Zheng Z, Lu JD, Ding YX, Guo YL, Mei WT, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up between “one-step” and “step-up” approaches for infected pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389 [PMID: 34950427 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Fei Li, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Deputy Director, Surgeon, Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China. feili36@ccmu.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389 Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Table 1 The definitions of primary endpoints and secondary endpoints
Endpoints
Definition
Primary endpoints
Composite endpoint consisting of mortality and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa)
There are five grades of Clavien-Dindo Classification: Grade I, any complication that deviates from the natural course after surgery; Grade II, medications other than those permitted for Grade I complications are required; Grade III, surgical, endoscopic, and radiotherapy are required, including Grade IIIa (no general anesthesia is required) and IIIb (need for general anesthesia); Grade IV, life-threatening complication, including Grade IVa (single organ dysfunction) and IVb (multi-organ dysfunction) that require intermittent monitoring or ICU treatment; Grade V, death
Secondary endpoints
New-onset organ failure
New-onset failure of one or more organs in the 24 h prior to the first intervention
Pulmonary failure
Partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) < 60 mmHg with or without partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) > 50 mmHg, or need for mechanical ventilation
Circulatory failure
Blood pressure < 90/60 mmHg, or need for inotropic catecholamine to maintain blood pressure
Renal failure
The level of creatinine (Cr) > 177 μmoL/L, or need for hemofiltration or hemodialysis
Postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding
Need for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention
Pancreatic fistula
Drainage fluid amylase level more than 3 times that of serum amylase
Enterocutaneous fistula
Intestinal contents, including intestinal fluids, food residues, and feces, break through the intestinal wall (small bowel or large bowel) and leak into the abdominal cavity or outside the body. It can also be confirmed by radiology or surgery
Viscera perforation
Need for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention
Endocrine insufficiency
Oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin therapy for at least 6 mo, with no need to take these drugs before the onset of AP
Pancreatic enzyme
Clinical symptoms were improved by oral pancreatic enzyme use for more than 6 mo, with no need to take this drug before the onset of AP
Recurrent pancreatitis
A history of two or more episodes with and interval of at least 3 mo
Chronic pancreatitis
Patients experience abdominal pain, weight loss, diabetes, and fatty diarrhea. The condition is also confirmed by radiological and laboratory examinations. The symptoms did not occur before the onset of AP
Incisional hernia
Six months after discharge, the full-thickness abdominal wall is discontinuous and abdominal contents bulge, with or without obstruction
Pancreatic portal hypertension
AP causes splenic vein thrombosis, which causes obstruction of splenic venous return
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of infectious necrotizing pancreatitis patients who underwent necrosectomy
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Baseline characteristics
Sex
0.61
Female
19
34
Male
42
63
Age (yr)
52.16 ± 11.51
50.57 ± 13.71
0.45
BMI (kg/m2)
26.20 ± 3.78
25.91 ± 3.91
0.73
Cause of AP
0.36
Gallstone
31
48
Alcohol
3
2
Hyperlipidaemia
15
34
Others
12
13
Concomitant disease
0.15
Cardiovascular disease
29
37
Pulmonary disease
8
13
Chronic renal insufficiency
4
21
Diabetes
13
16
Others
7
10
ASA score
0.42
I: Healthy status
30
58
II: Mild systemic status
30
38
III: Severe systemic status
1
1
APACHE-II score
13.9 ± 5.1
14.2 ± 5.4
0.71
CT severity index
6.65 ± 2.55
7.19 ± 2.18
0.18
Severity of AP
0.79
Moderately AP
27
45
Severely AP
34
52
Extent of pancreatic necrosis
0.07
< 30%
35
