Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2021; 13(2): 116-126
Published online Feb 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.116
Published online Feb 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.116
Table 1 Characteristics of the mock lesions treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection with a clutch cutter
All, n = 32 | Expert, (ESD-C-E), n = 16 | Non-expert, (ESD-C-NE), | P value | |
Location, n (%) | 0.72 | |||
Middle third | 20 (62.5) | 9 (56.2) | 11 (68.8) | |
Lower third | 12 (37.5) | 7 (43.8) | 5 (31.2) | |
Position, n (%) | 0.61 | |||
Anterior wall | 9 (28.1) | 4 (25.0) | 5 (31.2) | |
Posterior wall | 4 (12.5) | 1 (6.2) | 3 (18.8) | |
Greater curvature | 19 (59.4) | 11 (68.8) | 8 (50.0) | |
Marking size, mm2 | 0.75 | |||
mean ± SD | 391.64 ± 288.63 | 408.54 ± 264.49 | 374.74 ± 318.76 | |
Median (IQR) | 310.86 (184.08-461.78) | 314.00 (219.80-515.16) | 310.86 (175.84-407.42) |
Table 2 Treatment outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection with a clutch cutter
Expert (ESD-C-E), n = 16 | Non-expert, (ESD-C-NE), n = 16 | P value | |
En bloc resection, n (%) | 16 (100) | 16 (100) | - |
Complete procedure, n (%) | 16 (100) | 15 (93.8) | 1 |
Perforation, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
Total procedure time, min | |||
mean ± SD | 13.90 ± 4.49 | 24.31 ± 11.24 | 0.001a |
Median (IQR) | 12.93 (10.79-15.33) | 21.90 (18.50-26.36) | |
Incision time, min | < 0.001a | ||
Median (IQR) | 7.04 (5.57-8.28) | 11.70 (10.75-13.23) | |
Dissection time, min | 0.07 | ||
Median (IQR) | 3.20 (2.18-5.17) | 5.09 (3.50-9.91) | |
Circumferential length, mm | 0.88 | ||
Median (IQR) | 74.85 (68.62-93.11) | 75.46 (66.73-86.59) | |
Resected area, mm2 | 0.78 | ||
Median (IQR) | 437.50 (324.75-688.50) | 451.00 (304.00-589.00) | |
Incision speed, mm/min | 0.001a | ||
Median (IQR) | 11.24 (9.61-12.94) | 6.72 (5.63-9.13) | |
Dissection speed, mm2/min | 0.019a | ||
Median (IQR) | 137.30 (120.17-167.72) | 75.66 (52.57-135.88) |
Table 3 Factors associated with the difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection
No. of patients | No. of events | Univariate | Multivariatea | |||||
OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | |||
Location | 0.52 | 0.49 | ||||||
Middle third | 20 | 9 | 1.64 | 0.37-7.25 | 2.09 | 0.17-12.3 | ||
Lower third | 12 | 4 | 1 | Reference | 1 | Reference | ||
Position | 0.60 | 0.73 | ||||||
Non-GC | 13 | 6 | 1.47 | 0.35-6.17 | 0.68 | 0.08-5.73 | ||
GC | 19 | 7 | 1 | Reference | 1 | Reference | ||
Assistant skill | 0.016a | 0.021a | ||||||
Non-expert | 16 | 10 | 7.22 | 1.44-36.20 | 16.5 | 1.52-178.00 | ||
Expert | 16 | 3 | 1 | Reference | 1 | Reference | ||
Resected area | 0.025a | 0.023a | ||||||
≥ 500 mm2 | 12 | 8 | 6.00 | 1.25-28.8 | 15.3 | 1.46-159.00 | ||
< 500 mm2 | 20 | 5 | 1 | Ref. | 1 |
- Citation: Esaki M, Horii T, Ichijima R, Wada M, Sakisaka S, Abe S, Tomoeda N, Kitagawa Y, Nishioka K, Minoda Y, Tsuruta S, Suzuki S, Akiho H, Ihara E, Ogawa Y, Gotoda T. Assistant skill in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(2): 116-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i2/116.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.116