Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Diabetes. Dec 10, 2015; 6(17): 1337-1344
Published online Dec 10, 2015. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i17.1337
Published online Dec 10, 2015. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i17.1337
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population according to gender
Variables | Total (n = 772) | Men (n = 228) | Women (n = 544) |
1Age, yr | 58.34 (12.07) | 58.63 (12.67) | 58.22 (11.82) |
1BMI, kg/m2 | 27.36 (4.56) | 27.08 (4.56) | 27.47 (4.56) |
1Waist circumference, cm | 91.91 (10.47) | 97.05 (10.88) | 89.78 (9.52)2 |
1Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL | 94.41 (12.60) | 96.17 (13.94) | 93.68 (11.94)2 |
1,4Oral glucose tolerance test, mg/dL | 107.89 (32.82) | 111.11 (36.55) | 106.23 (30.75) |
1,4HbA1c, % | 6.49 (1.27) | 6.39 (1.24) | 6.56 (1.31) |
Undiagnosed DM2, n(%) | 20 (2.59) | 6 (2.63) | 14 (2.57) |
Prediabetes, n(%) | 186 (24.09) | 61 (26.75) | 125 (22.98) |
FINDRISC score | 11.84 (4.80) | 11.00 (4.71) | 12.18 (4.80)3 |
Table 2 Prevalence of components of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score according to gender n (%)
Variables | Total (n = 772) | Men (n = 228) | Women (n = 544) |
Age (yr) | |||
< 45 | 106 (13.73) | 35 (15.35) | 71 (13.05) |
45-54 | 207 (26.81) | 59 (25.88) | 148 (27.21) |
55-64 | 203 (26.30) | 51 (22.37) | 152 (27.94) |
> 64 | 256 (33.16) | 83 (36.40) | 173 (31.80) |
BMI (kg/m2) | |||
< 25 | 250 (32.38) | 75 (32.89) | 175 (32.17) |
25-30 | 331 (42.88) | 105 (46.05) | 226 (41.54) |
> 30 | 191 (24.74) | 48 (21.05) | 143 (26.29) |
WC (cm) | |||
M: < 90; W: < 80 | 121 (15.67) | 50 (21.93) | 71 (13.05)2 |
M: 90-98; W: 80-88 | 272 (35.23) | 84 (36.84) | 188 (34.56) |
M: > 98; W: > 88 | 379 (49.09) | 94 (41.23) | 285 (52.39) |
PA (30 min/d) | |||
Yes | 362 (46.95) | 112 (49.12) | 250 (46.04) |
No | 409 (53.05) | 116 (50.88) | 293 (53.96) |
Vegetables - fruits | |||
Daily | 433 (56.09) | 112 (49.12) | 321 (59.01)1 |
No daily | 339 (43.91) | 116 (50.88) | 223 (40.99) |
Hypertension | |||
Without medication | 442 (57.25) | 136 (59.65) | 306 (56.25) |
With medication | 330 (42.75) | 92 (40.35) | 238 (43.75) |
Hyperglycemia antecedent | |||
No | 634 (82.12) | 199 (87.28) | 435 (79.96)1 |
Yes | 138 (17.88) | 29 (12.72) | 109 (20.04) |
Familiar antecedents DM2 | |||
No | 473 (61.27) | 147 (64.47) | 326 (59.93) |
Grandparents | 72 (9.33) | 26 (11.40) | 46 (8.46) |
Parents | 227 (29.40) | 55 (24.12) | 172 (31.62) |
Table 3 Odds ratios of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus according to Finnish Diabetes Risk Score tertiles at baseline
Undiagnosed DM2 (FPG≥126 mg/dL and/or OGTT≥200 mg/dL and/or HbA1c≥6.5%) | |||||||||
1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile | |||||||
OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | |
Unadjusted | 1.0 | - | - | 2.45 | 0.60-9.92 | 0.207 | 5.69 | 1.56-20.67 | 0.008 |
Gender-adjusted | 1.0 | - | - | 2.49 | 0.61-10.10 | 0.199 | 5.88 | 1.60-21.54 | 0.007 |
Age- and gender-adjusted | 1.0 | - | - | 2.28 | 0.55-9.35 | 0.252 | 4.93 | 1.28-18.92 | 0.020 |
