Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2023.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2171-2178
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171
            Table 1 Comparison of general data between two groups
        
    | Group | Gender (male/female) | Age (yr, mean ± SD) | BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | ASA grade (I/II) | Operation time (min, mean ± SD) | Intraoperative bleeding | Sufentanil consumption | 
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 25/20 | 59.56 ± 6.82 | 23.08 ± 0.58 | 23/22 | 148.52 ± 22.63 | 135.81 ± 22.56 | 25.36 ± 4.88 | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 23/17 | 59.08 ± 6.94 | 22.84 ± 0.65 | 21/19 | 150.97 ± 20.51 | 136.44 ± 22.79 | 27.12 ± 4.15 | 
| Statistical value | 0.033 | 0.321 | 1.799 | 0.017 | 0.521 | 0.128 | 1.779 | 
| P value | 0.857 | 0.749 | 0.076 | 0.898 | 0.604 | 0.899 | 0.079 | 
            Table 2 Comparison of visual analog scale scores between two groups (points, mean ± SD)
        
    | Group | 6 h after surgery | 12 h after surgery | 24 h after surgery | 48 h after surgery | 
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 2.53 ± 0.44 | 2.31 ± 0.39 | 2.01 ± 0.31 | 1.32 ± 0.29 | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 2.78 ± 0.39 | 2.69 ± 0.45 | 2.55 ± 0.37 | 1.92 ± 0.36 | 
| t value | 2.757 | 4.171 | 7.319 | 8.501 | 
| P value | 0.007 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 
            Table 3 Comparison of cognitive function between two groups
        
    | Group | Incidence of POCD, n (%) | MMSE score | |
| Before surgery | 24 h after surgery | ||
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 2 (4.44) | 27.94 ± 0.78 | 25.63 ± 1.25 | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 9 (22.50) | 27.82 ± 0.84 | 24.45 ± 2.97 | 
| Statistical value | 6.128 | 0.683 | 2.435 | 
| P value | 0.013 | 0.497 | 0.017 | 
            Table 4 Comparison of intestinal barrier function indicators between two groups (mg/L, mean ± SD)
        
    | Group | DAO | D-LA | ||
| Before surgery | 24 h after surgery | Before surgery | 24 h after surgery | |
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 4.64 ± 0.85 | 3.17 ± 0.72 | 5.28 ± 0.67 | 4.21 ± 0.44 | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 4.52 ± 0.91 | 3.85 ± 0.64 | 5.09 ± 0.78 | 4.63 ± 0.32 | 
| t value | 0.628 | 4.578 | 1.208 | 4.978 | 
| P value | 0.531 | < 0.001 | 0.230 | < 0.001 | 
            Table 5 Comparison of postoperative recovery quality between two groups
        
    | Group | Agitation score | Incidence of agitation during the recovery period, n (%) | 
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 4.21 ± 0.85 | 0 (0.00) | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 5.08 ± 0.66 | 5 (12.50) | 
| Statistical value | 5.222 | 5.977 | 
| P value | < 0.001 | 0.015 | 
            Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complication rates between two groups
        
    | Group | Nausea and vomiting (cases) | Respiratory depression (cases) | Hypotension (cases) | Total incidence rate (%) | 
| TAPB group (n = 45) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.44 | 
| Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) | 5 | 0 | 3 | 20.00 | 
| χ2 value | 4.936 | |||
| P value | 0.026 | 
- Citation: Wang YY, Fu HJ. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2171-2178
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i10/2171.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        