Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 105925
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105925
Figure 1
Figure 1 Acute appendicitis located in retrocecal position. This figure is generated based on a case performed at Konyang University Hospital.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Flow charts of patient selection process. SPLA: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy; MPLA: Multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Postoperative surgical wound site after single-port laparoscopic appendectomy. This figure is generated based on a case performed at Konyang University Hospital.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Histogram for comparing operation time and estimated blood loss between the single-port laparoscopic appendectomy group and multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy group. A: Histogram of operation time for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA); B: Histogram of operation time for multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MPLA); C: Histogram of estimated blood loss (EBL) for SPLA; D: Histogram of EBL for MPLA. SPLA: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy; MPLA: Multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy; EBL: Estimated blood loss.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Non-inferiority test. A: Continuous variables; B: Categorical variables. SPLA: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy; MPLA: Multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy; EBL: Estimated blood loss; OR: Odds ratio.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Post-hoc power analysis for postoperative outcomes. EBL: Estimated blood loss.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Forest plot for multivariable logistic regression comparing the single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy groups.