Table 4 Hazard ratios of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus according to Finnish Diabetes Risk Score tertiles at baseline, during follow-up and among the subsample of prediabetic patients
Incident DM2 (FPG≥126 mg/dL and/or OGTT≥200 mg/dL and/or HbA1c≥6.5%) | |||||||||
1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile | |||||||
HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
Unadjusted | 1.00 | - | - | 3.67 | 0.77-17.36 | 0.101 | 5.31 | 1.15-24.43 | 0.032 |
Gender-adjusted | 1.00 | - | - | 3.93 | 0.81-18.89 | 0.087 | 5.75 | 1.22-27.03 | 0.027 |
Age- and gender-adjusted | 1.00 | - | - | 3.52 | 0.70-17.53 | 0.124 | 4.81 | 0.93-24.85 | 0.061 |
Table 5 Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to identify undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus by gender
FINDRISC score | Undiagnosed DM2 (FPG≥126 mg/dL and/or OGTT≥200 mg/dL and/or HbA1c≥6.5%) | ||||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Youden's index | |
Cutoff value ≥ 11 | |||||
Men | 83.3 | 49.1 | 4.2 | 99.1 | 0.324 |
Women | 85.7 | 37.2 | 3.5 | 99.0 | 0.228 |
Cutoff value ≥ 12 | |||||
Men | 66.7 | 56.8 | 4.0 | 98.4 | 0.234 |
Women | 85.7 | 44.9 | 3.9 | 99.2 | 0.306 |
Cutoff value ≥ 13 | |||||
Men | 66.7 | 66.2 | 5.1 | 98.7 | 0.328 |
Women | 78.6 | 54.3 | 4.4 | 99.0 | 0.329 |
Cutoff value ≥ 14 | |||||
Men | 66.7 | 75.2 | 6.8 | 98.8 | 0.419 |
Women | 71.4 | 62.6 | 4.8 | 98.8 | 0.340 |
Cutoff value ≥ 15 | |||||
Men | 50.0 | 81.1 | 6.7 | 98.4 | 0.310 |
Women | 57.1 | 70.7 | 4.9 | 98.4 | 0.278 |
Cutoff value ≥ 16 | |||||
Men | 33.3 | 86.0 | 6.1 | 98.0 | 0.193 |
Women | 50.0 | 76.2 | 5.3 | 98.3 | 0.262 |
Cutoff value ≥ 17 | |||||
Men | 33.3 | 88.3 | 7.1 | 98.0 | 0.216 |
Women | 50.0 | 81.9 | 6.8 | 98.4 | 0.318 |
Table 6 Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus by gender, during follow-up and among the subsample of prediabetic patients
FINDRISC score | Incident DM2 (FPG≥126 mg/dL and/or OGTT≥200 mg/dL and/or HbA1c≥6.5%) | ||||
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Youden's index | |
Cutoff value ≥ 12 | |||||
Men | 85.7 | 44.7 | 22.2 | 94.4 | 0.304 |
Women | 92.3 | 28.0 | 15.2 | 96.3 | 0.202 |
Cutoff value ≥ 13 | |||||
Men | 85.7 | 52.6 | 25.0 | 95.2 | 0.383 |
Women | 92.3 | 34.4 | 16.4 | 97.0 | 0.267 |
Cutoff value ≥ 14 | |||||
Men | 71.4 | 60.5 | 25.0 | 92.0 | 0.319 |
Women | 84.6 | 39.8 | 16.4 | 94.9 | 0.244 |
Cutoff value ≥ 15 | |||||
Men | 57.1 | 65.8 | 23.5 | 89.3 | 0.229 |
Women | 76.9 | 49.5 | 17.5 | 93.9 | 0.263 |
Cutoff value ≥ 16 | |||||
Men | 42.9 | 68.4 | 20.0 | 86.7 | 0.112 |
Women | 69.2 | 61.3 | 20.0 | 93.4 | 0.305 |
Cutoff value ≥ 17 | |||||
Men | 42.9 | 73.7 | 23.0 | 87.5 | 0.165 |
Women | 53.9 | 66.7 | 18.4 | 91.2 | 0.205 |
Cutoff value ≥ 18 | |||||
Men | 42.9 | 79.0 | 27.3 | 88.2 | 0.218 |
Women | 46.2 | 76.3 | 21.4 | 91.0 | 0.224 |
- Citation: Gomez-Arbelaez D, Alvarado-Jurado L, Ayala-Castillo M, Forero-Naranjo L, Camacho PA, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Colombian population: A longitudinal observational study. World J Diabetes 2015; 6(17): 1337-1344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v6/i17/1337.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i17.1337