Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2023; 15(7): 1405-1415
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1405
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1405
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data
Factors | Control group (n = 45) | Observation group (n = 58) | χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.287 | 0.591 | ||
≥ 65 | 21 | 24 | ||
< 65 | 24 | 34 | ||
Gender | 1.059 | 0.303 | ||
Male | 25 | 38 | ||
Female | 20 | 20 | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.069 | 0.791 | ||
≥ 23 | 19 | 26 | ||
< 23 | 26 | 32 | ||
ASA classification | 0.142 | 0.931 | ||
Grade I | 15 | 19 | ||
Grade II | 22 | 27 | ||
Grade III | 8 | 12 | ||
Past medical history | ||||
Hypertension | 25 | 22 | 3.173 | 0.074 |
Diabetes mellitus | 15 | 17 | 0.191 | 0.661 |
Clinical stages | 0.341 | 0.558 | ||
Phase I | 22 | 25 | ||
Phase II | 23 | 33 | ||
Tumor diameter | 0.234 | 0.628 | ||
≥ 5 cm | 12 | 18 | ||
< 5 cm | 33 | 40 |
Table 2 Comparison of Leiden-surgical rating scale scores between patients during and after skin incision
Group | Before operation | 60 min | At abdominal closure after operation |
Control group (n = 45) | 4.55 ± 0.93 | 4.46 ± 0.85 | 4.60 ± 0.53 |
Observation group (n = 58) | 4.34 ± 0.47 | 4.32 ± 0.80 | 4.48 ± 0.78 |
t value | 1.878 | 1.244 | 1.422 |
P value | 0.063 | 0.216 | 0.158 |
Table 3 Comparison of visual analogue scale scores between patients before and after operation
Group | 8 h | 24 h | 48 h |
Control group (n = 45) | 2.88 ± 1.01 | 1.48 ± 0.96 | 1.02 ± 0.63 |
Observation group (n = 58) | 2.91 ± 0.94 | 1.08 ± 0.82 | 0.75 ± 0.43 |
t value | 0.133 | 2.280 | 2.538 |
P value | 0.894 | 0.024 | 0.012 |
Table 4 Comparison of driving pressure between patients during operation (p/cmH2O)
Group | 5 min after intubation | 5 min after establishment of pneumoperitoneum | 60 min after establishment of pneumoperitoneum | After recovery of the pneumoperitoneum deflation to horizontal level |
Control group (n = 45) | 10.08 ± 2.33 | 18.21 ± 3.80 | 19.58 ± 4.51 | 12.11 ± 3.71 |
Observation group (n = 58) | 10.50 ± 1.65 | 15.12 ± 3.20 | 16.04 ± 3.09 | 11.59 ± 2.81 |
t value | 1.210 | 5.183 | 5.415 | 0.856 |
P value | 0.229 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.393 |
Table 5 Statistics of adverse post-anesthetic recovery room-associated respiratory events
Group | Upper respiratory tract obstruction | Mild to moderate hypoxia | Severe hypoxia | Respiratory distress | Total incidence rate |
Control group (n = 45) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
Observation group (n = 58) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
χ2 value | 3.655 | ||||
P value | 0.055 |
- Citation: Zhang YW, Li Y, Huang WB, Wang J, Qian XE, Yang Y, Huang CS. Utilization of deep neuromuscular blockade combined with reduced abdominal pressure in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An academic perspective. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(7): 1405-1415
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i7/1405.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1405