Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2020; 12(8): 355-368
Published online Aug 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.355
Published online Aug 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.355
Table 1 Comparison of baseline clinical data between Group A and Group C
Group A (n = 40) | Group C (n = 40) | t/χ2 value | P value | |
Gender (Male) | 29 | 31 | 0.267 | 0.606 |
Age (yr) | 62.82 ± 12.93 | 61.38 ± 10.29 | 0.551 | 0.583 |
Tumor size (cm) | 3.75 ± 1.21 | 3.68 ± 1.17 | 0.263 | 0.793 |
Number of tumors | 0.050 | 0.823 | ||
Single | 22 | 21 | ||
2-3 | 18 | 19 | ||
Child-Pugh classification | 0.054 | 0.816 | ||
A | 26 | 25 | ||
B | 14 | 15 | ||
TBiL (μmol/L) | 18.28 ± 5.28 | 17.83 ± 5.16 | 0.583 | 0.562 |
AFP (ng/ml) | 612.29 ± 127.38 | 625.93 ± 139.27 | 0.457 | 0.649 |
ALB (g/L) | 37.19 ± 5.39 | 36.93 ± 5.33 | 0.217 | 0.829 |
ALT (U/L) | 35.27 ± 15.14 | 36.42 ± 17.46 | 0.315 | 0.754 |
AST (U/L) | 38.63 ± 15.13 | 40.41 ± 16.52 | 0.503 | 0.617 |
Table 2 Comparison of the efficacy between Group A and Group C at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th month after treatment, n (%)
3nd month | 6th month | 9th month | ||||
Group A | Group C | Group A | Group C | Group A | Group C | |
CR | 11 (27.5) | 13 (32.5) | 11 (27.5) | 13 (32.5) | 11 (27.5) | 13 (32.5) |
PR | 14 (35.0) | 15 (37.5) | 14 (35.0) | 15 (37.5) | 14 (35.0) | 15 (37.5) |
SD | 13 (32.5) | 11 (27.5) | 12 (30.0) | 10 (25.0) | 10 (25.0) | 10 (25.0) |
PD | 2 (5.0) | 1 (2.5) | 3 (7.5) | 2 (5.0) | 4 (10.0) | 2 (5.0) |
Efficiency | 25 (62.5) | 28 (70.0) | 25 (62.5) | 28 (70.0) | 25 (62.5) | 28 (70.0) |
χ2 value | 0.701 | 0.583 | 0.855 | |||
P value | 0.873 | 0.900 | 0.836 |
Table 3 Comparison of liver function in Group A and Group C at the 1st week after treatment
Group A | Group C | t/χ2 value | P value | |
ALB (g/L) | 32.82 ± 5.93 | 31.32 ± 5.28 | 1.195 | 0.236 |
ALT (U/L) | 48.29 ± 15.39 | 67.29 ± 22.93 | 4.351 | 0.000 |
AST (U/L) | 51.73 ± 14.92 | 79.28 ± 20.28 | 6.921 | 0.000 |
TBiL (μmol/L) | 23.93 ± 8.38 | 31.39 ± 9.29 | 3.771 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Comparison of baseline clinical data between Group A and Group B
Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 36) | t/χ2 value | P value | |
Gender (Male) | 29 | 26 | 0.001 | 0.978 |
Age (yr) | 62.82 ± 12.93 | 64.82 ± 11.82 | 0.722 | 0.472 |
Tumor size (cm) | 3.75 ± 1.21 | 3.13 ± 0.82 | 2.683 | 0.009 |
Number of tumors | 0.002 | 0.961 | ||
Single | 22 | |||
2-3 | 18 | 16 | ||
Child-Pugh classification | 0.023 | 0.878 | ||
A | 26 | 24 | ||
B | 14 | 12 | ||
TBiL (μmol/L) | 18.28 ± 5.28 | 17.38 ± 5.62 | 0.738 | 0.463 |
AFP (ng/ml) | 612.29 ± 127.38 | 567.28 ± 92.39 | 1.746 | 0.085 |
ALB (g/L) | 37.19 ± 5.39 | 34.94 ± 4.53 | 1.958 | 0.054 |
ALT (U/L) | 35.27 ± 15.14 | 36.49 ± 12.31 | 0.383 | 0.703 |
AST (U/L) | 38.63 ± 15.13 | 36.22 ± 13.26 | 0.735 | 0.465 |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Zhang MW, Fan XX, Mao DF, Ding QH, Zhuang LH, Lv SY. Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization sequentially combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of untreated and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12(8): 355-368
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v12/i8/355.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.355