BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 112416
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.112416
Figure 1
Figure 1 Imaging examinations. A: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography suggested thickening of the cystic duct walls, common hepatic duct, and proximal common bile duct; B: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography suggested partial dilatation of intrahepatic bile duct as well as stenosis of common hepatic duct and common bile duct; C: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography suggested nodular-like foci of metabolic increased in the area of biliary tracts of the hepatic hilar region. Orange arrow: The stenosis of common bile duct.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with choledochoscopy. Orange arrow: A stenosis with reddened and slightly rough mucosa at the upper section of the common bile duct.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Placement of a plastic biliary stent across the stenosis. A: The anterior end of the stent (8.5 Fr diameter, 15 cm length) was positioned within the left hepatic duct; B: The terminal end of the stent terminates was positioned within the duodenum. Orange box: A stent in the left hepatic duct.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Pathological examination of the stenosis locating at the upper section of the common bile duct. A: Hematoxylin and eosin showed clusters of heterogeneous cells beneath the mucosal layer, suggesting poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; B: Immunohistochemical staining showed cytokeratin (+). Yellow circle: Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma cells.