Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2023; 15(8): 1728-1738
Published online Aug 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1728
Published online Aug 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1728
Table 1 Comparison of general data of two groups, n (%)
General information | Control group (n = 57) | Observation group (n = 63) | χ2/t | P value |
Gender | 0.063 | 0.802 | ||
Male | 41 (71.93) | 44 (69.84) | ||
Female | 16 (28.07) | 19 (30.16) | ||
Age [ (mean ± SD), age] | 57.79 ± 9.28 | 56.70 ± 11.27 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
BMI [ (mean ± SD), kg/m2] | 23.43 ± 3.73 | 23.17 ± 3.06 | 0.433 | 0.666 |
Type of disease | 0.02 | 0.887 | ||
Rectal cancer | 21 (36.84) | 24 (38.10) | ||
Colon cancer | 36 (63.16) | 39 (61.90) | ||
Maximum diameter of metastatic lesion [(mean ± SD), cm] | 3.46 ± 0.94 | 3.39 ± 0.98 | 0.398 | 0.691 |
Number of liver metastatic lesions | ||||
1 | 20 (35.09) | 23 (36.51) | 0.036 | 0.982 |
2 | 19 (33.33) | 21 (33.33) | ||
≥ 3 | 18 (31.58) | 19 (30.16) | ||
Surgical program [n (%)] | 0.3 | 0.956 | ||
Partial hepatectomy | 21 (36.84) | 24 (38.10) | ||
Segmentectomy | 16 (28.07) | 15 (23.81) | ||
Lobectomy | 14 (24.56) | 17 (26.98) | ||
Other | 6 (10.53) | 7 (11.11) |
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative recovery between two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Exhaust time (hour) | Defecation time (hour) | Eating time (day) | Drainage time (day) | Postoperative hospital stay (day) |
Control group | 57 | 42.56 ± 10.23 | 66.36 ± 15.23 | 1.96 ± 0.27 | 8.25 ± 1.63 | 14.12 ± 3.13 |
Observation group | 63 | 31.54 ± 8.67 | 49.93 ± 9.77 | 1.48 ± 0.32 | 6.58 ± 1.44 | 12.03 ± 2.87 |
t | 6.384 | 7.1 | 8.831 | 5.959 | 3.816 | |
P value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 Comparison of T lymphocyte subsets between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | CD3+ (μL) | CD4+ (μL) | CD8+ (μL) | CD4+/CD8+ | ||||
Preoperative | 3 d after operation | Preoperative | 3 d after operation | Preoperative | 3 d after operation | Preoperative | 3 d after operation | ||
Control group | 57 | 1214.36 ± 256.36 | 1108.33 ± 241.25a | 859.63 ± 210.36 | 778.52 ± 189.69a | 658.52 ± 187.25 | 736.33 ± 214.05a | 1.36 ± 0.25 | 1.07 ± 0.36a |
Observation group | 63 | 1197.68 ± 267.33 | 1163.69 ± 287.11 | 867.44 ± 225.59 | 842.52 ± 200.13a | 647.96 ± 193.24 | 665.36 ± 204.78 | 1.34 ± 0.28 | 1.28 ± 0.34a |
t | 0.348 | 1.137 | 0.196 | 1.793 | 0.303 | 1.856 | 0.411 | 3.286 | |
P value | 0.728 | 0.258 | 0.845 | 0.076 | 0.762 | 0.066 | 0.682 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of medical coping style scores between two groups [ (mean ± SD), fraction]
Group | n | Face | Avoid | Yield | |||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 57 | 18.36 ± 3.23 | 21.04 ± 3.34a | 20.36 ± 3.15 | 16.89 ± 2.44a | 14.96 ± 2.77 | 11.25 ± 1.93a |
Observation group | 63 | 17.78 ± 3.26 | 24.15 ± 2.06a | 21.05 ± 3.34 | 14.12 ± 2.05a | 15.12 ± 2.16 | 10.01 ± 1.27a |
t | 0.978 | 6.202 | 1.161 | 6.754 | 0.355 | 4.195 | |
P value | 0.33 | 0 | 0.248 | 0 | 0.724 | 0 |
Table 5 Comparison of the life function index scale scores between two groups [ (mean ± SD), fraction]
Group | n | Good body | Psychologically sound | Difficulty due to cancer | |||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 57 | 40.58 ± 3.96 | 41.35 ± 4.23 | 24.02 ± 3.36 | 25.26 ± 3.07a | 12.23 ± 2.09 | 12.75 ± 2.26 |
Observation group | 63 | 41.07 ± 3.75 | 46.96 ± 3.87a | 23.87 ± 3.41 | 26.89 ± 3.31a | 12.14 ± 2.28 | 12.83 ± 2.07 |
t | 0.696 | 7.587 | 0.242 | 2.788 | 0.225 | 0.202 | |
P value | 0.488 | 0 | 0.809 | 0.006 | 0.823 | 0.84 | |
Group | n | Good society | Nausea | Total score of FLIC | |||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 57 | 10.26 ± 1.38 | 10.87 ± 1.47 | 3.05 ± 1.14 | 3.11 ± 1.05 | 81.89 ± 4.56 | 93.34 ± 5.16a |
Observation group | 63 | 10.19 ± 1.44 | 12.68 ± 1.51a | 2.97 ± 1.21 | 3.23 ± 1.11 | 80.74 ± 4.61 | 102.96 ± 6.44a |
t | 0.271 | 6.64 | 0.372 | 0.607 | 1.372 | 8.869 | |
P value | 0.787 | 0 | 0.711 | 0.545 | 0.173 | 0 |
Table 6 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | Incision infection | Pleural effusion | Intestinal obstruction | Celiac hemorrhage | Cumulative |
Control group | 57 | 3 (5.26) | 3 (5.26) | 1 (1.75) | 1 (1.75) | 8 (14.04) |
Observation group | 63 | 1 (1.59) | 1 (1.59) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (3.17) |
χ2 | 4.621 | |||||
P value | 0.032 |
Table 7 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | discontent | satisfied | Very satisfied | Satisfaction rate |
Control group | 57 | 11 (19.30) | 23 (40.36) | 23 (40.36) | 46 (80.70) |
Observation group | 63 | 4 (6.35) | 29 (46.03) | 30 (47.62) | 59 (93.65) |
χ2 | 6.666 | ||||
P value | 0.01 |
- Citation: Li DX, Ye W, Yang YL, Zhang L, Qian XJ, Jiang PH. Enhanced recovery nursing and mental health education on postoperative recovery and mental health of laparoscopic liver resection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(8): 1728-1738
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i8/1728.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1728