Unraveling the efficacy network: A network meta-analysis of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy methods after hepatectomy

Table 1 Commutatively comparative efficacy of different interventions for overall survival

	Log odds ratio (95%CI)
	SBRT	IMRT	3D-CRT	Surgery
SBRT	-	-0.8913 (-4.685, 1.333)	-1.241 (-4.957, 0.9864)	-2.38 (-6.083, -0.2884)
IMRT	0.8913 (-1.333, 4.685)	-	-0.3267 (-1.379, 0.7683)	-1.475 (-2.325, -0.6613)
3D-CRT	1.241 (-0.9864, 4.957)	0.3267 (-0.7683, 1.379)	-	-1.14 (-1.874, -0.5102)
Surgery	2.38 (0.2884, 6.083)	1.475 (0.6613, 2.325)	1.14 (0.5102, 1.874)	-

95%CI: 95% confidence interval; SBRT: Stereotactic body radiotherapy; IMRT: Intensity modulated radiotherapy; 3D-CRT: 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

Table 2 Commutatively comparative efficacy of different interventions for disease-free survival

	Log odds ratio (95%CI)
	SBRT	IMRT	3D-CRT	Surgery
SBRT	-	0.07723 (-1.135, 1.230)	0.5162 (-0.6510, 1.697)	-0.8220 (-1.878, 0.1440)
IMRT	-0.07723 (-1.230, 1.135)	-	0.4326 (-0.3994, 1.323)	-0.9057 (-1.545, -0.3127)
3D-CRT	-0.5162 (-4.697, 0.651)	-0.4326 (-1.323, 0.3994)	-	-1.339 (-1.994, -0.7873)
Surgery	0.8220 (-0.1440, 1.878)	0.9057 (0.3127, 1.545)	1.339 (0.7873, 1.994)	-

95%CI: 95% confidence interval; SBRT: Stereotactic body radiotherapy; IMRT: Intensity modulated radiotherapy; 3D-CRT: 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.