Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 105894
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.105894
Laparoscopic micro-incision technique at cystic duct confluence for pediatric choledocholithiasis management: A case report
Guang-Bin Chen, Ding-Bang Wang, Rong-Mei Tang, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second People’s Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu Hospital Affiliated to East China Normal University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China
Guang-Bin Chen, Yan-Guang Sha, Zhi-Lin Wang, Graduate School, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China
Yi-Sheng Chen, Department of General Surgery, Wuhu Guangji Hospital, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China
ORCID number: Guang-Bin Chen (0000-0001-9830-3795); Yan-Guang Sha (0009-0008-0351-6279); Zhi-Lin Wang (0009-0001-0609-9967); Ding-Bang Wang (0009-0004-1032-6458); Rong-Mei Tang (0009-0005-9919-5059); Yi-Sheng Chen (0009-0008-1840-2207).
Co-first authors: Guang-Bin Chen and Yan-Guang Sha.
Co-corresponding authors: Rong-Mei Tang and Yi-Sheng Chen.
Author contributions: Chen GB and Sha YG contributed equally to this work as co-first authors; Tang RM and Chen YS designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript, they contributed equally as co-corresponding authors; Chen GB, Sha YG, and Wang DB performed the surgical procedure and wrote the paper; Wang ZL and Wang DB managed the patient; Chen GB, Sha YG, Chen YS, and Wang ZL contributed to the discussion and design of the manuscript and edited the pictures; all authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yi-Sheng Chen, MD, Chief Physician, Professor, Department of General Surgery, Wuhu Guangji Hospital, No. 19 Zheshan Middle Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China. chenyisheng1953@163.com
Received: February 10, 2025
Revised: March 15, 2025
Accepted: April 3, 2025
Published online: May 27, 2025
Processing time: 102 Days and 20 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The management of pediatric choledocholithiasis is complicated by anatomical constraints and the subsequent risks of conventional therapies requiring external drainage. This case report introduces a novel laparoscopic microincision technique at the cystic duct confluence, designed to eliminate T-tube dependence, minimize ductal trauma, and expedite recovery, which are critical priorities for active children. We present this innovation to address unmet pediatric-specific surgical needs and demonstrate its feasibility as a tailored, minimally invasive solution for choledocholithiasis in children.

CASE SUMMARY

A 12-year-old girl with a 5-year history of recurrent upper abdominal pain was diagnosed with choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis, and biliary pancreatitis based on imaging and laboratory tests. After failed conservative management, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a microincision at the cystic duct confluence enabled choledochoscopic extraction of seven stones without T-tube placement. Primary closure using absorbable sutures with cystic duct confluence preserved biliary integrity. Postoperatively, liver function and amylase levels normalized by day 3, and abdominal ultrasonography confirmed no complications. The patient promptly resumed normal activity with no recurrence observed at the 16-month follow-up visit. This approach avoids external drainage, minimizes ductal manipulation, and optimizes recovery, which are key advantages for pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Microincision at the cystic duct confluence safely eliminates T-tubes, ensures stone clearance, and accelerates pediatric recovery.

Key Words: Pediatric choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Micro-incision technique; Cystic duct confluence; Ductal integrity preservation; Minimally invasive pediatric surgery; Case report

Core Tip: We present a novel microincision technique at the cystic duct confluence during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for pediatric choledocholithiasis. By avoiding T-tube placement, critical for active children requiring unrestricted movement and timely return to school, this approach minimizes ductal trauma, preserves biliary integrity, and accelerates recovery. A 12-year-old patient achieved rapid normalization of liver function and symptom resolution with no recurrence at the 16-month follow-up visit. This innovation addresses pediatric-specific anatomical and lifestyle challenges, offering a safer, minimally invasive alternative to conventional methods. This technique underscores the need for surgical strategies tailored to the unique needs of children.



INTRODUCTION

Pediatric choledocholithiasis, characterized by stones within the common bile duct (CBD), is a rare condition (prevalence: 0.15%-0.22%) with distinct challenges in children[1]. Anatomical constraints such as narrow ductal lumens, fragile bile duct walls, and developmental vulnerability require minimally invasive strategies that balance efficacy with the preservation of biliary integrity[2,3]. Furthermore, pediatric patients require a rapid postoperative recovery to resume school and physical activity, emphasizing the need for interventions that avoid external devices and prolong hospitalization. Current treatments for pediatric choledocholithiasis, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE), and laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE)[4-6], are extrapolated from adult protocols but carry certain limitations in children[7]. These shortcomings highlight the unmet need for pediatric-specific techniques that eliminate external drainage, minimize ductal trauma, and align with developmental requirements. Herein, we present a novel laparoscopic microincision technique at the cystic duct confluence during LCBDE designed to address these challenges. By using the natural dilation of the cystic duct junction, this approach enables direct choledochoscopic stone extraction without a CBD incision or T-tube placement. We report its successful application in a 12-year-old patient with choledocholithiasis and demonstrate its feasibility and potential to advance pediatric biliary surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 12-year-old girl presented with recurrent upper abdominal pain that had persisted for > 5 years.