41
30%-50%
11
33
> 50%
15
23
Preoperative inflammatory indicators
White blood cells (109/L)
11.04 ± 6.31
11.33 ± 6.03
0.77
Neutrophil percentage (%)
80.86 ± 8.3
79.57 ± 8.9
0.36
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
115.3 ± 81.8
118.5 ± 85.7
0.81
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)
1.18 ± 1.0
1.08 ± 2.2
0.73
Interleukin 6 (pg/mL)
113 ± 91.8
116 ± 95.1
0.93
Organ failure
0.49
Single
10
14
Multiple
5
14
None
46
69
Time from onset of disease to admission (days)
32.20 ± 20.75
53.69 ± 38.14
< 0.001
Time from onset of disease to initial surgical treatment (days)
54.38 ± 10.46
76.58 ± 17.03
< 0.001
Tertiary referral (%)
56 (91.8%)
96 (98.9%)
0.06
Table 3 Comparison of perioperative clinical outcomes between the “One-step” approach and the “Step-up” approach
Table 4 The changes of inflammatory indicators and vital signs between two surgical approaches during the perioperative period
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Indicators
Preoperative inflammatory indicators
White blood cells (109/L)
11.04 ± 6.31
11.33 ± 6.03
0.77
Neutrophil percentage (%)
80.86 ± 8.3
79.57 ± 8.9
0.36
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
115.3 ± 81.8
118.5 ± 85.7
0.81
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)
1.18 ± 1.0
1.08 ± 2.2
0.73
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
113 ± 91.8
116 ± 95.1
0.93
Preoperative vital signs
Body temperature (℃)
38.5 ± 0.6
38.0 ± 0.8
0.94
Respiratory frequency (times/min)
25.8 ± 4.8
23.1 ± 4.9
0.67
Heart rate (times/min)
116.1 ± 14.2
107 ± 15.1
0.33
Inflammatory indicators on the 3rd postoperative day
White blood cells (109/L)
9.91 ± 4.5
10.1 ± 4.4
0.54
Neutrophil percentage (%)
78.9 ± 6.8
78.1 ± 7.2
0.97
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
91.6 ± 40.6
91.1 ± 53.3
0.92
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)
0.84 ± 0.6
0.79 ± 0.5
0.71
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
91.2 ± 60.2
94.7 ± 68.4
0.31
Vital signs on the 3rd postoperative day
Body temperature (℃)
38.1 ± 0.4
37.8 ± 0.7
0.49
Respiratory frequency (times/min)
23.8 ± 6.1
22.7 ± 4.3
0.86
Heart rate (times/min)
105.1 ± 21.9
100 ± 24.9
0.68
Inflammatory indicators on the 7th postoperative day
White blood cells (109/L)
7.51 ± 3.0
7.48 ± 2.4
0.96
Neutrophil percentage (%)
69.30 ± 6.1
65.14 ± 7.8
0.43
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
62.63 ± 25.6
68.05 ± 38.1
0.54
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)
0.37 ± 0.3
0.31 ± 0.2
0.94
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
46.3 ± 22.6
49.7 ± 27.4
0.48
Vital signs on the 7th postoperative day
Body temperature (℃)
37.0 ± 0.6
37.3 ± 0.4
0.95
Respiratory frequency (times/min)
19.4 ± 2.3
19.1 ± 2.8
0.83
Heart rate (times/min)
90.1 ± 13.7
85.2 ± 14.1
0.61
Table 5 The long-term complication between the two surgical approaches during the follow-up period
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 40)
“Step-up” approach (n = 63)
P value
Long-term complications
New-onset endocrine insufficiency, n (%)
Number of patients
12 (30)
28 (45)
0.143
Oral medication
9 (75)
20 (71.4)
Insulin
5 (41.7)
13 (46.4)
Exocrine insufficiency, n (%)
Fecal elastase-1, mean value
254.1 ± 107.8
257.9 ± 93.3
0.85
Fecal elastase-1 < 200 μg/g, n (%)
14 (35)
21 (33.3)
0.86
Pancreatic enzyme, n (%)
8 (20)
11 (20.8)
0.93
Recurrent pancreatitis, n (%)
7(17.5)
13(20.6)
0.69
Chronic pancreatitis, n (%)
4 (10)
7 (11.1)
0.86
Incisional hernia, n (%)
9 (20.5)
4 (6.3)
0.03
Clinical symptoms, n (%)
Diarrhea
16 (40)
23 (36.5)
0.72
Bloating
21(52.5)
28(44.4)
0.43
Abdominal pain
10 (25)
13 (20.6)
0.60
Weight loss
31 (77.5)
47 (74.6)
0.74
Pancreatic pseudocyst, n (%)
2 (5)
5 (7.9)
0.56
Pancreatic portal hypertension, n (%)
2 (5)
3 (4.8)
0.96
Pancreatic cancer, n (%)
0
0
-
Table 6 Quality of life rating scale during the follow-up period every 6 mo after treatment of surviving acute pancreatitis patients with the “One-step” approach or “Step-up” approach
Citation: Zheng Z, Lu JD, Ding YX, Guo YL, Mei WT, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up between “one-step” and “step-up” approaches for infected pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389