Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2023; 15(1): 105-113
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.105
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.105
Table 1 Comparison of changes in tumor lengths in the two groups of patients
Group | n | Before treatment | After 1 mo of treatment | After 3 mo of treatment |
Study group | 49 | 6.31 ± 2.00 | 4.11 ± 1.42 | 2.20 ± 1.04 |
Control group | 49 | 6.14 ± 1.89 | 4.78 ± 1.50 | 2.81 ± 0.95 |
t value | 0.432 | -2.271 | -3.031 | |
P value | 0.666 | 0.025 | 0.003 |
Table 2 Comparison of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in the two groups of patients
Group | n | Before treatment | After 1 mo of treatment | After 3 mo of treatment |
Study group | 49 | 549.8 ± 130.7 | 342.0 ± 96.5 | 184.3 ± 67.8 |
Control group | 49 | 530.6 ± 148.0 | 388.5 ± 86.0 | 219.5 ± 73.0 |
t value | 0.681 | -2.518 | -2.473 | |
P value | 0.498 | 0.013 | 0.015 |
Table 3 Comparison of treatment efficacy in the two groups
Group | n | CR | PR | SD | PD | CR + PR |
Study group | 49 | 15 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 46 (93.88) |
Control group | 49 | 9 | 29 | 11 | 0 | 38 (77.55) |
χ2 value | 5.333 | |||||
P value | 0.021 |
Table 4 Comparison of computed tomography perfusion parameters of the lesions in the two groups of patients
Perfusion parameters | Study group, n = 49 | Control group, n = 49 | Z value | P value |
BV, mL/(100 g/min) | ||||
Before treatment | 23.16 ± 3.29 | 22.57 ± 4.02 | 0.795 | 0.429 |
After 3 mo of treatment | 8.40 ± 2.20 | 10.01 ± 2.54 | -3.354 | 0.001 |
PS, mL/(100 g/min) | ||||
Before treatment | 27.17 ± 5.48 | 26.20 ± 5.81 | 0.850 | 0.397 |
After 3 mo of treatment | 12.64 ± 2.60 | 14.20 ± 3.13 | -2.684 | 0.009 |
BF, mL/(100 g/min) | ||||
Before treatment | 254.8 ± 58.1 | 247.6 ± 63.4 | 0.586 | 0.559 |
After 3 mo of treatment | 83.0 ± 24.7 | 100.2 ± 32.5 | -2.949 | 0.004 |
HAF, % | ||||
Before treatment | 0.67 ± 0.17 | 0.64 ± 0.17 | 0.873 | 0.385 |
After 3 mo of treatment | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.10 | -3.826 | 0.000 |
MTT, s | ||||
Before treatment | 7.60 ± 1.63 | 7.80 ± 1.55 | -0.622 | 0.535 |
After 3 mo of treatment | 5.20 ± 0.81 | 5.83 ± 0.96 | -3.511 | 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of survival rates between the two groups
Group | n | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr |
Study group | 49 | 46 (93.88) | 34 (69.39) | 21 (42.86) |
Control group | 49 | 44 (89.8) | 30 (61.22) | 13 (26.53) |
χ2 value | 0.544 | 0.721 | 2.882 | |
P value | 0.461 | 0.396 | 0.090 |
- Citation: Wang L, Huang K, Zhang Y, Wu YF, Yue ZD, Fan ZH, Liu FQ, Li YW, Dong J. Short-term efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radioactive iodine therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(1): 105-113
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i1/105.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.105