Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2023.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2142-2153
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142
            Table 1 Clinical and pathological features of the patient
        
    | Baseline characteristics | R-NOSES I-F (n = 22) | RLRC (n = 76) | Ρ value | 
| Age (year) | 56.5 ± 8.9 | 59.5 ± 11.1 | 0.107 | 
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.8 ± 2.5 | 22.6 ± 2.0 | 0.136 | 
| Gender | 0.580 | ||
| Male | 8 (36.4) | 45 (59.2) | |
| Female | 14 (63.6) | 31 (40.8) | |
| ASA score | 0.552 | ||
| I, II | 5 (22.7) | 11 (14.5) | |
| III | 17 (77.3) | 65 (85.5) | |
| Previous history of abdominal surgery | 4 (18.2) | 13 (17.1) | 1.000 | 
| Maximum circumferential diameter of specimen (cm) | 0.217 | ||
| < 5 | 19 (86.4) | 56 (73.7) | |
| ≥ 5 | 3 (13.6) | 20 (26.3) | |
| Tumour location from anal verge (cm) | 4.3 ± 1.2 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 0.278 | 
| Abnormal serum CEA (ng/mL) | 0.700 | ||
| ≤ 5 | 16 (72.7) | 52 (68.4) | |
| > 5 | 6 (27.3) | 24 (31.6) | |
| Specimen length (cm) | 11.4 ± 2.2 | 12.8 ± 3.1 | 0.068 | 
| Distal margin (cm) | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 0.737 | 
| Grade of differentiation | 0.976 | ||
| Well | 3 (13.6) | 12 (15.8) | |
| Moderate | 16 (72.7) | 52 (68.4) | |
| Poor | 2 (9.1) | 7 (9.2) | |
| Mucinous | 1 (4.5) | 5 (6.6) | |
| T stage | 0.376 | ||
| T0, Tis, T1 | 6 (27.3) | 12 (15.8) | |
| T2 | 7 (31.8) | 17 (22.4) | |
| T3 | 5 (22.7) | 27 (35.5) | |
| T4 | 4 (18.2) | 20 (26.3) | |
| N Stage | 0.511 | ||
| N0 | 14 (63.6) | 46 (60.5) | |
| N1 | 7 (31.8) | 20 (26.3) | |
| N2 | 1 (4.5) | 10 (13.2) | |
| pTNM | 0.110 | ||
| 0, I | 12 (54.5) | 23 (30.3) | |
| II | 4 (18.2) | 23 (30.3) | |
| III | 6 (27.3) | 30 (39.5) | |
| Number of lymph nodes harvested (n) | 14.2 ± 7.3 | 13.7 ± 6.0 | 0.759 | 
| Nerve violation | 9 (40.9) | 30 (39.5) | 0.904 | 
| Lymphovascular violation | 7 (31.8) | 17 (22.4) | 0.364 | 
            Table 2 Perioperative outcomes
        
    | Outcomes | R-NOSES I-F (n = 22) | RLRC (n = 76) | Ρ value | 
| Surgery time (min) | 173.0 ± 39.5 | 187.3 ± 50.9 | 0.389 | 
| Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 89.6 ± 47.9 | 74.5 ± 62.8 | 0.068 | 
| Prophylactic stoma, n (%) | 7 (31.8) | 36 (47.4) | 0.196 | 
| VAS score | |||
| POD1 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 0.003 | 
| POD3 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.411 | 
| POD5 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.247 | 
| Time to pass flatus (d) | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 | 
| Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 11.1 ± 5.2 | 9.9 ± 5.1 | 0.091 | 
| Hospitalization costs ($) | 85098.7 ± 11067.9 | 82267.9 ± 14993.9 | 0.130 | 
| Postoperative complications, n (%) | 0.632 | ||
| Anastomosis Leakage, n (%) | 2 (9.1) | 2 (2.6) | |
| Pelvic hemorrhage | 0 | 1 (1.3) | |
| Abdominal infection | 0 | 1 (1.3) | |
| Ileus, n (%) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.3) | |
| Incision infection, n (%) | 0 | 2 (2.6) | |
| Incisional hernia of the abdominal wall, n (%) | 0 | 4 (5.3) | |
| Urinary retention | 0 | 1 (1.3) | |
| White blood cell count (× 109/L) | |||
| POD1 | 9.0 ± 2.8 | 9.4 ± 2.9 | 0.462 | 
| POD3 | 7.6 ± 2.2 | 8.5 ± 3.0 | 0.321 | 
| POD5 | 6.8 ± 2.1 | 8.1 ± 4.3 | 0.112 | 
| Neutrophil count (× 109/L) | |||
| POD1 | 7.8 ± 2.6 | 8.1 ± 2.7 | 0.579 | 
| POD3 | 6.0 ± 2.0 | 6.6 ± 3.0 | 0.563 | 
| POD5 | 5.1 ± 2.0 | 5.9 ± 2.7 | 0.266 | 
| Body temperature (℃) | |||
| POD1 | 36.9 ± 0.4 | 37.0 ± 0.4 | 0.600 | 
| POD2 | 37.1 ± 0.6 | 36.9 ± 0.4 | 0.057 | 
| POD3 | 37.0 ± 0.4 | 36.9 ± 0.4 | 0.295 | 
| POD4 | 36.8 ± 0.4 | 36.7 ± 0.4 | 0.300 | 
| POD5 | 36.9 ± 0.7 | 36.7 ± 0.5 | 0.166 | 
            Table 3 Postoperative chemotherapy and follow-up results
        
    | Outcomes | R-NOSES I-F (n = 22) | RLRC (n = 76) | Ρ value | 
| Postoperative chemotherapy | 0.995 | ||
| XELOX | 7 (31.8) | 24 (31.6) | |
| Fluorouracil monotherapy | 3 (13.6) | 11 (14.5) | |
| Defecation and urination function scores | |||
| Wexner | 4.9 ± 2.6 | 5.2 ± 3.1 | 0.817 | 
| LARS | 15.3 ± 9.1 | 12.8 ± 10.1 | 0.177 | 
| IPSS | 3.7 ± 4.6 | 3.5 ± 2.9 | 0.255 | 
| Status at last follow-up | 0.291 | ||
| Local recurrence | 1 (4.5) | 0 | |
| Liver metastasis | 0 | 4 (5.3) | |
| Lung metastasis | 0 | 3 (3.9) | |
| Pelvic metastasis | 0 | 2 (2.6) | |
| Dead | 0 | 2 (2.6) | 
- Citation: Tao F, Liu DN, He PH, Luo X, Xu CY, Li TY, Duan JY. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2142-2153
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i10/2142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        