Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2024; 16(11): 3391-3394
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3391
Pembrolizumab in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases: A paradigm shift in immunotherapy
Grigorios Christodoulidis, Department of General Surgery, The University Hospital of Larissa, The University of Thessaly, Larissa 41110, Greece
Dimitra Bartzi, Department of Oncology, The 251 Airforce General Hospital, Athens 11525, Greece
Konstantinos Eleftherios Koumarelas, Department of Emergency Medicine, The General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece
Marina Nektaria Kouliou, Department of General Surgery, The University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
ORCID number: Grigorios Christodoulidis (0000-0003-3413-0666); Konstantinos Eleftherios Koumarelas (0000-0002-5614-4770); Marina Nektaria Kouliou (0000-0002-2055-2297).
Author contributions: Christodoulidis G, Bartzi D, Koumarelas KE, and Kouliou MN contributed to the discussion, design of the manuscript, the writing and editing of the manuscript, and review of the literature; Christodoulidis G designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Grigorios Christodoulidis, MD, PhD, Academic Editor, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, The University of Thessaly, Biopolis Campus, Larissa 41110, Greece. gregsurg09@gmail.com
Received: April 27, 2024
Revised: July 18, 2024
Accepted: July 24, 2024
Published online: November 27, 2024
Processing time: 185 Days and 23.8 Hours

Abstract

In this editorial, we explore the impact of immunotherapy and its safety in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and liver involvement. GC, a formidable adversary in the oncology landscape, presents its most challenging battlefront when it reaches stage IV, often characterized by liver metastases. The prognosis for patients at this advanced stage is daunting, with systemic chemotherapy traditionally offering a median overall survival slightly over a year. However, the landscape of treatment is evolving, with new strategies and therapies offering a glimmer of hope.

Key Words: Gastric cancer; Immunotherapy; Pembrolizumab; Liver metastasis; Prognosis; Treatment

Core Tip: Given the multifaceted challenges of treating gastric cancer with liver metastases, adopting a personalized approach to therapy is crucial. This involves integrating biomarker testing, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, into treatment decisions to identify likely responders to immunotherapy such as pembrolizumab. By tailoring treatment strategies based on individual patient characteristics and disease biology, clinicians can optimize therapeutic efficacy and mitigate potential adverse events, ultimately improving outcomes for patients navigating this complex clinical scenario.



INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health challenge. GC is the fourth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide[1,2]. Approximately 2.0% to 9.9% of GC patients develop synchronous liver metastases, while up to 37% develop liver metastases metachronously following radical gastrectomy. Interestingly, almost 80% of metachronous liver metastases appear within the first 2 years after hepatic surgical treatment[3,4]. With over one million new cases in 2020 and an estimated 769000 deaths, it ranks fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality globally[1]. GC is the fourth most common cancer worldwide, accounting for approximately 5.7% of all cancer cases. The incidence of GC varies by geographic location, with higher rates observed in Eastern Asia (e.g., Japan, Korea and China) and lower rates in Western countries. Liver metastases occur in a subset of GC patients, either synchronously (at the time of initial diagnosis) or metachronously (after primary treatment)[5]. GC presents a multifaceted landscape of risk factors, with chronic Helicobacter pylori infection as a prominent contributor alongside dietary habits such as high consumption of salted, smoked, or pickled foods, as well as tobacco and alcohol use. Genetic predisposition, particularly a family history of GC, and the presence of chronic atrophic gastritis further compound the susceptibility to this malignancy. Liver metastases, a significant complication, are often associated with advanced tumor stage, lymph node involvement, and aggressive tumor biology. Clinical presentation manifests with nonspecific symptoms including abdominal pain, weight loss, early satiety, and anemia, while liver metastases may introduce additional indicators like jaundice, hepatomegaly, and ascites. Prognosis for GC with liver metastases remains bleak, typically characterized by a median survival measured in months. Treatment modalities encompass systemic chemotherapy for symptom control and survival extension, surgical resection of liver metastases in select cases, and local therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy. Targeted therapies aimed at specific molecular pathways and immunotherapy are also emerging as potential options. Research endeavors are actively exploring novel therapeutic targets, refining patient selection criteria, advancing early detection strategies, and delving into personalized medicine approaches, all with the goal of improving outcomes in the management of GC and liver metastases[5]. In this editorial, we comment on the retrospective review by Liu et al[2] “Analysis of the impact of immunotherapy efficacy and safety in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastasis”.

