Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Diabetes. Sep 15, 2016; 7(17): 396-405
Published online Sep 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.396
Published online Sep 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.396
WHO 1965 | WHO 1980 | WHO 1985 | ADA1997WHO 1999 | ADA 2003 | IEC 2009ADA 2010WHO 2011 | |
IFG | Not defined | Not defined | Not defined | Fasting ≥ 6.11 to < 7 mmol/L and post glucose (if measured) < 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 5.5 to < 7 mmol/L and post glucose (if measured) < 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 5.5 to < 7 mmol/L and post glucose (if measured) < 11.1 mmol/L or HbA1c (5.7%-6.4%) |
IGT | Post glucose 6.11-7.1 mmol/L | Fasting < 8 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 8 to < 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting < 7.8 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 7.8 to < 11.1 mol/L | Fasting (if measured) < 7 mmol/L and post glucose ≥ 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting (if measured) < 7 mmol/L and post glucose 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting (if measured) < 7 mmol/L and post glucose 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L or HbA1c (5.7%-6.4%) |
DM | Post glucose ≥ 7.22 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 8 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 7.8 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 7 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 7 mmol/L and/or post glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L | Fasting ≥ 7 mmol/L or Post glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% |
Ref. | Study population characteristics | Assessment of retinopathy | Method of determining cutoff | Cut off |
Tsugawa et al[48] | 3 yr follow-up; number = 19987 Japanese subjects; age ≥ 21 yr; diabetes not excluded | Nonmydriatic 45° retinal photograph | Test for nonlinearity in multivariate logistic regression models with restricted cubicspline Multivariate logistic regression with categories of HbA1c as independent variable | Possible threshold at HbA1c levels between 6% and 7% 6.5%-6.9% |
van Leiden et al[49] Hoorn study | 7.9-11.0 yr follow-up; number = 233; age 50-74 yr; analyses in total study group and in subjects without diabetes | Ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography | Logistic model with categories of HbA1c (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, glucose metabolism category) | No threshold found |
- Citation: Kumar R, Nandhini LP, Kamalanathan S, Sahoo J, Vivekanadan M. Evidence for current diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2016; 7(17): 396-405
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v7/i17/396.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.396