Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2022.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2022; 14(5): 482-493
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.482
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.482
            Table 1 Comparisons of patients’ characteristics between the two groups
        
    | Before PSM | After PSM | |||||
| Omental interposition group (127) | Non-omental interposition group (69) | P value | Omental interposition group (69) | Non-omental interposition group (69) | P value | |
| Male/female | 79/48 | 44/25 | 0.919 | 46/23 | 44/25 | 0.721 | 
| Age (yr) | 64.8 ± 10.5 | 62.1 ± 9.9 | 0.083 | 64.2 ± 9.5 | 62.1 ± 9.9 | 0.210 | 
| BMI (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 21.9 ± 3.0 | 22.0 ± 2.8 | 0.844 | 21.9 ± 3.2 | 22.0 ± 2.9 | 0.933 | 
| ASA score, n (%) | 0.126 | 0.168 | ||||
| I | 65 (51.2) | 42 (60.9) | 34 (49.3) | 42 (60.9) | ||
| II | 60 (47.2) | 24 (34.8) | 34 (49.3) | 24 (34.8) | ||
| III | 2 (1.6) | 3 (4.3) | 1 (1.4) | 3 (4.3) | ||
| Serum ALB [n (%), g/L] | 0.152 | 1.00 | ||||
| < 35 | 13 (10.2) | 12 (17.4) | 12 (17.4) | 12 (17.4) | ||
| ≥ 35 | 114 (89.8) | 57 (82.6) | 57 (82.6) | 57 (82.6) | ||
| Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) | 96.5 (17.9-107.0) | 20.5 (9.6-148.5) | 0.015 | 29.8 (12.4-153.7) | 20.5 (9.6-148.5) | 0.753 | 
| Main pancreatic duct size [n (%), mm] | 0.080 | 0.173 | ||||
| < 3 | 57 (44.9) | 40 (58.0) | 32 (46.4) | 40 (58.0) | ||
| ≥ 3 | 70 (55.1) | 29 (42.0) | 37 (53.6) | 29 (42.0) | ||
| Operation method, n (%) | 0.005 | 0.708 | ||||
| LPD | 69 (54.3) | 19 (27.5) | 21 (30.4) | 19 (27.5) | ||
| OPD | 58 (45.7) | 50 (72.5) | 48 (69.6) | 50 (72.5) | ||
| Pathology, n (%) | 0.009 | 0.151 | ||||
| PDAC | 53 (41.7) | 25 (36.2) | 36 (52.2) | 25 (36.2) | ||
| Bile duct cancer | 10 (7.9) | 13 (18.8) | 4 (5.8) | 13 (18.8) | ||
| Ampulla of Vater cancer | 18 (14.2) | 15 (21.7) | 10 (14.5) | 15 (21.7) | ||
| Duodenal cancer | 11 (8.7) | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.9) | ||
| Other carcinoma | 19 (15.0) | 2 (2.9) | 3 (4.3) | 2 (2.9) | ||
| Benign tumor | 16 (12.6) | 12 (17.4) | 14 (20.3) | 12 (17.4) | ||
            Table 2 Comparisons of the postoperative outcomes between the two groups
        
    | Before PSM | After PSM | |||||
| Omental interposition group (127) | Non-omental interposition group (69) | P value | Omental interposition group (69) | Non-omental interposition group (69) | P value | |
| CR-POPF | 13 (10.2%) | 17 (24.6%) | 0.028 | 7 (10.1%) | 17 (24.6%) | 0.025 | 
| Operation time (mean ± SD, min) | 388.3 ± 68.8 | 365.2 ± 75.0 | 0.031 | 392.6 ± 74.1 | 365.2 ± 75.0 | 0.033 | 
| BF, n (%) | 2 (1.6) | 5 (7.2) | 0.041 | 1 (1.4) | 5 (7.2) | 0.208 | 
| DGE, n (%) | 4 (3.1) | 6 (8.7) | 0.178 | 1 (1.4) | 6 (8.7) | 0.115 | 
| PPH, n (%) | 1 (0.8) | 8 (11.6) | 0.002 | 1 (1.4) | 8 (11.6) | 0.016 | 
| Intra-abdominal abscess, n (%) | 15 (11.8) | 12 (17.4) | 0.286 | 8 (11.6) | 12 (17.4) | 0.333 | 
| Reoperation, n (%) | 3 (2.4) | 6 (8.7) | 0.096 | 2 (2.9) | 6 (8.7) | 0.274 | 
| Mortality in 30 d, n (%) | 2 (1.6) | 5 (7.2) | 0.101 | 2 (2.9) | 5 (7.2) | 0.438 | 
| Mortality related to POPF, n (%) | 1 (0.8) | 5 (7.2) | 0.038 | 1 (1.4) | 5 (7.2) | 0.210 | 
| DFA1 around the HJ site (U/L) | 300.0 (74.3-893.0) | 599.8 (171.1-2064.7) | 0.002 | 200.0 (57.5-659.8) | 599.8 (171.1-2064.7) | 0.003 | 
| DFA1 around the PJ site (U/L) | 546.8 (76.4-3094.0) | 350.0 (50.0-2577.4) | 0.255 | 325.0 (69.5-2972.5) | 350.0 (50.0-2577.4) | 0.951 | 
| Duration until removal of the tube around the HJ site (d) | 7 (5-9) | 9 (7-14) | 0.000 | 8 (6-11) | 9 (7-14) | 0.115 | 
| Duration until removing the tube around the PJ site (d) | 7 (6-11) | 10 (7-15) | 0.004 | 8 (6-12) | 10 (7-15) | 0.100 | 
| Required blood transfusions, n (%) | 18 (14.2) | 20 (29.0) | 0.012 | 9 (13.0) | 20 (29.0) | 0.022 | 
| Length of hospital stay (d) | 15 (11-22) | 21 (13-32) | 0.004 | 16 (12-24) | 21 (13-32) | 0.031 | 
| Duration until restarting diet (d) | 6 (5-8) | 8 (6-15) | 0.001 | 7 (5-8) | 8 (6-15) | 0.048 | 
            Table 3 The univariate and multivariate analyses of the propensity score-matched data to evaluate the risk factors associated with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
        