IMMUNOTHERAPY AND GC

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy by augmenting the immune system's ability to combat tumor cells, targeting proteins like programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to enhance immune recognition and attack cancerous cells. However, the response to ICIs exhibits heterogeneity across metastatic sites, with liver metastasis presenting distinct challenges. Understanding progression patterns and survival outcomes in response to ICIs is critical for refining patient care[6,7]. In retrospective studies involving GC patients treated with ICIs, two progression patterns emerged: Non-systemic progression, characterized by localized disease progression and improved overall survival (OS), particularly in the absence of liver metastasis[2], and systemic progression, associated with widespread metastasis and shorter survival times, notably influenced by liver metastasis[6]. Intratumoral immune cell density, particularly CD8+ T-cells, was found to be lower in patients with liver metastasis after ICIs, while other immune cells showed no significant differences. Clinical implications include personalized approaches through biomarker testing to identify likely responders based on PD-L1 expression and other markers, tailored therapy selection, and patient education to ensure informed decisions and realistic expectations[6]. Additionally, considerations for maintaining quality of life alongside survival benefits are paramount, emphasizing the importance of balancing treatment efficacy with potential toxicities. Despite challenges, immunotherapy has promise for GC patients with liver metastasis, and through comprehensive understanding of progression patterns, refined treatment strategies, and holistic patient support, improved outcomes can be achieved[6-10].

NAVIGATING PEMBROLIZUMAB EFFICACY AND SURVIVAL

The KEYNOTE series of trials, notably KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062, have been pivotal in assessing the efficacy of pembrolizumab in GC, particularly in patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10[11]. In third-line or later settings, KEYNOTE-059 demonstrated pembrolizumab's OS of 8 months and an objective response rate (ORR) of 17%, while KEYNOTE-061 in the second-line setting exhibited a median OS of 10 months with an ORR of 25%[11]. Notably, KEYNOTE-062 in the first-line setting reported a median OS of 17 months for pembrolizumab vs 11 months for chemotherapy, underlining its clinically meaningful survival benefit[1]. The United States Food and Drug Administration approval for pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer was based on significant improvements in OS, progression-free survival, and ORR. The pivotal trial, KEYNOTE-859, showed improved OS (12.9 months vs 11.5 months) and ORR (51% vs 42%) with pembrolizumab vs placebo, with subgroup analysis revealing enhanced outcomes in patients with higher PD-L1 expression[12-15]. Real-world evidence supports pembrolizumab's feasibility in pre-treated patients, although its efficacy varies based on individual factors such as CPS score, necessitating a personalized approach, especially in the complex landscape of stage IV GC with liver metastasis[14,15]. Pembrolizumab's favorable benefit-to-risk profile is counterbalanced by immune-related adverse events, including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and pulmonary complications, mandating a multidisciplinary approach for management[16]. Pembrolizumab treatment can trigger various adverse reactions, with dermatologic issues such as rash and pruritus being common, although manageable with topical treatments. Gastrointestinal problems such as colitis and diarrhea may arise, requiring immediate medical attention to prevent severe dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Monitoring liver function is essential due to the potential risk of pembrolizumab-induced hepatitis, which can lead to severe liver injury if not addressed promptly. Endocrinopathies, including thyroid dysfunction and adrenal insufficiency, may necessitate hormone replacement therapy for management. Additionally, while rare, pneumonitis poses a serious concern, requiring prompt treatment to avoid significant morbidity. This extensive body of evidence underscores the transformative potential of pembrolizumab in GC treatment and the importance of tailored strategies to optimize patient outcomes in this challenging clinical setting. The efficacy of pembrolizumab in GC with liver metastases is a subject of ongoing research. While the response rates in clinical trials are modest, they represent a significant improvement over historical outcomes with chemotherapy alone. The potential for pembrolizumab to provide durable responses in a subset of patients is particularly encouraging[16].

