Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2023; 15(4): 687-697
Published online Apr 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.687
Published online Apr 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.687
Table 1 Comparison of general data in each group
TACE group (n = 119) | TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | χ2 | P value | |
Gender | 0.512 | 0.604 | ||
Male | 63 | 48 | ||
Female | 56 | 51 | ||
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 56.78 ± 5.68 | 55.89 ± 5.45 | 1.173 | 0.242 |
Child-Pagh liver function rating | 0.463 | 0.765 | ||
Grade A | 36 | 32 | ||
Grade B | 60 | 42 | ||
Grade C | 23 | 25 | ||
Tumor diameter | 0.862 | 0.755 | ||
< 5 cm | 48 | 42 | ||
< 5 cm | 71 | 57 |
Table 2 Comparison of inactivation of lesions in Table 2 groups, n (%)
Group | CR | PR | NC | PD | The effective rate of treatment |
TACE group (n = 119) | 25 (21.01) | 26 (21.84) | 38 (26.89) | 30 (18.49) | 51 (42.86) |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 34 (34.34) | 34 (34.34) | 16 (21.21) | 15 (23.23) | 68 (68.69) |
χ2 | 0.040 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.097 | < 0.001 |
P value | 0.027 | 0.040 | 0.007 | 0.068 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of tumor nodules in groups, n (%)
Group | Tumor nodules | |||
> 50% | < 50% | Stable | Increase | |
TACE group (n = 119) | 39 (32.78) | 28 (23.53) | 29 (24.37) | 23 (19.33) |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 20 (20.20) | 36 (36.36) | 37 (37.37) | 6 (6.06) |
χ2 | 0.054 | 0.041 | 0.053 | 0.008 |
P value | 0.038 | 0.028 | 0.037 | 0.004 |
Table 4 Comparison of lipiodol deposition in groups, n (%)
Group | Lipiodol deposition | |||||
Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV | Grade III + IV | |
TACE group (n = 119) | 18 (29.41) | 23 (29.41) | 20 (21.85) | 30 (25.21) | 28 (23.53) | 58 (48.74) |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 8 (29.41) | 8 (11.11) | 10 (15.15) | 38 (38.38) | 35 (35.35) | 63 (63.64) |
χ2 | 0.165 | 0.030 | 0.152 | 0.037 | 0.045 | < 0.001 |
P value | 0.110 | 0.018 | 0.217 | 0.052 | 0.077 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in different stages (mean ± SD)
Group | AFP (μg/L) | |||
1 mo after the operation | 3 mo after the operation | 6 mo after the operation | 1 year after the operation | |
TACE group (n = 119) | 38.33 ± 4.78 | 38.67 ± 5.32 | 36.45 ± 3.24 | 31.53 ± 3.54 |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 36.45 ± 5.68 | 35.53 ± 4.45 | 32.37 ± 3.47 | 28.78 ± 3.25 |
χ2 | 2.654 | 4.669 | 8.963 | 5.926 |
P value | 0.009 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complications and 1-year survival rate in groups, n (%)
Complications | TACE group (n = 119) | TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | χ2 | P value |
Fever | 6 (5.04) | 6 (6.06) | 0.976 | 0.743 |
Hydrothorax | 16 (13.45) | 15 (5.05) | 0.869 | 0.720 |
Cholecystitis | 4 (3.36) | 6 (6.06) | 0.533 | 0.343 |
Hepatic encephalopathy | 15 (12.61) | 9 (9.09) | 0.543 | 0.409 |
Total complication rate | 41 (34.45) | 36 (36.37) | 0.880 | 0.769 |
1-yr survival rate | 25 (21.00) | 33 (33.33) | 0.058 | 0.040 |
Table 7 Clinical symptom score (mean ± SD)
Group | Hepatic pain | Fatigue | Abdominal distension | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
TACE group (n = 119) | 2.31 ± 0.56 | 2.07 ± 0.63 | 2.67 ± 0.87 | 2.35 ± 0.54 | 2.93 ± 0.62 | 2.37 ± 0.55 |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 2.29 ± 0.58 | 1.56 ± 0.72 | 2.54 ± 0.58 | 1.45 ± 0.63 | 2.79 ± 0.58 | 1.26 ± 0.66 |
χ2 | 0.258 | 5.576 | 0.720 | 11.357 | 1.709 | 13.545 |
P value | 0.796 | < 0.05 | 0.205 | < 0.001 | 0.089 | < 0.001 |
Table 8 Comparison of adverse reactions in groups, n (%)
Group | Nausea | Vomiting | Hair loss | Total incidence |
TACE group (n = 119) | 11 (9.24) | 9 (7.56) | 10 (8.40) | 30 (25.21) |
TACE + TARE group (n = 99) | 5 (5.05) | 5 (5.05) | 4 (4.04) | 14 (14.14) |
χ2 | 0.357 | 0.634 | 0.303 | 0.063 |
P value | 0.237 | 0.451 | 0.191 | 0.043 |
- Citation: Feng R, Cheng DX, Song T, Chen L, Lu KP. Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma descending hepatectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(4): 687-697
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i4/687.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.687