Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2013; 5(12): 332-336
Published online Dec 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.332
A gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the third portion of the duodenum treated by wedge resection: A case report
Fahrettin Acar, Mustafa Sahin, Akın Calisir, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Konya, Konya 42075, Turkey
Serdar Ugras, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Konya, Konya 42075, Turkey
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this case report.
Correspondence to: Fahrettin Acar, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Konya, Campus of Alaaddin Keykubat, Selcuklu, Konya 42075, Turkey. drfacar@hotmail.com
Telephone: +90-332-2415000 Fax: +90-332-2415000
Received: July 30, 2013
Revised: October 19, 2013
Accepted: November 18, 2013
Published online: December 27, 2013
Processing time: 149 Days and 7.6 Hours

Abstract

A 65-year old woman was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed a tumor measuring about 3 cm in diameter with no metastatic lesion or signs of local infiltration. Gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed the presence of a submucosal tumor in the third portion of the duodenum and biopsy revealed tumor cells stained positive for c-kit. These findings were consistent with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and we performed a wedge resection of the duodenum, sparing the pancreas. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on day 6. Surgical margins were negative. Histology revealed a GIST with a diameter of 3.2 cm and < 5 mitoses/50 high power fields, indicating a low risk of malignancy. Therefore, adjuvant therapy with imatinib was not initiated. Wedge resection with primary closure is a surgical procedure that can be used to treat low malignant potential neoplasms of the duodenum and avoid extensive surgery, with significant morbidity and possible mortality, such as pancreatoduodenectomy.

Key Words: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Duodenum; Wedge resection; Surgery

Core tip: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon, with a relatively small subset of GISTs whose optimal surgical procedure has not been well defined. Because submucosal spread and local lymph node involvement is infrequent in GISTs, wide margins with routine lymph node dissection may not be required. Various techniques of limited resection for duodenal GISTs have been described, depending on the site and the size of the tumors. Herein, we present a case of GIST involving the third portion of the duodenum successfully treated by wedge resection with primary closure.



INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal tumors are the most common mesenchymal tumors arising within the gastrointestinal tract[1] and the treatment of choice of these tumors is surgical resection[2,3]. The small intestine is the second most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), of which approximately 20% are found in the duodenum[2]. The optimal surgical procedure for duodenal GIST, however, remains undefined[4] because, while surgical resection clearly confers survival advantage, there is little submucosal spread in GIST and lymphatic involvement is rare. The few reports in the literature addressing the surgical procedures for duodenal GIST include pancreatoduodenectomy, pancreas-sparing duodenectomy, segmental duodenectomy or local resection[4-6]. In this study, we report a case of GIST involving the third portion of the duodenum successfully treated by wedge resection. This surgical technique is ideal when GIST does not involve the ampulla and has not been previously described for the management of this malignancy.

CASE REPORT

A 65-year old woman presenting with abdominal pain was referred to our hospital. Her medical and family history was unremarkable. She had no history of previous abdominal surgery. On physical examination, mild tenderness was complained of in the right upper quadrant area. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a well-demarcated and enhanced tumor in the third portion of the duodenum, measuring approximately 3.0 cm in diameter. The mass appeared to compress the uncinate portion of the pancreas (Figure 1). From these radiographic findings, we diagnosed a submucosal tumor of the duodenum. She underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which revealed a submucosal tumor at the second and third portion of the duodenum. A biopsy obtained was reported as GIST. There was no evidence of metastases to her liver or lung. At laparotomy, a 3.0 cm sized solid mass was identified arising from the pancreatic border of the third portion of the duodenum (Figure 2). No evidence of local invasion of the pancreas or of distant metastases was found and the duodenal wall was carefully dissected from the inferior border of the pancreas. Considering that the pancreas and major papilla were not involved, a partial resection was performed, with a 1 cm disease-free margin (Figures 3 and 4). Operative time was 125 minutes and estimated blood loss was 50 mL. Histological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of spindle cells with a mitotic count < 5 mitoses/50 high power fields (Figure 5A and B). Immunohistochemical study revealed positive staining for CD 117 (c-kit) and S-100 (Figure 5C-E). Based on the above findings, the tumor was finally diagnosed as a GIST with low-grade malignancy originating from the duodenum. A molecular genetic analysis for KIT protein mutation was not performed because of its unavailability at our institute. The patient was doing very well with no evidence of disease recurrence when she was last seen, 4 mo after her operation.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography showed a well-demarcated enhancing tumor 4. 0 cm in diameter in the third portion of the duodenum (white arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2 An endophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the third portion of the duodenum (white arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Local limited wedge resection was subsequently performed with clear margins. Surrounding bowel can be seen to be healthy, allowing for a primary anastomosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Wedge resection with primary closure.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Histology. A: Submucosal tumor tissue is located (hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification, × 5); B: Spindle tumor tissue is composed of cells (hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification, × 10); C: Tumor tissue widely seen moderately strong staining of CD117 (CD117, original magnification, × 20); D: Tumor tissue widely seen SMA staining (SMA, original magnification, × 5); E: Tumor tissue, common, poor, S-100 staining is observed (S-100, original magnification, × 20).
DISCUSSION