History of present illness

The patient experienced recurrence of upper abdominal pain and discomfort 2 weeks prior to admission, with symptoms worsening 3 days before presentation. On August 12, 2023, she was admitted to the Guangji Hospital. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed choledochal stones, dilated intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder stones, and cholecystitis. Subsequent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography confirmed the presence of a gallbladder stone and multiple CBD stones (Figure 1). The patient received symptomatic treatment including anti-infective therapy and rehydration, which resulted in symptom improvement.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of the abdomen. A: A stone (white arrow) in the gallbladder; B: Multiple stones (white arrow) in the common bile duct.
History of past illness

Five years prior, the patient had experienced recurrent pain and discomfort in the right upper abdomen without obvious triggers. The symptoms resolved with rest and no specific treatment was required.

Personal and family history

The patient had no history of abdominal surgery or any other surgical contraindications. No history of residence in epidemic areas or contact with infected water sources or epidemic sources were noted.

Physical examination

Upon admission, vital signs showed a temperature of 36.5 °C, pulse of 70 beats/minutes, respiratory rate of 18 breaths/minutes blood pressure of 11.5/8.5 kPa, and body weight of 35 kg. Physical examination showed mild icteric discoloration of the skin and sclera. Palpation of the upper abdomen revealed deep tenderness without rebound tenderness or muscle guarding. No significant pain was detected in the hepatorenal region.

Laboratory examinations

Initial laboratory tests revealed significantly elevated liver function and serum amylase levels (Figure 2, Table 1). White blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein levels were within normal ranges (Table 1).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparative liver function tests and serum amylase levels in the patient before surgery and on postoperative day 3. ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT: γ-glutamyl transferase; TBiL: Total bilirubin; DBil: Direct bilirubin; AMY: Amylase; Preop: Preoperative; Postop: Postoperative.
Table 1 Initial laboratory assessments at hospital admission.
Parameter
Result
Reference range
White blood cells6.29 × 109/L4.0-11.0 × 109/L
Neutrophil percentage62.80%40%-70%
Red blood cells4.30 × 1012/L3.5-5.0 × 1012/L
Hemoglobin121 g/L110-150 g/L
Alanine aminotransferase167 U/L7-56 U/L
Aspartate aminotransferase158 U/L10-40 U/L
Gamma-glutamyl transferase573 U/L9-48 U/L
Alkaline phosphatase520 U/L44-147 U/L
Total bilirubin54.3 μmol/L5.1-17.1 μmol/L
Direct bilirubin29.4 μmol/L0-6.8 μmol/L
Indirect bilirubin24.9 μmol/L3.4-13.7 μmol/L
Amylase1126 U/L30-110 U/L
C-reactive protein1.98 mg/L0-8 mg/L
Imaging examinations

Plain and enhanced upper abdominal computed tomography performed on August 17, 2023, demonstrated an enlarged gallbladder, a dilated CBD with a maximum diameter of approximately 1.3 cm, and a slightly dilated main pancreatic duct (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Preoperative computed tomography scan of the upper abdomen. A: Plain phase revealed an enlarged gallbladder and dilated common bile duct, with the common bile duct measuring approximately 1.3 cm in maximum diameter (white arrow); B: Arterial phase revealed a slightly dilated main pancreatic duct (black arrow); C: Venous phase.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Based on the medical history, laboratory examination results, and imaging findings of the patient, the final diagnoses were CBD stones with cholangitis, gallbladder stones with cholecystitis, and biliary pancreatitis.

