Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 228-238
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.228
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.228
Ref. | Prognostic association | OSM cutoff | AUC [95%CI] | Sensitivity [95%CI] | Specificity [95%CI] |
Bertani et al[16], 2020 | Prediction of no mucosal healing after anti-TNFα therapy at week 54 by baseline serum OSM | 14 | 0.91 [0.81, 1] | 96% [82, 100] | 89% [67, 97] |
Bertani et al[16], 2020 | Prediction of no mucosal healing after anti-TNFα therapy at week 54 by serum OSM at week 14 | 0.83 [0.7, 0.95] | |||
Bertani et al[17], 2022 | Prediction of no mucosal healing after anti-TNFα therapy at week 54 by baseline serum OSM | 14 | 0.91 [0.84, 0.99] | 91% [78, 97] | 90% [75, 97] |
Bertani et al[17], 2022 | Prediction of non-response to vedolizumab therapy at week 54 by baseline serum OSM | 0.56 [0.42, 0.7] | |||
Cao et al[18], 2021 | Prediction of non-response to infliximab at week 54 by baseline fecal OSM | 0.638 | |||
Cao et al[18], 2021 | Prediction of non-response to infliximab at week 28 by baseline fecal OSM | 132 | 0.763 | 66.7% | 92.5% |
Ezirike Ladipo et al[21], 2021 | Prediction of response to anti-TNF therapy by OSM expression in biopsies | OSM expression in pre-treatment biopsies did not predict response to anti-TNF in a pediatric population | |||
Mateos et al[22], 2021 | Prediction of response to infliximab in a calprotectin log drop measurement model | OSM was found to have predicting ability to infliximab response | |||
Minar et al[23], 2019 | Prediction of no remission after anti-TNFα therapy at week 12 by baseline serum OSM | 144 | 0.71 [0.52, 0.89] | 71% | 78% |
Minar et al[23], 2019 | Prediction of non-response to anti-TNFα therapy at week 12 by baseline serum OSM | 117 | 0.69 [0.5, 0.89] | ||
Mohamed et al[24], 2022 | Prediction of no remission after anti-TNFα therapy by baseline serum OSM | 119 | 0.56 [0.31, 0.82] | 66.7% | 54.2% |
O’connell et al[26], 2022 | Prediction of response to infliximab by colonic OSM expression | No association of pretreatment colonic OSM expression with outcomes of Infliximab therapy | |||
Zhou et al[31], 2019 | Prediction of the response to PF-00547659 (anti-human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1) therapy | Baseline OSM expression/levels were unable to predict response |
Ref. | Prognostic association | OSM cutoff | AUC [95%CI] | Sensitivity [95%CI] | Specificity [95%CI] |
Cao et al[18], 2021 | Identification of mucosal healing after infliximab therapy by fecal OSM | 0.702 | |||
Cao et al[18], 2021 | Identification of clinical remission after infliximab therapy by fecal OSM | 0.674 | |||
Cao et al[19], 2022 | Identification of mucosal healing after infliximab therapy by serum OSM | 64.1 | 0.84 [0.75, 0.91] | 81.8% | 80.8% |
Cao et al[19], 2022 | Identification of clinical response to infliximab therapy by serum OSM | 83 | 0.90 [0.8, 0.96] | 86.4% | 87% |
Cao et al[19], 2022 | Identification of clinical remission after infliximab therapy by serum OSM | 98.9 | 0.9 [0.83, 0.95] | 82.1% | 86.4% |
Guo et al[20], 2022 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after 1 year of anti-TNFα therapy in CD patients by serum OSM | 169 | 0.88 [0.79, 0.96] | 76% [58, 88] | 91% [80, 96] |
Guo et al[20], 2022 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after 1 year of anti-TNFα therapy in UC patients by serum OSM | 234 | 0.94 [0.87, 1] | 80% [55, 93] | 96% [79, 99] |
Nishioka et al[25], 2021 | Distinction between anti-TNFα resistant and sensitive patients by mucosal OSM mRNA | 0.83 | |||
Nishioka et al[25], 2021 | Distinction between ustekinumab resistant and sensitive patients by mucosal OSM mRNA | 0.77 | |||
Verstockt et al[28], 2021 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters 6 months after surgery by serum OSM | 0.80 [0.68, 0.92] | |||
Verstockt et al[28], 2021 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after anti-TNFα therapy by serum OSM | 0.52 [0.44, 0.61] | |||
Verstockt et al[28], 2021 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after anti-TNFα therapy by colonic OSM | 0.74 [0.54, 0.94] | |||
Verstockt et al[28], 2021 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after vedolizumab therapy by serum OSM | 0.51 [0.43, 0.59] | |||
Verstockt et al[28], 2021 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters after vedolizumab therapy by colonic OSM | 0.69 [0.53, 0.84] | |||
West et al[29], 2017 | Distinction between responders and non-responders to infliximab by mucosal OSM mRNA | 0.99 | 100 | 91.7 | |
Yokoyama et al[30], 2023 | Distinction between responders and non-responders to anti-TNFα by mucosal OSM mRNA | 0.94 | |||
Yokoyama et al[30], 2023 | Distinction between CORT-dependent vs non-dependent remission by mucosal OSM mRNA | 0.79 | |||
Zhou et al[31], 2019 | Distinction between responders and non-responders to F-00547659 by change in OSM expression in inflamed tissue | 0.88 | |||
Zhou et al[31], 2019 | Distinction between remitters and non-remitters to F-00547659 by change in OSM expression in inflamed tissue | 0.81 | |||
Zhou et al[31], 2019 | Distinction between mucosal healing and no mucosal healing by F-00547659 therapy by the change in OSM expression during treatment in inflamed tissue | 0.83 |
- Citation: Yang Y, Fu KZ, Pan G. Role of Oncostatin M in the prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(1): 228-238
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i1/228.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.228