GISTs are believed to originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal, which are intestinal pacemaker cells or mesenchymal stem cells[7]. A typical feature of virtually all GISTs is a positivity at immunohistochemistry for the KIT protein (CD117), a transmembrane receptor linked to an intracytoplasmic tyrosine kinase[8]. Duodenal GISTs are mainly located in the second portion of the duodenum[9]. The tumors are frequently located in close relationship to the ampulla of Vater, this determining surgical treatment strategy. In the case presented here, the tumor was located 3 cm distal of the papilla. Most duodenal GISTs present with GI bleeding, usually associated with melena and occasionally with massive acute bleeding[9]. Other symptoms like abdominal pain, early satiety, bloating or obstructive jaundice due to involvement of the papilla of Vater were present in our patient. Diagnosis can be made with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy[10]. The tumor is usually exophytic and appears as a submucosal swelling. Sometimes it presents only as an endophytic tumor, as in our case. The biopsy should be deep but may not always be diagnostic. Endoscopic ultrasound can help in delineating the submucosal tumor. Alternative diagnostic means include CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), barium study or ultrasonography[11]. However, CT and MRI seem to be the best imaging modalities for assessment of the primary lesion and detection of metastases[12], although CT scans are not always helpful in specifying the origin of the mass. In several cases reported in the literature, the mass was misdiagnosed as arising from the head of the pancreas[13].

There is currently uniform agreement that the surgical treatment of choice for GISTs is resection of the tumor with clear surgical margins, including adjacent organs as necessary[12]. As local and regional lymph node involvement is infrequent in GIST, routine lymph node dissection is not advocated[11,14,15] and limited resection is frequently performed. The surgical choice depends not only on the size of the tumor, but also on the location in the duodenal wall and the relationship to the ampulla of Vater[12,16,17]. Patients with duodenal GISTs close to the papilla of Vater should be treated by pancreatoduodenectomy. Various techniques of limited resection for duodenal GISTs have been advocated, depending on the site and the size of the tumors. Wedge resection with primary closure can be performed for small lesions if the resulting lumen is adequate and the ampulla can be preserved[9,18]. Segmental duodenectomy with side-to-end or end-to-end duodenojejunostomy can be performed for larger tumors located at the third and fourth portion of the duodenum[18]. Partial duodenectomy with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy can be performed for larger tumors involving the antimesenteric border of the second and third portion of the duodenum[19]. Although a limited operation procedure, such as wedge or segmental resection, is relatively simple to perform, there is a risk of subsequent anastomotic leakage or stenosis development, as well as later tumor recurrence in patients treated by limited operation. By contrast, pancreatoduodenectomy as a treatment for duodenal GISTs can provide a wider surgical margin but may be associated with excessive morbidity, especially in patients with a tumor of low-grade malignancy[20]. It is not clear what the optimal surgical margin should be, but a negative one is essential to prevent local recurrence of the tumor. No lymph node dissection is required because they are very unlikely to be involved[18,21]. The outcome depends on the pathological features of the tumor and the completeness of surgical resection. Local recurrence is higher in tumors not completely removed or with a positive microscopic margin. In our patient, no suspicious peritumoral lymph nodes were present. Therefore, in order to minimize operative morbidity, we did not perform a formal lymph node dissection.

Fletcher et al[22] established a risk stratification based upon tumor diameter and mitotic activity (Table 1)[22]. The tumor presented in this case belongs to the category determined by size between 2-5 cm and a mitotic count < 5/50 high power fields, which is classified as “low risk”. As we performed a wedge resection of the GIST, this indicates a good prognosis for our patient.

Table 1 Risk of aggressive behavior in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
RiskSize (cm)Mitotic count(mitoses per 50 high powered fields)
Very low risk< 2< 5
Low risk2-5< 5
Intermediate risk< 56-10
5-10< 5
High risk> 5> 5
> 10Any mitotic rate
Any size> 10

Imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is the treatment for locally advanced or metastatic GIST. Imatinib is a signal transduction inhibitor and in particular inhibits the binding of adenosine triphosphate to tyrosine kinase that includes PDGFRA and the c-Kit receptor expressed in GISTs[23]. Recently sunitinib malate, an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of GISTs after progression or intolerance to imatinib mesylate. Sunitinib inhibits platelet-derived growth factor receptors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, which play key roles in tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation[24]. As our patient was classified as “low risk”, we did not initiate an adjuvant treatment with imatinib.

