Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 76-84
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.76
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.76
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data of the two groups of patients
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | χ2/t | P value |
| Gender (n) | 0.022 | 0.883 | ||
| Male | 65 | 35 | ||
| Female | 64 | 36 | ||
| Age (yr) | 48.8 ± 4.5 | 49.5 ± 5.8 | 0.639 | 0.524 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.50 ± 3.12 | 22.01 ± 2.85 | 1.207 | 0.229 |
| Surgical type (n) | 0.088 | 0.993 | ||
| Biliary-intestinal anastomosis | 33 | 34 | ||
| Hepatic lobectomy | 32 | 31 | ||
| Pancreaticoduodenectomy | 19 | 18 | ||
| Pancreaticocaudectomy | 16 | 17 | ||
| Complications (n) | 0.795 | 0.672 | ||
| Diabetes | 4 | 5 | ||
| Hypertension | 18 | 14 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 9 | 11 | ||
| Smoking history (n) | 0.189 | 0.664 | ||
| Yes | 16 | 18 | ||
| No | 29 | 27 | ||
| Drinking history (n) | 0.179 | 0.673 | ||
| Yes | 20 | 22 | ||
| No | 25 | 23 |
Table 2 Comparison of bowel sounds recovery time, gas discharge time, and first feeding time in two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | t | P value |
| Feeding time (h) | 32.15 ± 6.01 | 45.38 ± 5.63 | 16.065 | < 0.001 |
| Defecation time (h) | 41.15 ± 9.46 | 55.38 ± 11.03 | 9.793 | < 0.001 |
| Bowel sound recovery time (h) | 28.86 ± 8.46 | 47.71 ± 10.27 | 14.167 | < 0.001 |
| Anal first exhaust time (h) | 39.14 ± 9.51 | 49.91 ± 8.53 | 8.431 | < 0.001 |
| First out of bed time (d) | 2.16 ± 1.03 | 3.27 ± 1.62 | 5.782 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of overall therapeutic effectiveness between the two groups [n (%)]
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | χ2 | P value |
| Remarkable | 73 (73.00) | 40 (40.00) | ||
| Effective | 25 (25.00) | 28 (28.00) | ||
| Invalidity | 2 (2.00) | 32 (32.00) | ||
| Total effective rate | 98 (98.00) | 68 (68.00) | 31.892 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Postoperative hospitalization status and pain analysis in the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | t | P value |
| Duration of hospitalization (d) | 7.24 ± 0.81 | 12.16 ± 0.93 | 39.893 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative pain score (s) | 2.03 ± 0.15 | 3.85 ± 1.02 | 17.653 | < 0.001 |
| Catheter removal time (d) | 2.16 ± 0.31 | 3.97 ± 0.52 | 29.898 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups [n (%)]
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | χ2 | P value |
| Intestinal obstruction | 2 (2.00) | 6 (6.00) | ||
| Stomatitis | 1 (1.00) | 8 (8.00) | ||
| Belch | 1 (1.00) | 9 (9.00) | ||
| Chapstick | 1 (1.00) | 11 (11.00) | ||
| Overall incidence rate | 5 (5.00) | 34 (34.00) | 26.788 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of nutritional index before and after intervention in the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | t | P value |
| Before intervention | 32.15 ± 3.83 | 31.95 ± 3.28 | 0.397 | > 0.05 |
| After intervention | 48.72 ± 2.51 | 35.63 ± 3.16 | 32.437 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zeng HJ, Liu JJ, Yang YC. Clinical observation of gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after hepatobiliary surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(1): 76-84
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i1/76.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.76
