Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2022; 14(10): 1089-1106
Published online Oct 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i10.1089
Published online Oct 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i10.1089
Ref. | Cut-off (U/L) | Predictive | Evaluated (POD) | Patients | Surgery | CR-POPF (%) | Study design | Publication |
Performance | n | |||||||
Giovinazzo et al[48], 2018 | 350 | AUC = 0.92 | 1 | 568 | PD | NS | R | Abstract |
Partelli et al[49], 2017 | 500 | AUC = 0.881, OR = 21.72 | 1 | 463 | PD | 13.82 | R | Abstract |
Kerem et al[50], 2018 | 1363 | AUC = 0.91 | 1 | 135 | PD | 13.33 | R | Abstract |
Kawai et al[51], 2009 | 5000 | P = 0.1002 (univariate) | 1 | 244 | PD | 28 | R | Full paper |
Teixeira et al[52], 2018 | < 270 | Higher median values statistically predicted CR-POPF | 1 | 102 | PD | 25.5 | P | Full paper |
271-5000 | ||||||||
> 5000 | ||||||||
Mimura et al[53], 2012 | 2000 | AUC = 0.81 | 1 | 240 | PD | 23.4 | R | Abstract |
Mimura et al[53], 2012 | 100 | AUC = 0.86 | 5 | 240 | PD | 23.4 | R | Abstract |
Kawaida et al[54], 2018 | 860 | P = 0.002 (univariate) | 3 | 75 | DP | 9.3 | P | Full paper |
Recreo Baquedano et al[55], 2019 | < 400 | NPV = 0.968 | 3 | 278 | PD | 14 | P | Abstract |
Newhook et al[56], 2020 | 49 | Sensitivity = 1 | 1 | 45 | DP | 24 | P | Full paper |
Newhook et al[56], 2020 | 26 | Sensitivity = 1 | 3 | 45 | DP | 24 | P | Full paper |
van Dongen et al[57], 2021 | 100 | Sensitivity = 1 | 2 | 285 | PD | 18.24 | R | Abstract |
Clinical condition | Pancreatoduodenectomy patients | Distal pancreatectomy patients |
Present in CR-POPF patients | Fungi, gram-positive bacteria, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Citrobacter spp, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Enterococcus faecalis Candida spp., Klebsiella, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae | Fungi, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp |
Predictor of CR-POPF | Polymicrobial infections, Candida | |
Predictor of grade C | Gram-negative rods, Candida |
Drain biomarker | To investigate | To confirm |
Amylase | Accuracy of intraoperative predictive cut-offs in pancreatoduodenectomy patients | Diagnostic accuracy of proposed cut-offs |
Accuracy of POD2 cut-offs in distal pancreatectomy patients | The change in postoperative drain amylase required to be predictive of CR-POPF in pancreatoduodenectomy patients | |
Accuracy of POD4 cut-offs in surgery specific cohorts | If a persistently high value for drain amylase x drain volume postoperatively is predictive of CR-POPF | |
Accuracy of risk-stratified cut-offs in distal pancreatectomy patients | ||
The change in postoperative drain amylase required to be predictive of CR-POPF in distal pancreatectomy patients | ||
When drain amylase has the highest predictive accuracy | ||
Lipase | The change in postoperative drain lipase required to be predictive of CR-POPF in surgery specific cohorts and its accuracy | Diagnostic accuracy of proposed cut-offs |
The accuracy of predictive cut-offs before POD3 in surgery specific cohorts | Diagnostic value of drain lipase in multi-factorial predictive models | |
Accuracy of risk-stratified cut-offs in surgery specific cohorts | When drain amylase has the highest predictive accuracy | |
Drain culture | Bacteria within polymicrobial drain fluid samples which predict grade B and C POPF in surgery specific cohorts | Clinical relevance of Enterobacter, Enterococcus and Staphylococcus to CR-POPF risk in pancreatoduodenectomy patients |
When particular microorganisms are most predictive of CR-POPF | ||
The concentrations of high-risk bacteria that accurately predict CR-POPF in surgery specific cohorts | ||
Other biomolecules | Accuracy of predictive cut-offs for each biomarker in surgery specific cohorts | |
Accuracy of novel enzymes compared to drain amylase and lipase in matched surgical cohorts and PODs | ||
Fluid appearance | Accuracy on specific days before POD3 |
- Citation: Rykina-Tameeva N, Samra JS, Sahni S, Mittal A. Drain fluid biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(10): 1089-1106
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i10/1089.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i10.1089