TREATMENT

Following surgical and clinical research protocols and after obtaining informed consent, the modified laparoscopic surgical technique was performed on August 22, 2023. Under general anesthesia, a standard laparoscopic approach was initiated with four ports. The procedure involved dissection of the gallbladder adhesions and exposure of Calot’s triangle, followed by standard anatomical dissection with isolation of the cystic duct approximately 2 cm from the junction. The cystic arteries were ligated and divided. After complete exposure of the common hepatic duct, cystic duct, and CBD, the distal cystic duct was pre-ligated using a 4-0 silk suture. An incision was made in the cystic duct and its confluence with the CBD, which was approximately 1.5 cm (Figure 4A). Choledochoscopy revealed seven stones of varying sizes in the middle and lower CBD (Figure 4B and C), which were extracted using a basket. The biliary system was comprehensively examined, including visualization of the ampulla of Vater (Figure 4D) and the second- to third-order intrahepatic bile ducts (Figure 4E). The cystic duct confluence and proximal cystic duct were closed using 4-0 absorbable sutures and clamped with Hem-o-lok, and the cystic duct approximately 0.2 cm from the CBD. The procedure included cholecystectomy, electrocautery hemostasis of the gallbladder bed, placement of an abdominal negative-pressure drainage tube below the liver, and closure of all incisions.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Laparoscopic micro-incision technique applied at the cystic duct confluence during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration procedure. A: Pre-ligating and applying traction to the distal cystic duct with a 4-0 silk suture, the Calot’s triangle was exposed, and a microincision was made at the cystic duct-common bile duct (CBD) confluence (white arrow); B: Choledochoscope insertion through the micro-incision at cystic duct confluence; C: During choledochoscopy, stones were identified in the middle and lower segments of the CBD, which were subsequently extracted using a basket retrieval technique; D: Upon reinsertion of the choledochoscope, no stones were observed in the distal and middle segments of the CBD; E: Upon repositioning the choledochoscope, no stones were identified in the proximal segment of the CBD.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The postoperative recovery of the patient was uneventful. Liver function test results and serum amylase levels significantly improved on postoperative day 3 (Figure 2). Abdominal ultrasonography performed 1 week after surgery showed no significant free fluid. The drainage tube was removed (Figure 5), and the patient was discharged. No imaging abnormalities were detected during follow-up ultrasound examinations at 7 and 16 months postoperatively. The child had normal dietary habits, sleep patterns, and overall health status.

Figure 5
Figure 5  The drainage tube was removed prior to the patient's discharge, leaving only a small drain site (white arrow).
DISCUSSION

Choledocholithiasis, although well-established in adult surgical practice, presents unique complexities in pediatric populations owing to anatomical and developmental constraints. The rarity of this condition in children underscores the need for surgical innovation that addresses pediatric-specific challenges, including narrower ductal lumens, thinner bile duct walls, and the imperative for rapid recovery to accommodate school and physical activity. Our novel laparoscopic microincision technique at the cystic duct confluence during LCBDE offers a tailored solution, as evidenced by the successful management of a 12-year-old patient with choledocholithiasis.

Anatomical and technical rationale

Pediatric biliary anatomy requires meticulous precision[8]. The cystic duct confluence, often anatomically dilated compared with the adjacent CBD, serves as an optimal access point for choledochoscopy while minimizing direct trauma to the CBD. In this case, a 1.5 cm micro-incision at this junction allowed complete extraction of seven stones and thorough visualization of the biliary tree, including the ampulla of Vater and intrahepatic ducts. By avoiding direct CBD incision and suturing, this approach mitigates the risks of postoperative strictures, which are critical in growing children, and preserves the native ductal architecture.

Critical evaluation of current therapies

Current therapeutic modalities for pediatric choledocholithiasis (ERCP), LCBDE with T-tube placement, LCBDE with primary CBD closure, and LTCBDE are adaptations of adult protocols, each with distinct limitations in children.

ERCP: Although minimally invasive and effective for stone extraction[5,9], ERCP in pediatric patients carries a 4% risk of pancreatitis[9] and technical challenges due to smaller anatomical dimensions[10,11]. Radiation exposure, duodenal papilla manipulation, and the need for specialized endoscopic expertise further limit its utility[9,11], particularly in younger children.

LCBDE: Conventional LCBDE often require T-tube drainage to prevent postoperative bile leakage. However, external drainage prolongs hospitalization, restricts mobility, and increases the difficulty of T-tube-related care[12]. For active children, T-tube management disrupts school attendance and physical activity, significantly affecting their quality of life.

LCBDE with primary CBD closure: Although T-tube avoidance is a theoretical advantage, primary CBD closure in children remains technically demanding. Pediatric bile duct walls are fragile, potentially leading to bile leakage even with meticulous suturing. Furthermore, direct CBD incision and suturing may interfere with longitudinal ductal growth, raising concerns regarding long-term stenosis or developmental anomalies.

LTCBDE: Transcystic exploration minimizes ductal trauma but is limited by anatomical constraints such as a narrow cystic duct diameter (< 3 mm) or unfavorable insertion angles[13,14]. Large stone burdens (> 8 mm) or impacted stones frequently require conversion to LCBDE or a complementary surgical intervention[15-17]. Our microincision technique bridges these gaps by combining direct choledochoscopic access via the cystic duct confluence with primary closure using absorbable sutures, thereby eliminating external drainage, avoiding CBD manipulation, and accelerating return to daily activities.

