26.0 | 86.8 ± 99.8 | 0.154 | 
| Nutritional status | |||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 0.821 | 
| Prealbumin (mg/dL) | 10.2 ± 5.3 | 14.1 ± 8.2 | 0.236 | 
| Retinol binding protein (mg/dL) | 2.1 ± 1.7 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 1.000 | 
            Table 3 Subject characteristics
        
    | Subject number | Cause of ICU admission | Type of surgery | 
| 1 | Traumatic subdural hematoma | Non operative management, close neurological observation | 
| 2 | Acute calculus cholecystitis, adult respiratory distress syndrome | Open cholecystectomy | 
| 3 | Closed fracture of shaft of right of humerus, closed fracture of right tibia and fibula severe head injury, maxillofacial injury, traumatic subdural hematoma | Open reduction of fracture with internal fixation humerus. Closed reduction of fracture without internal fixation tibia and fibula. Non operative management, close neurological observation | 
| 4 | AAST grade II liver injury severe head injury, traumatic subdural hematoma thoracic blunt aortic injury | Craniotomy, tracheostomy, thoracic endovascular repair of the aorta | 
| 5 | Splenic injury grade 5 left hemothorax | Exploratory laparotomy with splenectomy | 
| 6 | Large gastric ulcer perforation | Exploratory laparotomy, simple suture with omental patch | 
| 7 | Omental twist causing omental infarction | Exploratory laparotomy, omentectomy with drainage | 
| 8 | Sigmoid colon diverticulitis with perforation | Exploratory laparotomy c sigmoidectomy with Hartmann operation | 
| 9 | Gastric ulcer perforation | Exploratory laparotomy, simple suture with omental patch | 
| 10 | Traumatic subdural hematoma | Craniotomy | 
| 11 | AAST grade 4 pancreatic injury | Exploratory laparotomy, distal pancreatectomy, total splenectomy | 
| 12 | Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland, gallstone | Unilateral adrenalectomy, total cholecystectomy | 
| 13 | Acute calculus cholecystitis | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy | 
| 14 | Closed fracture of acetabulum, fracture of right radius and ulnar bones | Open reduction of fracture with internal fixation of radius and ulnar bones | 
| 15 | Severe head injury, traumatic subdural hematoma | Craniectomy for clot removal | 
| 16 | Epidural hematoma, fracture zygoma, fracture orbit, fracture rib with hemothorax right | Craniotomy with clot removal, open reduction with internal fixation facial fractures | 
| 17 | Distal rectal cancer | Abdominoperineal resection | 
| 18 | Necrotizing fasciitis with septic shock | Debridement right leg | 
| 19 | Necrotizing fasciitis right leg | Debridement right leg | 
            Table 4 Percentage change of serum fibronectin level, median (25th-75th percentiles)
        
    | Peptide-based formula | Standard formula | P value | |
| Day 3 vs Day 1 | 17.8 (39.5) | 17.5 (100.4) | 0.790 | 
| Day 5 vs Day 1 | 21.4 (41.9) | 63.4 (150.4) | 0.290 | 
| Day 11 vs Day 1 | 65.1 (106.8) | 59.1 (211.8) | 0.641 | 
| Day 14 vs Day 1 | 11.0 (115.6) | 80.5 (357.0) | 0.157 | 
            Table 5 Comparison of anthropometry between peptide-based formula and standard formula, mean ± SD
        
    | Peptide-based formula | Standard formula | P value (compare between group for day 14) | |||||
| Day 1 | Day 14 | P value | Day 1 | Day 14 | P value | ||
| Body weight (kg) | 66.2 ± 14.3 | 65.2 ± 13.1 | 0.389 | 62.6 ± 10.4 | 58.4 ± 10.5 | 0.037 | 0.288 | 
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 3.1 | 23.0 ± 2.4 | 0.471 | 22.4 ± 3.8 | 20.9 ± 4.1 | 0.032 | 0.273 | 
| SMI (kg/m2) | 18.4 ± 5.0 | 15.7 ± 3.7 | 0.139 | 16.1 ± 3.2 | 13.6 ± 3.2 | 0.003 | 0.419 | 
            Table 6 Comparison of duration to achieve goal of calories between peptide-based formula and standard formula, mean ± SD
        
    | Day to reach goal | Peptide-based formula | Standard formula | P value | 
| Step 1 (25 kcal/kg/d up) | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 2.5 | 0.462 | 
| Step 2 (30 kcal/kg/d up) | 7.5 ± 3.5 | 8.5 ± 0.7 | 0.733 | 
- Citation: Sumritpradit P, Shantavasinkul PC, Ungpinitpong W, Noorit P, Gajaseni C. Effect of high-protein peptide-based formula compared with isocaloric isonitrogenous polymeric formula in critically ill surgical patient. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1765-1774
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1765.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1765

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        