    | CR-POPF (24) | No CR-POPF (114) | P value | Multivariate analysis | |||
| OR | 95%CI | P value | ||||
| Age (mean ± SD, yr) | 63.5 ± 7.9 | 63.1 ± 10.1 | 0.829 | |||
| Sex, n (%) | 0.040 | |||||
| Male | 20 (83.3%) | 70 (61.4%) | 2.436 | 0.692-8.574 | 0.165 | |
| Female | 4 (16.7%) | 44 (38.6%) | Reference | |||
| Operation method, n (%) | 0.143 | |||||
| LPD | 4 (16.7%) | 36 (31.6%) | ||||
| OPD | 20 (83.3%) | 78 (68.4%) | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.000 | |||||
| ≥ 23 | 18 (75.0%) | 33 (28.9%) | 6.094 | 2.021-18.374 | 0.001 | |
| < 23 | 6 (25.0%) | 81 (71.1%) | Reference | |||
| Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) | 96.6 (16.1-180.4) | 67 (13.8-111.2) | 0.185 | |||
| Serum ALB (g/L) | 0.843 | |||||
| ≥ 35 | 21 (87.5%) | 98 (86.0%) | ||||
| < 35 | 3 (12.5%) | 16 (14.0%) | ||||
| ASA score, n (%) | 0.122 | |||||
| Grade I | 11 (45.8%) | 66 (57.9%) | ||||
| Grade II | 11 (45.8%) | 47 (41.2%) | ||||
| Grade III | 2 (8.3%) | 1 (0.9%) | ||||
| Pathology, n (%) | 0.196 | |||||
| Malignancy | 23 (95.8%) | 96 (84.2%) | ||||
| Benign | 1 (4.2%) | 18 (15.8%) | ||||
| Omental interposition, n (%) | 0.025 | |||||
| Yes | 7 (29.2%) | 62 (54.4%) | Reference | |||
| No | 17 (70.8%) | 52 (45.6%) | 3.145 | 1.040-9.509 | 0.042 | |
| Operating time (mean ± SD, min) | 387.1±82.5 | 377.7±71.2 | 0.609 | |||
| HJ DFA1 (U/L) | 0.010 | |||||
| ≥ 1000 | 13 (54.2%) | 31 (27.2%) | 1.000 | 1.000-1.000 | 0.834 | |
| < 1000 | 11 (45.8%) | 83 (72.8%) | Reference | |||
| PJ DFA1 (U/L) | 0.115 | |||||
| ≥ 1000 | 13 (54.2%) | 42 (36.8%) | ||||
| < 1000 | 11 (45.8%) | 72 (63.2%) | ||||
| Main pancreatic duct size [n (%), mm] | 0.000 | |||||
| ≥ 3 | 3 (12.5%) | 64 (56.1%) | Reference | |||
| < 3 | 21 (87.5%) | 50 (43.9%) | 5.663 | 1.456-22.033 | 0.012 | |
- Citation: Li Y, Liang Y, Deng Y, Cai ZW, Ma MJ, Wang LX, Liu M, Wang HW, Jiang CY. Application of omental interposition to reduce pancreatic fistula and related complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score-matched study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(5): 482-493
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i5/482.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.482
 