Innovations and advantages of the micro-incision technique

This approach introduces several pivotal refinements: (1) T-Tube avoidance: By circumventing external drainage, postoperative care is simplified, enabling unrestricted mobility and rapid reintegration into school life; (2) Anatomically targeted Access: Leveraging the natural dilation of the cystic duct confluence optimizes stone retrieval while minimizing iatrogenic injury to the CBD; (3) Comprehensive visualization: Direct choledochoscopic examination of the entire biliary system, including the second- and third-order intrahepatic ducts, ensures complete stone clearance, which is a critical factor for preventing recurrence; and (4) Developmental preservation: Avoiding CBD incision mitigates long-term risks of stenosis or growth-related complications, a paramount consideration in pediatric surgery.

Clinical outcomes and limitations

The rapid biochemical normalization of the patient (liver enzymes and amylase by postoperative day 3) and the absence of complications (e.g., bile leakage and infection) underscore the safety of the technique. Sixteen months of follow-up imaging confirmed the absence of recurrence and further validated its efficacy. However, success of this approach depends on advanced laparoscopic and choledochoscopic proficiency, particularly in microincision creation, intracorporeal suturing, and choledochoscopic stone extraction. Additionally, while this single-case outcome is promising, multicenter studies with larger cohorts are warranted to evaluate the long-term ductal patency and recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

The cystic duct confluence microincision technique is a promising alternative for the management of pediatric choledocholithiasis. By harmonizing anatomical precision, minimally invasive principles, and quality-of-life priorities, this study addresses the unique challenges of pediatric biliary surgery while offering a scalable model for future innovation.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Babar A; Hou YF; Pogorelic Z S-Editor: Wei YF L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Al-Salem AH  Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis. In: An Illustrated Guide to Pediatric Surgery. Cham: Springer, 2014: 277-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
2.  Kasai Y, Aoki R, Nagano N, Kaneda H, Koshinaga T, Morioka I. Usefulness of Thin-Slice Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Detecting Perforation Site in Congenital Biliary Dilatation: A Case Report. J Nippon Med Sch. 2023;89:623-628.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Herrera-LeBlanc ID, Domínguez-Hernández MF, Palacios-Saucedo GC, Herrera-Rivera CG. Common bile duct diameter by age groups in adult patients without bile duct pathology. Cir Cir. 2022;90:503-507.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Bosley ME, Zamora IJ, Neff LP. Choledocholithiasis-a new clinical pathway. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:35.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Keil R, Drábek J, Lochmannová J, Šťovíček J, Koptová P, Wasserbauer M, Frýbová B, Šnajdauf J, Matouš J, Kotalová R, Rygl M, Hlava Š. ERCP in infants, children, and adolescents-Different roles of the methods in different age groups. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210805.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Pogorelić Z, Lovrić M, Jukić M, Perko Z. The Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Single-Step Treatment of Pediatric Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis. Children (Basel). 2022;9:1583.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sha Y, Wang Z, Tang R, Wang K, Xu C, Chen G. Modern Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Breakthroughs, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Cureus. 2024;16:e75246.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Simmons CL, Harper LK, Patel MC, Katabathina VS, Southard RN, Goncalves L, Tran E, Biyyam DR. Biliary Disorders, Anomalies, and Malignancies in Children. Radiographics. 2024;44:e230109.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Hosseini A, Sohouli MH, Sharifi E, Sayyari A, Sridharan K, Tajalli S, Imanzadeh N, Fatahi S. Indications, success, and adverse event rates of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2023;23:596.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Yıldırım AE, Altun R, Ocal S, Kormaz M, Ozcay F, Selcuk H. The safety and efficacy of ERCP in the pediatric population with standard scopes: Does size really matter? Springerplus. 2016;5:128.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Makita S, Amano H, Kawashima H, Hinoki A, Shirota C, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Yokota K, Okamoto M, Takimoto A, Yasui A, Nakagawa Y, Uchida H. Utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in management of pediatric pancreaticobiliary disease. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:134.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Li L, Zeng Z, Li L, Zhang J. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration-- a 5-year retrospective analysis. BMC Surg. 2024;24:199.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Zhu JG, Han W, Guo W, Su W, Bai ZG, Zhang ZT. Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1691-1697.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Sureka B, Bansal K, Patidar Y, Arora A. Magnetic resonance cholangiographic evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct variations. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2016;26:22-32.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
15.  Yoo D. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and transductal T-tube insertion with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and laparoscopic ultrasound: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11:7193-7199.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Lei J, Wang J, Li Q, Wu P, Yuan R, Zhu H, Zou S, Shao J, Fang L. Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration: T-Shaped Incision of Cystic Duct with FREDDY Laser Lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26:646-651.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Yang XB, Xu AS, Li JG, Xu YP, Xu DS, Fu CC, Deng DB, Li J, Zhang MZ. Dilation of the cystic duct confluence in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction in patients with secondary choledocholithiasis. BMC Surg. 2020;20:50.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]