Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2021; 13(4): 340-354
Published online Apr 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i4.340
Published online Apr 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i4.340
Table 1 Patient and fistula characteristics in 1250 patients
Fistulotomy | TROPIS | PERFACT | Anal fistula plug | |
Number of patients (Total = 1250) | 611 | 408 | 175 | 56 |
Total surgical procedures performed including repeat procedures in a few patients (Total = 1351) | 618 | 456 | 216 | 61 |
Follow-up, median (Range) | 40 mo (1-105) | 30 mo (1-70) | 78 mo (13-93) | 151 mo (105-171) |
M/F | 510/101 | 372/36 | 146/29 | 52/4 |
Age | 37.5 ± 10.7 | 40.5 ± 11.1 | 41.7 ± 12.1 | 49.0 ± 10.9 |
Fistula type | Simple | High complex | High complex | Simple + complex |
SJUH classification | I-206, II-143, III-79, IV-179, V-4 | I-1, II-33, III-15, IV-234, V-125 | I-0, II-6, III-43, IV-105, V-21 | Complex-39, Simple-17 |
GARG classification | I-270, II-327, III-10, IV-0, V-4 | I-1, II-42, III-16, IV-224, V-125 | I-0, II-6, III-44, IV-104, V-21 | |
Parks | I-349, II-258, III-4, IV-0 | I-34, II-249, III-125, IV-0 | I-6, II-148, III-21, IV-0 | |
Excluded | 93 (Short FU-30 Lost to FU-63) | 51 (Short FU-38 Lost to FU-13) | 26 (Lost to FU) | 25 (Lost to FU) |
Healing after first surgery | 97.3% (504/518) | 78.2% (279/357) | 35.6% (53/149) | 19.4% (6/31) |
Overall healing rate (Median follow-up) | 98.6% (511/518) | 86% (307/357) | 50.3% (75/149) | 19.4% (6/31) |
Table 2 Results achieved in patients managed by the Garg Fistula Research Institute algorithm and treated by transanal opening of intersphincteric space and fistulotomy
Total (n = 1019) | Subgroup analysis | ||||
Supralevator fistulas (n = 129) | Horseshoe fistula (n = 203) | Associated abscess (n = 258) | No abscess (n = 761) | ||
Excluded | 144 (Lost to FU-76, Short FU-68) | 17 (Lost to FU-3, Short FU-14) | 27 (Lost to FU-8, Short FU-19) | 35 (Lost to FU-18, Short FU-17) | 109 (Lost to FU-58, Short FU-51) |
Healing after first surgery | 89.5% (783/875) | 73.2% (82/112) | 76.7% (135/176) | 85.2% (190/223) | 90.9% (593/652) |
Overall healing rate | 93.5% (818/875) | 82.1% (92/112) | 85.8% (151/176) | 90.6% (202/223) | 94.5% (616/652) |
P = 0.0578 (not significant) |
Table 3 Transanal opening of the intersphincteric space procedure: Preoperative and postoperative incontinence scores at the long-term follow-up
Preoperative (n = 357) | Postoperative (n = 357) | Significance | |
Incontinence (number of patients) | Nil = 334, Gas = 16, Liquid = 6, Solid = 1, Urge = 0 | Nil = 328, Gas = 20, Liquid = 6, Solid = 1, Urge = 2 | P = 0.47, Not significant, (Fisher exact test) |
Vaizey continence scores (mean) | 0.077 ± 0.33 | 0.112 ± 0.44 | P = 0.10, Not significant, (Wilcoxon signed rank test) |
Table 4 Fistulotomy procedure: Preoperative and postoperative Incontinence scores at long-term follow-up
Preoperative (n = 518) | Postoperative (n = 518) | Significance | |
Incontinence (number of patients) | Nil = 512, Gas = 3, Liquid = 2, Solid = 1, Urge = 0 | Nil = 504, Gas = 7, Liquid = 4, Solid = 1, Urge = 2 | P = 0.11, Not significant, (Fisher Exact test) |
Vaizey continence score (mean) | 0.037 ± 0.47 | 0.050 ± 0.34 | P = 0.068, Not significant, (Wilcoxon signed rank test) |
Table 5 Comparison of the short- and long-term success rates of procedures performed
Fistulotomy | TROPIS | PERFACT | Anal fistula plug | |||||
Short-term (2018)[22] | Long-term follow-up | Short-term (2017)[19] | Long-term follow-up | Short-term (2015)[18] | Long-term follow-up | Short-term (2009)[21] | Long-term follow-up | |
n | 353 | 611 | 52 | 408 | 44 | 175 | 23 | 56 |
Follow-up-median (Range) | 27 mo (4-66) | 40 mo (1-105) | 9 mo (6-21) | 30 mo (1-70) | 9 mo (5-14) | 78 mo (42-88) | 10 mo (6-18) | 151 mo (105-171) |
Overall healing rate | 100% | 98.6% | 90.4% | 86% | 86.4% | 50.3% | 71.4% | 19.4% |
Table 6 Anal fistula classification
Classification | Parks | St James University Hospital | GARG |
Grade I | Intersphincteric | Intersphincteric- linear | Low fistula- single tract (intersphincteric or transsphincteric) |
Grade II | Transsphincteric | Intersphincteric-multiple tracts or associated abscess | Low fistula- multiple tracts or associated abscess or horseshoe tract (intersphincteric or transsphincteric) |
Grade III | Suprasphincteric | Transsphincteric- linear | High fistula-single tract (intersphincteric or transsphincteric) or anterior fistula in a female or associated comorbidities1 |
Grade IV | Extrasphincteric | Transsphincteric-multiple tract or associated abscess | High fistula- multiple tracts or associated abscess or horseshoe tract (transsphincteric) |
Grade V | NA | Supralevator or translevator/extrasphincteric | Suprasphincteric or supralevator or extrasphincteric |
- Citation: Garg P, Kaur B, Goyal A, Yagnik VD, Dawka S, Menon GR. Lessons learned from an audit of 1250 anal fistula patients operated at a single center: A retrospective review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(4): 340-354
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i4/340.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i4.340