Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2024.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1592-1600
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1592
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1592
            Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two subgroups
        
    | EUS-BD (n = 33) | PTBD (n = 35) | t/χ2 | P value | |
| Age (mean SD, yr) | 66.13 ± 10.04 | 64.36 ± 9.28 | 0.755 | 0.453 | 
| Sex, n (%) | 0.391 | 0.532 | ||
| Male | 24 (72.73) | 23 (65.71) | ||
| Female | 9 (27.27) | 12 (34.29) | ||
| BMI (mean SD, kg/m2) | 23.10 ± 3.18 | 23.25 ± 3.23 | 0.195 | 0.846 | 
| History of smoking, n (%) | 0.000 | 0.994 | ||
| Yes | 17 (51.52) | 18 (51.43) | ||
| No | 16 (48.48) | 17 (48.57) | ||
| Cancer type, n (%) | 0.066 | 0.967 | ||
| Carcinoma of head of pancreas | 15 (45.46) | 17 (48.57) | ||
| Cholangiocarcinoma | 10 (30.30) | 10 (28.57) | ||
| Other | 8 (24.24) | 8 (22.86) | ||
| Disease course (mean SD, months) | 6.30 ± 3.04 | 6.31 ± 3.17 | 0.015 | 0.988 | 
            Table 2 Comparison of preoperative and postoperative serum indices between the two subgroups, mean ± SD
        
    | Index | Time | EUS-BD (n = 33) | PTBD (n = 35) | t | P value | 
| TP (g/L) | Before surgery | 61.85 ± 7.14 | 59.25 ± 7.12 | -1.498 | 0.139 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 41.75 ± 5.80a,b | 55.13±6.82a | 8.687 | < 0.001 | |
| ALB (g/L) | Before surgery | 44.04 ± 6.98 | 40.97 ± 6.70 | -1.846 | 0.069 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 31.20 ± 4.45a,b | 39.55 ± 6.07a | 6.439 | < 0.001 | |
| ALP (U/L) | Before surgery | 529.68 ± 182.52 | 505.45 ± 176.87 | -0.559 | 0.578 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 285.39 ± 97.22a,b | 360.65 ± 150.02a | 2.439 | 0.017 | |
| ALT (U/L) | Before surgery | 148.76 ± 52.55 | 146.58 ± 53.35 | -0.169 | 0.866 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 51.33 ± 6.61a,b | 73.58 ± 7.03a | 13.424 | < 0.001 | |
| AST (U/L) | Before surgery | 121.29 ± 37.58 | 107.62 ± 28.98 | -1.685 | 0.097 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 42.02 ± 13.95a,b | 75.03 ± 16.25a | 8.969 | < 0.001 | |
| GGT (U/L) | Before surgery | 612.05 ± 179.24 | 575.13 ± 174.30 | -0.861 | 0.391 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 213.67 ± 61.37a,b | 299.65 ± 65.12a | 5.595 | < 0.001 | |
| TBIL (mmol/L) | Before surgery | 228.02 ± 66.39 | 205.23 ± 76.28 | -1.311 | 0.194 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 107.93 ± 52.43a,b | 144.79 ± 59.10a | 2.714 | 0.008 | |
| DBIL (mmol/L) | Before surgery | 204.18 ± 52.86 | 192.13 ± 49.66 | -0.969 | 0.336 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 70.19 ± 17.16a,b | 84.48 ± 19.41a | 3.208 | 0.002 | |
| TBA (mmol/L) | Before surgery | 228.62 ± 55.45 | 208.90 ± 63.35 | -1.362 | 0.178 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 66.31 ± 18.61a,b | 90.55 ± 20.11a | 5.152 | < 0.001 | |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | Before surgery | 13.22 ± 3.29 | 11.60 ± 3.90 | -1.843 | 0.070 | 
| 7 d after surgery | 4.58 ± 1.33a,b | 7.66 ± 2.36a | 6.576 | < 0.001 | 
            Table 3 Comparison of surgical success rates and clinical response rates between the two subgroups, n (%)
        
    | EUS-BD (n = 33) | PTBD (n = 35) | χ2 | P value | |
| Successful operation | 31 (93.94) | 30 (85.71) | 1.244 | 0.265 | 
| Excellent | 16 (48.49) | 14 (40.00) | ||
| Effective | 14 (42.42) | 15 (42.86) | ||
| Ineffective | 3 (9.09) | 6 (17.14) | ||
| Total effective | 30 (90.91) | 29 (82.86) | 0.959 | 0.327 | 
            Table 4 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two subgroups, n (%)
        
    | Complication | EUS-BD (n = 33) | PTBD (n = 35) | χ2 | P value | 
| Biliary fistula | 1 (3.03) | 2 (5.71) | ||
| Cholangitis | 0 (0.00) | 2 (5.71) | ||
| Bile tube bleeding | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.86) | ||
| Pneumoperitoneum | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.86) | ||
| Stent blockage | 1 (3.03) | 3 (8.57) | ||
| Stent displacement | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.86) | ||
| Mucosal laceration | 1 (3.03) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| Total | 3 (9.09) | 10 (28.57) | 4.169 | 0.041 | 
- Citation: Zhu QQ, Chen BF, Yang Y, Zuo XY, Liu WH, Wang TT, Zhang Y. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage vs percutaneous transhepatic bile duct drainage in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1592-1600
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1592.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1592

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        