Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 100790
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100790
Figure 1
Figure 1 Comparison of alpha diversity between cefuroxime-sensitive group and cefuroxime-resistant group based on different methods. A: Observed species; B: Chao1; C: ACE: Abundance-based coverage estimator; D: Shannon; E: Simpson; F: Inverse Simpson. Cefur-S: Cefuroxime-sensitive; Cefur-NS: Cefuroxime-resistant.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparison of beta diversity between cefuroxime-sensitive group and cefuroxime-resistant group based on different methods. A: Bray-Crutis; B: Jaccard; C: Unweighted unifrac; D: Weighted unifrac. Cefur-S: Cefuroxime-sensitive; Cefur-NS: Cefuroxime-resistant.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis between cefuroxime-resistant and cefuroxime-sensitive. A: The cladogram of the linear discriminant analysis effect size result; B: The barplot of linear discriminant analysis score in cefuroxime-sensitive group. Cefur-S: Cefuroxime-sensitive; LDA: Linear discriminant analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Correlation analysis of the bacterial community. A: Heatmap depicting correlations at the genus level; B: Heatmap depicting correlations at the phylum level.