BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 10
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
ISSN
1948-9366
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 121942
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121942
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1  Flowchart of literature selection.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment of the included studies. A: Risk of bias in the included studies; B: Summary of risk of bias.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Forest plots of electroacupuncture plus standard care vs standard care or sham electroacupuncture plus standard care on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery outcomes. A: Time to first flatus; B: Time to first defecation; C: Bowel sound recovery time; D: Time to tolerability of liquid, semiliquid, and solid food; E: Length of postoperative hospital stay. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.