In summary, we report a case of a duodenal GIST located 3 cm distal of the ampulla of Vater successfully treated by a wedge resection. Wedge resection with primary closure is a surgical procedure that can be used to treat low malignant potential neoplasms of the duodenum and avoid extensive surgery, with significant morbidity and possible mortality, such as pancreatoduodenectomy.

COMMENTS
Case characteristics

A 65 year old woman was admitted to hospital with abdominal pain.

Clinical diagnosis

Gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed the presence of a submucosal tumor in the third portion of the duodenum and biopsy revealed tumor cells stained positive for c-kit.

Imaging diagnosis

Abdominal computed tomography showed a well-demarcated and enhanced tumor in the third portion of the duodenum, measuring approximately 3.0 cm in diameter.

Treatment

The patient underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy which revealed a submucosal tumor at the second and third portion of the duodenum.

Related reports

There is currently uniform agreement that the surgical treatment of choice for gastrointestinal stromal tumors is resection of the tumor with clear surgical margins, including adjacent organs as necessary.

Experiences and lessons

Wedge resection with primary closure is a surgical procedure that can be used to treat low malignant potential neoplasms of the duodenum and avoid extensive surgery with significant morbidity and possible mortality such as pancreatoduodenectomy.

Peer review

The manuscript is in general a nice case report but the discussion of the article needs polished.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Giannopoulos GA S- Editor: Zhai HH L- Editor: Roemmele A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1178-1186.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 214]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 230]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Pidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:705-712.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 2000;231:51-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Takahashi H, Kokudo N, Yamaguchi T, Muto T, Makuuchi M. Segmental resection of the third portion of the duodenum for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:364-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, Couture J, O’Sullivan B, Kandel R, Swallow CJ. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:50-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Sturgeon C, Chejfec G, Espat NJ. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a spectrum of disease. Surg Oncol. 2003;12:21-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:1259-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Barusevicius A, Miettinen M. CD117: a sensitive marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors that is more specific than CD34. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:728-734.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Miettinen M, Kopczynski J, Makhlouf HR, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Gyorffy H, Burke A, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas in the duodenum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 167 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:625-641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Poves I, Burdio F, Alonso S, Seoane A, Grande L. Laparoscopic pancreas-sparing subtotal duodenectomy. JOP. 2011;12:62-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Sakata K, Nishimura T, Okada T, Nakamura M. Local resection and jejunal patch duodeno-plasty for the duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor--a case report. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36:2348-2350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Mennigen R, Wolters HH, Schulte B, Pelster FW. Segmental resection of the duodenum for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Kwon SH, Cha HJ, Jung SW, Kim BC, Park JS, Jeong ID, Lee JH, Nah YW, Bang SJ, Shin JW. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum masquerading as a pancreatic head tumor. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3396-3399.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Buchs NC, Bucher P, Gervaz P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P. Segmental duodenectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2788-2792.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Hoeppner J, Kulemann B, Marjanovic G, Bronsert P, Hopt UT. Limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Surgical management and clinical outcome. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;5:16-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Rabin I, Chikman B, Lavy R, Sandbank J, Maklakovsky M, Gold-Deutch R, Halpren Z, Wassermann I, Halevy A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a 19 year experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11:98-102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Everett M, Gutman H. Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of outcome with respect to surgical margins and technique. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:588-593.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Goh BK, Chow PK, Kesavan S, Yap WM, Wong WK. Outcome after surgical treatment of suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors involving the duodenum: is limited resection appropriate. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:388-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Goh BK, Chow PK, Ong HS, Wong WK. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor involving the second and third portion of the duodenum: treatment by partial duodenectomy and Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:273-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Tien YW, Lee CY, Huang CC, Hu RH, Lee PH. Surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:109-114.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Liyanage CA, Abeygunawardhana S, Kumarage S, Deen KI. Duodenum-preserving local excision of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2008;7:214-216.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O’Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2231]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2106]  [Article Influence: 95.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
23.  Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Heinrich MC, Tuveson DA, Singer S, Janicek M. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:472-480.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3203]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3057]  [Article Influence: 139.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, McArthur G, Judson IR, Heinrich MC, Morgan JA. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1329-1338.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1942]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1872]  [Article Influence: 104.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]