Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2023.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 2012-2020
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.2012
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.2012
            Table 1 Gastric mesenchymal and smooth muscle tumours on plain gastroscopy and endoscopic ultrasound
        
    | Clinical parameters | Intragastric mesenchymal tumour | Smooth muscle tumour | 
| Male | 24 (48.0) | 22 (44.0) | 
| Female | 26 (52.0) | 28 (56.0) | 
| Age, yr | 50.5 ± 14.0a | 57.9 ± 9.5 | 
| Location, % | ||
| Cardia | 0 | 1 (2.0) | 
| Gastric base | 26 (52.0) | 12 (24.0) | 
| Gastric body | 18 (36.0) | 11 (22.0) | 
| Gastric sinus | 9 (18.0) | 2 (4.0) | 
| Diameter, mm | 16.2 ± 9.9a | 9.7 ± 5.0 | 
| Level of origin, % | ||
| Mucosal muscle layer | 2 (3.8) | 1 (2.0) | 
| Inherent muscle layer | 48 (96.0) | 25 (50.0) | 
| Indicated ulcers, % | ||
| Yes | 6 (12.0) | 2 (4.0) | 
| None | 47 (94.0) | 24 (48.0) | 
| Echo characteristics, % | ||
| Low echo | 50 (100) | 47 (94.0) | 
| Waiting for an echo | 0 | 1 (2.0) | 
| High echo | 0 | |
| Echo uniformity, % | ||
| Uniformity | 25 (49.1)a | 50 (100) | 
| Non-homogeneous | 27 (50.0)a | 0 | 
            Table 2 Comparison of tumour marker levels among the three groups (mean ± SD)
        
    | Group | n | CEA (ng/mL) | CA19-9 (ng/mL) | CA-125 (kU/L) | AFP (ng/mL) | CYFRA21-1 (U/mL) | 
| Gastric mesenchymal tumour group | 50 | 1.53 ± 0.24 | 9.32 ± 2.18 | 44.34 ± 10.67 | 5.46 ± 1.18 | 8.17 ± 1.57 | 
| Gastric smooth muscle tumour group | 50 | 0.67 ± 0.15a | 8.37 ± 1.81a | 41.56 ± 8.74 | 5.03 ± 0.86 | 7.44 ± 1.69 | 
| Control group | 50 | 1.04 ± 0.18a,b | 6.45 ± 1.39a,b | 39.67 ± 7.98 | 5.29 ± 0.74 | 7.67 ± 1.88 | 
| F value | 198.507 | 25.753 | 2.608 | 2.100 | 1.888 | |
| P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.078 | 0.127 | 0.156 | 
            Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for the diagnosis of gastric mesenchymal tumour
        
    | Indicators | Area under the curve | Standard error | P value | 95%CI | Optimal cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity | 
| CEA | 0.879 | 0.036 | 0.000 | 0.808-0.950 | 1.145 | 0.850 | 0.675 | 
| CA19-9 | 0.782 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.684-0.880 | 8.880 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 
- Citation: Nie WJ, Jing Z, Hua M. Value of enhanced computed tomography in differentiating small mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal from smooth muscle tumours. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(9): 2012-2020
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i9/2012.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.2012
 