CONCLUSION

The combination of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with pembrolizumab has carved out a niche in the treatment landscape of GC with liver metastases. However, the safety and management of its associated complications are paramount. Its ability to improve survival outcomes and the quality of life for patients is a testament to the progress being made in the field of oncology. As research continues, there is hope that pembrolizumab will become an integral part of the treatment regimen for these patients, offering them a chance at a longer and better life. The response to immunotherapy in GC patients with liver metastasis was lower than in those without liver metastases[2]. This editorial provides a snapshot of the current understanding of pembrolizumab’s safety and complications in the context of GC with liver metastasis. It synthesizes information from clinical trials and real-world studies to provide an overview of pembrolizumab’s efficacy in GC with liver metastases. Clinicians must weigh the benefits of pembrolizumab against its potential risks and tailor their approach to each patient’s unique clinical scenario. For a more comprehensive analysis, further reading and consultation of clinical trial publications are recommended.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Greece

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Zhang XQ S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: Webster JR P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Yang WJ, Zhao HP, Yu Y, Wang JH, Guo L, Liu JY, Pu J, Lv J. Updates on global epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29:2452-2468.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 72]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 73.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (7)]
2.  Liu K, Wu CX, Liang H, Wang T, Zhang JY, Wang XT. Analysis of the impact of immunotherapy efficacy and safety in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastasis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16:700-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Xiao Y, Zhang B, Wu Y. Prognostic analysis and liver metastases relevant factors after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with metachronous liver metastases: a population-based study. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188:415-424.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Conde Monroy D, Ibañez-Pinilla M, Sabogal JC, Rey Chaves C, Isaza-Restrepo A, Girón F, Vanegas M, Ibañez-Villalba R, Mirow L, Siepmann T. Survival Outcomes of Hepatectomy in Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53372]  [Article Influence: 8895.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (123)]
6.  Motoo I, Ando T, Hamashima T, Kajiura S, Sakumura M, Ueda Y, Murayama A, Ogawa K, Tsukada K, Ueda A, Suzuki N, Nakada N, Nakashima K, Hosokawa A, Yasuda I. Liver metastasis affects progression pattern during immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1193533.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Shiravand Y, Khodadadi F, Kashani SMA, Hosseini-Fard SR, Hosseini S, Sadeghirad H, Ladwa R, O'Byrne K, Kulasinghe A. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy. Curr Oncol. 2022;29:3044-3060.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 390]  [Article Influence: 195.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Kelly RJ, Bever K, Chao J, Ciombor KK, Eng C, Fakih M, Goyal L, Hubbard J, Iyer R, Kemberling HT, Krishnamurthi S, Ku G, Mordecai MM, Morris VK 2nd, Paulson AS, Peterson V, Shah MA, Le DT. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Akkanapally V, Bai XF, Basu S. Therapeutic Immunomodulation in Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Tian BW, Han CL, Wang HC, Yan LJ, Ding ZN, Liu H, Mao XC, Tian JC, Xue JS, Yang LS, Tan SY, Dong ZR, Yan YC, Wang DX, Li T. Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023;40:255-287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Liang H, Li Z, Huang Z, Wu C, Qiu Y, Liang Y, Chen X, Li F, Xu Z, Li G, Liu H, Zhao L. Prognostic characteristics and clinical response to immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 for patients with advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1015549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Fuchs C, Wyrwicz L, Lee KW, Kudaba I, Garrido M, Chung HC, Lee J, Castro HR, Mansoor W, Braghiroli MI, Karaseva N, Caglevic C, Villanueva L, Goekkurt E, Satake H, Enzinger P, Alsina M, Benson A, Chao J, Ko AH, Wainberg ZA, Kher U, Shah S, Kang SP, Tabernero J. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With First-line, Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KEYNOTE-062 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1571-1580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 583]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 727]  [Article Influence: 181.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Rha SY, Oh DY, Yañez P, Bai Y, Ryu MH, Lee J, Rivera F, Alves GV, Garrido M, Shiu KK, Fernández MG, Li J, Lowery MA, Çil T, Cruz FM, Qin S, Luo S, Pan H, Wainberg ZA, Yin L, Bordia S, Bhagia P, Wyrwicz LS; KEYNOTE-859 investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-859): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:1181-1195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 77.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Tabernero J, Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Fuchs CS, Janjigian YY, Bhagia P, Li K, Adelberg D, Qin SK. KEYNOTE-859: a Phase III study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol. 2021;17:2847-2855.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Hou W, Zhao Y, Zhu H. Predictive Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Current Status and Emerging Prospects. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, Andrews S, Armand P, Bhatia S, Budde LE, Costa L, Davies M, Dunnington D, Ernstoff MS, Frigault M, Kaffenberger BH, Lunning M, McGettigan S, McPherson J, Mohindra NA, Naidoo J, Olszanski AJ, Oluwole O, Patel SP, Pennell N, Reddy S, Ryder M, Santomasso B, Shofer S, Sosman JA, Wang Y, Weight RM, Johnson-Chilla A, Zuccarino-Catania G, Engh A. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:230-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 140]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 275]  [Article Influence: 91.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]