Wang L, Huang K, Zhang Y, Wu YF, Yue ZD, Fan ZH, Liu FQ, Li YW, Dong J. Short-term efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radioactive iodine therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(1): 105-113 [PMID: 36741065 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.105]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jian Dong, MD, Doctor, Department of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China. dongjianradiology@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2023; 15(1): 105-113 Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.105
Table 1 Comparison of changes in tumor lengths in the two groups of patients
Group
n
Before treatment
After 1 mo of treatment
After 3 mo of treatment
Study group
49
6.31 ± 2.00
4.11 ± 1.42
2.20 ± 1.04
Control group
49
6.14 ± 1.89
4.78 ± 1.50
2.81 ± 0.95
t value
0.432
-2.271
-3.031
P value
0.666
0.025
0.003
Table 2 Comparison of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in the two groups of patients
Group
n
Before treatment
After 1 mo of treatment
After 3 mo of treatment
Study group
49
549.8 ± 130.7
342.0 ± 96.5
184.3 ± 67.8
Control group
49
530.6 ± 148.0
388.5 ± 86.0
219.5 ± 73.0
t value
0.681
-2.518
-2.473
P value
0.498
0.013
0.015
Table 3 Comparison of treatment efficacy in the two groups
Group
n
CR
PR
SD
PD
CR + PR
Study group
49
15
29
3
0
46 (93.88)
Control group
49
9
29
11
0
38 (77.55)
χ2 value
5.333
P value
0.021
Table 4 Comparison of computed tomography perfusion parameters of the lesions in the two groups of patients
Perfusion parameters
Study group, n = 49
Control group, n = 49
Z value
P value
BV, mL/(100 g/min)
Before treatment
23.16 ± 3.29
22.57 ± 4.02
0.795
0.429
After 3 mo of treatment
8.40 ± 2.20
10.01 ± 2.54
-3.354
0.001
PS, mL/(100 g/min)
Before treatment
27.17 ± 5.48
26.20 ± 5.81
0.850
0.397
After 3 mo of treatment
12.64 ± 2.60
14.20 ± 3.13
-2.684
0.009
BF, mL/(100 g/min)
Before treatment
254.8 ± 58.1
247.6 ± 63.4
0.586
0.559
After 3 mo of treatment
83.0 ± 24.7
100.2 ± 32.5
-2.949
0.004
HAF, %
Before treatment
0.67 ± 0.17
0.64 ± 0.17
0.873
0.385
After 3 mo of treatment
0.24 ± 0.08
0.31 ± 0.10
-3.826
0.000
MTT, s
Before treatment
7.60 ± 1.63
7.80 ± 1.55
-0.622
0.535
After 3 mo of treatment
5.20 ± 0.81
5.83 ± 0.96
-3.511
0.001
Table 5 Comparison of survival rates between the two groups
Group
n
1 yr
2 yr
3 yr
Study group
49
46 (93.88)
34 (69.39)
21 (42.86)
Control group
49
44 (89.8)
30 (61.22)
13 (26.53)
χ2 value
0.544
0.721
2.882
P value
0.461
0.396
0.090
Citation: Wang L, Huang K, Zhang Y, Wu YF, Yue ZD, Fan ZH, Liu FQ, Li YW, Dong J. Short-term efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radioactive iodine therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(1): 105-113